Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Braswell Motor Freight Lines, Inc.

386 F.2d 190 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 24, 1967

This case is before us upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order issued against the respondent. The Board’s decision and order are reported at 156 N.L.R.B. No. 66. … We find upon consideration of the entire record that the Board’s order is supported by substantial evidence. The order of the Board will be enforced.

Romanski v. Detroit Entertainment

428 F.3d 629 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 28, 2005

At 3 p.m., Romanski exited the valet area to board what she thought was her bus; it turned out not to be but instead of returning to the valet area she ran into her friends and stayed outside. … See Lee v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Okun Brothers Shoe Store, Inc.

825 F.2d 102 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 29, 1987

However, where the testimony is uncontradicted and properly found to be credible, that testimony may be substantial evidence to support the Board’s determination. Union Carbide Corp. v. … Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corp. v. NLRB, 732 F.2d 1288 (6th Cir.1984); NLRB v. Johnson and Hardin Co., 554 F.2d 275 (6th Cir.1977); NLRB v. Savair Mfg.

National Cash Register Company v. National Labor Relations Board

405 F.2d 497 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 8, 1969

The decision and order of the Board are reported at 167 N.L.R.B. No. 158. … Upon consideration, the Court finds that the decision and order of the Board are not supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R.

Ohio Public Service Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

144 F.2d 252 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 17, 1944

This cause came on to be heard on petition of the Ohio Public Service Company to review the order of the National Labor Relations Board of Septemebr 18, 1943, and upon the answer of the National Labor Relations Board praying … enforcement of its said order, and has been considered upon the full record, briefs and oral argument;, and it appearing that there is substantial evidence to support the findings of fact of the National Labor Relations Board

Adair Standish Corporation, and v. National Labor Relations Board, And

912 F.2d 854 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 24, 1990

NLRB v. … NLRB v.

Danny Brown v. United States

545 F. App'x 435 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 4, 2013

-4- No. 12-4497 Brown v. … -5- No. 12-4497 Brown v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Publishers Printing Company, Inc.

650 F.2d 859 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 11, 1981

There is evidence to support the contrary finding of the Board. … The order of the Board is enforced.

Deborah A. Northcross v. Board of Education of the Memphis City Schools, Deborah A. Northcross, Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants v. Board of Education of the Memphis City Schools, Defendants-Cross-Appellees

466 F.2d 890 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 29, 1972

The initial chapter of this story was written in 1960 when Plaintiffs first sought to apply the principles of Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954) [Brown I] and 349 U. … No costs allowed. 1 See Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, 396 U.S. 19 , 90 S.Ct. 29 , 24 L.Ed.2d 19 (1969); Carter v.

Beverly California Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, Cross-Applicant

970 F.2d 1548 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 29, 1992

NLRB, 716 F.2d 351 , 357 n. 12 (6th Cir.1983), we reminded the Board that it is the courts, not the Board, that “bear the final responsibility for interpreting the labor laws.” Beverly Enterprises v. … Erroneously grouping Beverly with cases "upholding the Board's certification of a nurses’ collective bargaining unit,” the Seventh Circuit has read Beverly as a case "where the Board's order was enforced.” NLRB v.

Meijer, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board

130 F.3d 1209 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 4, 1998

Standard of Review 7 We accept the Board's factual findings if they are supported by "substantial evidence on the record" as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. … NLRB v.

Brown v. District Attorney General's Office, 19th Judicial Dist.

56 F.3d 64 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 24, 1995

BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, 19th Judicial District; Patrick McCutchin, District Attorney; Bill Cloud, Assistant District Attorney, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-6614. … Mars v. Hanberry, 752 F.2d 254, 256 (6th Cir. 1985); Childs v. Duckworth, 705 F.2d 915, 922 (7th Cir. 1983).

Stone v. Board of Directors of Tennessee Valley Authority

35 F. App'x 193 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 15, 2002

Stone, appeals from the summary judgment granted to defendant, Board of Directors of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), on her Title VII sex discrimination and retaliation claims. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e. … Bowman v. Shawnee State Univ., 220 F.3d 456, 462 (6th Cir.2000). Clearly a positive review, with or without supporting comments, is not an adverse employment action. See Primes v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Akron Paint & Varnish Company

985 F.2d 852 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 28, 1992

Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (8th Cir.1963)). … NLRB v. Reynolds, 399 F.2d 668, 669 (6th Cir.1968). As Akron did not raise this issue before the Board, it is waived. See Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v.

Cissell Manufacturing Company v. United States Department of Labor

101 F.3d 1132 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 7, 1997

Lemar, 904 F.2d 1042, 1046 (6th Cir.1990) (“If the ALJ or the Board has erred by ... reviewing evidence under an incorrect legal standard, then we must remand the case for additional proceedings.”); Faries v. … Cissell nominally reinstated Brown as an employee when the Worker’s Compensation Board awarded Brown a ten percent disability payment in December 1985. . Brown initiated two separate actions against .

National Labor Relations Board v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

444 F.2d 502 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 30, 1971

We hold that the Board’s determination of the period for which back pay is owed is not inconsistent with governing principles of law, see, e. g., N. L. R. B. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Mfg. … Compare Madden v. Grain Elevator, Flour and Feed Mill Workers, ILA Local 418, 334 F.2d 1014, 1022 (7th Cir. 1964). The order of the Board is enforced.

National Labor Relations Board v. Ohio Car & Truck Leasing, Inc.

415 F.2d 1375 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 10, 1969

This case is before the Court on the application of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order reported at 167 N.L.R.B. No. 37. … Upon consideration of briefs and oral arguments, it is ordered that the order of the Board be and hereby is enforced except as hereinafter provided.

National Labor Relations Board v. Topinka's Country House, Inc.

624 F.2d 770 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 1, 1980

ORDER The National Labor Relations Board has applied to this court for enforcement of its order issued on March 13, 1978, against respondent Topinka’s Country House, Inc., (reported at 235 NLRB No. 18 ). … Upon due consideration, we conclude that *771 the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Board’s application for enforcement of its order be and it is hereby granted.

Time Auto Transportation, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

377 F.3d 496 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 23, 2004

II 9 We sustain the findings and conclusions of the Board if they are "supported by substantial evidence on the record viewed as a whole." Universal Camera Corp. v. … We also review the "Board's application of the law to particular facts under the substantial evidence standard." Turnbull Cone Baking Co. v.

United States v. John Ennix Anderson, Charles Brown, and John Russell Hill

352 F.2d 500 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 9, 1965

Wood v. United States, 283 F.2d 4 (C.A.5, 1960). … American Tobacco Co. v. United States, 147 F.2d 93, 107 (C.A.6, 1944), aff’d, 328 U.S. 781 , 66 S.Ct. 1125 , 90 L.Ed. 1575 (1946); Blumenthal v.