Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.39s
Zantop International Airlines, Inc. v. National Mediation Board
732 F.2d 517 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 19, 1984
The district court concluded that the Board’s action was not subject to judicial review because there was no showing that the Board acted in excess of its statutory authority. Zantop International Airlines, Inc. v. … International In-Flight Catering Co., Ltd. v. National Mediation Board, 555 F.2d 712, 719 (1977). The Second Circuit agreed in British Airways Board v. National Mediation Board, 685 F.2d 52, 55 (1982).
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Lane Aviation Corporation
615 F.2d 399 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 18, 1980
or reopening of the record after the Board decision or order. … The Board contravened its own regulation by granting intervenors’ motion to reconsider. It had no power to act as it did, since an administrative agency must abide by its own rules. Pacific Molasses Company v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Federal Engineering Co.
155 F.2d 17 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 17, 1946
We have considered the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for a rehearing in the light of the opinion of the Supreme Court in National Labor Relations Board v. … Neither on the record in this cause, nor on that in National Labor Rela *18 tions Board, v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMcswain v. County Board Of Education Of Anderson County, Tennessee
214 F.2d 131 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 3, 1954
V. McSwain; Clifford Dickie; Mrs. Mary Dickie; O. W. Willis, Appellants, v. COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ANDERSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, consisting of J. M. Burkhart, C. L. Brown, Dr. J. M. Cox, Jack Duncan, O. C. … et al. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedEastern Gas & Fuel Associates v. National Labor Relations Board
162 F.2d 864 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 7, 1947
Packard Motor Co. v. NLRB, 330 U.S. 485 , 67 S.Ct. 789 ; NLRB v. Atkins Co., decided May 19, 1947, 67 S.Ct. 1265 ; NLRB v. … Jones and Laughlin Steel Corp., decided May 19, 1947, 67 S.Ct. 1274 ; see also Jones and Laughlin Steel Corp. v. United Mine Workers of America, App.D.C., 159 F.2d 18 , cert. denied May 19, 1947, 67 S.Ct. 1350 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedScott Williams v. Addison Cmty. Schs.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 2, 2026
In January 2022, the Board unanimously chose Williams to serve as Board president for a one-year term. The Board is governed by bylaws. … Id. at 549 (citing Brown v. Cassens Transp. Co., 546 F.3d 347, 363 (6th Cir. 2008)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJoseph Padgett v. Louisville and Jefferson County Air Board
492 F.2d 1258 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 15, 1974
Joseph Padgett v. Louisville and Jefferson County Air Board, No. 72-2221 (6th Cir. May 7, 1973) (order). … In recent years courts have given considerable attention to Parker v. Brown and have generally rejected “ . the facile conclusion that action by any public official automatically confers exemption.” George R.
Cited 12 timesPublished647 F.2d 634 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 29, 1980
National Labor Relations Board v. … Determining the object of labor union picketing is a recurring and necessary function of the Board, and the Board’s determination is thus entitled to deference by the courts. N. L. R. B. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedFair Elections Ohio v. Jon Husted
770 F.3d 456 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 24, 2014
In Crawford v. Marion County *461 Election Board, the Seventh Circuit concluded that the Democratic Party had standing to challenge an Indiana voter ID law. 472 F.3d 949 (7th Cir.2007). … In Florida State Conference of the NAACP v.
Cited 52 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
677 F.2d 421 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 10, 1982
*422 ORDER This matter is before the court upon cross-petitions for enforcement and review, respectively, of an order issued September 30, 1980, by the National Labor Relations Board against United Parcel Service, Inc., and … Accordingly, The order of the Board is enforced.
Cited 4 timesPublishedGamble Enterprises, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
203 F.2d 565 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 10, 1953
345 U.S. 117 , 73 S.Ct. 560 , reversing our judgment of May 9, 1952, 196 F.2d 61 , It is now ordered that our judgment and order are set aside and held for naught and the cause is remanded to the National Labor Relations Board … Our order of April 10, 1953 remanding the cause to the National Labor Relations Board for further proceedings, 202 F,2d 954, is set aside and the following order is to be entered.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJames Loudermill v. Cleveland Board of Education, Richard Donnelly v. Parma Board of Education
763 F.2d 202 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 30, 1985
Law Rep. 158 James LOUDERMILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLEVELAND BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Richard DONNELLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PARMA BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorthcross v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools
489 F.2d 18 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 4, 1973
The action herein considered is that of the City in failing to make an application of gasoline to the School Board required for the increased school bus operation under certain desegregation plans, and the District Judge
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Elias Brothers Big Boy, Inc.
327 F.2d 421 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 12, 1964
B. v. … B. v. Oertel Brewing Co., 197 F.2d 59, 61-62 (C.A.6) :• “the credibility of the witnesses and the weight of the evidence was for the Board.
Overruled on other grounds by National Labor Relations Board v. Town & Country Electric, Inc., 516 U.S. 85 (1995)Cited 46 timesPublishedColquest Energy, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
965 F.2d 116 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 2, 1992
[Colquest] to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board [NLRB or Board] issued May 15, 1991. The NLRB has cross-petitioned for enforcement of the same order. … NLRB v. Basic Wire Products, Inc., 516 F.2d 261, 263 (6th Cir.1975). The function of this Court sitting in review of an NLRB decision is to ascertain whether the Board abused its discretion in resolving the dispute.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMurray Iii v. Board Of Trustees, University Of Louisville
659 F.2d 77 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 9, 1981
659 F.2d 77 Thomas McElvain MURRAY III, Donald Eugene Floyd, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE; James G. … Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232 , 94 S.Ct. 1683 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974), and Wood v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Piqua Munising Wood Products Co.
109 F.2d 552 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 16, 1940
National Labor Relations Board v. Lund, 8 Cir., 103 F.2d 815 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Colton, 6 Cir., 105 F.2d 179 . … Jeffrey-De Witt Insulator Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 91 F.2d 134 , 112 A.L.R. 948 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Carlisle Lumber Co., 9 Cir., 94 F.2d 138 ; Black Diamond S. S. Corporation v.
Cited 31 timesPublished551 F. App'x 804 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 3, 2014
While the No. 13-1476 Welch, et al. v. Brown, et al. … - 11 - No. 13-1476 Welch, et al. v. Brown, et al.
Cited 13 timesUnpublishedElectric Power Board of Chattanooga v. Monsanto Co.
879 F.2d 1368 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 14, 1989
This is an appeal by the Electric Power Board of Chattanooga (EPBC) and Huntsville Electric Utilities Board (HEUB) from dismissal of their claims against defendants, Monsanto Co. … In Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States v. Ronald Jackson Crane
499 F.2d 1385 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 11, 1974
Brown, whose case was tried first, was found not guilty. Consequently we do not believe that the jury drew an adverse inference from Brown’s association with defendant as developed at trial. … Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 763 , 89 S.Ct. 2034 , 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969); United States v. Kaye, 492 F.2d 744 (6th Cir. 1974); cf. United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 , 94 S.Ct. 467 , 38 L.Ed.2d 427 (1973).
Cited 33 timesPublished
Ask Donna