Case law

United States v. Ronald Jackson Crane

499 F.2d 1385 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 11, 1974

Brown, whose case was tried first, was found not guilty. Consequently we do not believe that the jury drew an adverse inference from Brown’s association with defendant as developed at trial. … Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 763 , 89 S.Ct. 2034 , 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969); United States v. Kaye, 492 F.2d 744 (6th Cir. 1974); cf. United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 , 94 S.Ct. 467 , 38 L.Ed.2d 427 (1973).

Gamble Enterprises, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

203 F.2d 565 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 10, 1953

345 U.S. 117 , 73 S.Ct. 560 , reversing our judgment of May 9, 1952, 196 F.2d 61 , It is now ordered that our judgment and order are set aside and held for naught and the cause is remanded to the National Labor Relations Board … Our order of April 10, 1953 remanding the cause to the National Labor Relations Board for further proceedings, 202 F,2d 954, is set aside and the following order is to be entered.

Albertson's Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

301 F.3d 441 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 20, 2002

The Board explained that its position was consistent with the Supreme Court's decision in NLRB v. … Dupont Dow Elastomers, L.L.C. v. NLRB, 296 F.3d 495 , 500 (6th Cir.2002). 29 However, this Court gives no deference to the Board where the Board's decision "rest[s] on erroneous legal foundations." Lechmere, Inc. v.

Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.

15 F.2d 509 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 6, 1926

McConnell v. Pedigo, 92 Ky. 465 , 18 S. W. 15 ; Palmer Transfer Co. v. Anderson, 131 Ky. 217 , 115 S. W. 182 , 19 L. R. A. (N. S.) 756, 133 Am. St. Rep. 237 ; Commonwealth v. … Browning v. L. & N. Ry. Co., 281 S. W. 490 . We think that under the rule of “noscitur a soeiis” the section would naturally be construed as so limited. In McConnell v.

The Timken Roller Bearing Company v. National Labor Relations Board

325 F.2d 746 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 21, 1963

B. v. Jacobs Mfg. Co., 196 F.2d 680 , C.A.2nd; N. L. R. B. v. … B. v. J. H.

Josephine Goss v. Board of Education, City of Knoxville, Tennessee

406 F.2d 1183 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 10, 1969

Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, Va., 345 F.2d 310 (C.A.4); Wheeler v. Durham City Board of Education, 346 F.2d 768 (C.A.4); Goss v. … Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, Va., 345 F.2d 310 (C.A.4) Wheeler v. Durham City Board of Education, 346 F.2d 768 (C.A.4); Goss v.

Kendall v. Board Of Education Of The Memphis City Schools

627 F.2d 1 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 14, 1980

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Brown v. … Finally, because the Board did not afford Kendall a hearing to establish the truth of its accusations, all references to the charges must be expunged from Kendall's personnel file. Brown v.

Tns, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

296 F.3d 384 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 10, 2002

Co. v. … Co. v. NRDC, 462 U.S. 87, 103 , 103 S.Ct. 2246 , 76 L.Ed.2d 437 (1983); Fed. Power Comm'n v. Florida Power & Light Co., 404 U.S. 453, 463 , 92 S.Ct. 637 , 30 L.Ed.2d 600 (1972); Browning-Ferris Indus. v.

Northcross v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools

489 F.2d 18 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 4, 1973

The action herein considered is that of the City in failing to make an application of gasoline to the School Board required for the increased school bus operation under certain desegregation plans, and the District Judge

National Labor Relations Board v. Elias Brothers Big Boy, Inc.

327 F.2d 421 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 12, 1964

B. v. … B. v. Oertel Brewing Co., 197 F.2d 59, 61-62 (C.A.6) :• “the credibility of the witnesses and the weight of the evidence was for the Board.

United Fireworks Mfg. Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

252 F.2d 428 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 5, 1958

It is settled law that the credibility of the witnesses and the reasonable inferences to be drawn from the evidence are matters for determination by the board. N. L. R. B. v. … The Board approved this finding.

National Labor Relations Board v. Power Equipment Company

319 F.2d 861 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 26, 1963

The Court remanded the case to the Board with instructions to fashion an order in accordance with the modification. … On April 30, 1963, the Board filed its Motion for Entry of Decree with a proposed Decree modifying the Board’s order.

American Bread Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

411 F.2d 147 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 14, 1969

American Bread places great reliance on the rules and regulations which the Board has promulgated under its discretionary authority. National Labor Relations Board v. A. J. … See Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. Board, 313 U.S. 146 , 61 S.Ct. 908 , 85 L.Ed. 1251 (1941), N. L. R. B. v. Lawrence Typographical Union No. 570, 376 F.2d 643 (10th Cir. 1967).

Columbia Portland Cement Company v. National Labor Relations Board

915 F.2d 253 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 2, 1990

.’ ” Star Meat Co. v. … See Methodist Hospital of Ky., Inc. v.

Gartha Conley v. National Mines Corporation

595 F.3d 297 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 12, 2010

Further, a failure by the ALJ to apply the correct legal standard presents a legal question over which the Review Board and this Court have plenary review. Arch of Ky., Inc. v. … This Court therefore affirms the decision of the Benefits Review Board. 7 The Court notes that the case upon which the Petitioner relies, Brown v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Cincinnati Chemical Works, Inc.

144 F.2d 597 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 17, 1944

So, in duty bound, we reluctantly decree enforcement of the cease and desist order entered by the Labor Board. But enforcement of the Board’s order for reinstatement of Julius Price with back pay is a different matter. … When the passage of the Wagner Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., was debated, its proponents placed much stress upon the check upon the power *599 of the Labor Board assured by court review.

National Labor Relations Board v. Ryder System, Inc.

983 F.2d 705 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 8, 1993

Corp., USA v. NLRB, 850 F.2d 524 , 538 (9th Cir.1988). In addition, the Board possesses substantial discretion in the reinstatement of employees. David R. Webb Co. v. … The AU’s finding, adopted by the Board, was that Ryder failed to make the necessary showing. We conclude that the Board acted within its discretion in adopting this finding. 6 V.

National Labor Relations Board v. Bailey Co. (East Side Branch)

180 F.2d 278 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 13, 1950

Woolworth Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 121 F.2d 658 ; M. H. Ritzwoller Co. ,v. National Labor Relations Board, 7 Cir., 114 F.2d 432, 435 . … In National Labor Relations Board v.

Contech Division, Spx Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

164 F.3d 297 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 30, 1998

by a union," NLRB v. … closure" (citing NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Grieder Machine Tool & Die Co.

142 F.2d 163 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 13, 1944

The Board might have drawn either of two inconsistent inferences from the record. See N. L. R. B. v. Nevada Cons. Copper Corp., 316 U.S. 105 , 62 S.Ct. 960 , 86 L.Ed. 1305 . … As to the question of variance, if any really existed, which we need not determine, we think respondent is foreclosed by National Labor Relations Board v.