Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

2.90s

  • Center Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    482 F.3d 425 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 3, 2007

    Programs v. … NLRB v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Medley Distilling Co.

    453 F.2d 374 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 20, 1971

    We consider the application of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order reported at 187 NLRB No. 2 in which the Board found that respondent had violated § 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act … B. v. Gissel Packing, 395 U.S. 575 , 89 S. Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969). For these reasons, we hereby order enforcement of the Board’s order.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Motor Valve & Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    149 F.2d 247 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 14, 1945

    Grieder Mach., Tool & Dye Co., 6 Cir., 142 F.2d 163 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Appalachian Elec. Power Co., 4 Cir., 140 F.2d 217 ; National Labor Relations Board v. The Century Oxford Mfg. … Corporation, 2 Cir., 140 F.2d 541 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Botany Worsted Mills, 3 Cir., 133 F.2d 876 ; Valley Mould & Iron Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 7 Cir., 116 F.2d 760 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Miami Foundry Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    682 F.2d 587 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 7, 1982

    In the case before us, the ALJ found, and the Board agreed, that Miami, A. C. Williams, and Ravenna Inc. were a joint employer. … Boire v. Greyhound Corp., 376 U.S. 473, 481 , 84 S.Ct. 894, 898 , 11 L.Ed.2d 849 (1964). There is ample evidence on this record to support such a finding. Accordingly, the order of the Board is affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Seay v. TVA

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 6, 2003

    v. … See agency has the burden of demonstrating to the board that its Pulley v. Ten n. Valley A uth., 368 F. Supp. 90, 93 (M.D.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Tennessee-Carolina Transportation, Inc.

    226 F.2d 743 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 25, 1955

    v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Adkins Transfer Co., Inc., 6 Cir., 226 F.2d 324 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • General Motors Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    345 F.2d 516 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 27, 1965

    These cases, like Armco Steel Corp. v. NLRB, 6 Cir., 344 F.2d 621 decided April 27, 1965, present the question as to the validity of a no-distribution provision in a collective bargaining agreement. … The order of the Board is set aside in each case.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Clover Fork Coal Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    107 F.2d 1009 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 5, 1939

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sutton v. Cleveland Board Of Education

    958 F.2d 1339 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 19, 1992

    Clark v. … Ramsey v. Board of Educ. of Whitley County, 844 F.2d 1268 , 1272 (6th Cir.1988). In Parratt v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    402 F.3d 651 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 23, 2005

    Hosp. v. NLRB, 328 F.3d 837, 844 (6th Cir. 2003). The Board’s findings of fact, however, are upheld “if supported by substantial evidence on the record.” Kamtech, Inc. v. … NLRB v. Brown Food Store, 380 U.S. 278, 287-88 (1965).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. McCann Steel Company, Inc.

    448 F.2d 277 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 14, 1971

    In this setting, the law seems clear that the Board must demonstrate that the remarks were made with some intent that they be overheard. Colecraft Manufacturing Co. v. N. L. R. B., 385 F.2d 998 (2d Cir. 1967). … The company’s argument that the union had not yet been certified is unavailing; the Board’s order will be enforced on this point. See King Radio Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 398 F.2d 14 (10th Cir. 1968); N. L. R. B. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Marion Manufacturing Company v. W. B. Long, D/B/A W. B. Long Company, and Robert Manning, Jr., D/B/A Webb Cotton Company

    588 F.2d 538 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 12, 1978

    On August 11, 1976, Chief District Judge Bailey Brown entered an order confirming the arbitration award. … Amicizia Societa Navegazione v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. I. F. Sales Co.

    188 F.2d 931 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 23, 1951

    The above cause coming on to be heard on the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel; and it appearing that the findings of the National Labor Relations Board that employee John Wherley … See National Labor Relations Board v. Wiltse, 6 Cir., 188 F.2d 917 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Vulcan Forging Co., 6 Cir., 188 F.2d 927 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. The Duriron Company, Inc.

    978 F.2d 254 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 27, 1992

    The Board has thus voided ballots marked with a capital “H”, NLRB v. … NLRB v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Bersted Mfg. Co.

    128 F.2d 738 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 6, 1942

    The only violation of Sec. 8(1) alleged by the Board, is that resulting from the discharge of Frisch; but the Board found that, by such discharge, the company had also violated Sec. 8(3), in discouraging membership in the … The Board’s petition for rehearing, being addressed to matters remedied in the foregoing amendment, is, accordingly, denied.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Triangle Electric Co.

    83 F. App'x 116 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 8, 2003

    JUDGMENT THIS CAUSE came on to be heard upon an application filed by the National Labor Relations Board, to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board in Board Case Nos. 7-CA-39041, 7-CA-40075, 2001 WL 1126578 … On October 14, 2003, the Court, being fully advised of the premises, handed down its opinion granting enforcement in part of the Board’s order with respect to the unfair labor practices not challenged in the Board’s order

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sloan v. Tenth School District Of Wilson County

    433 F.2d 587 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 13, 1970

    Dismissal will ordinarily be inconsistent with the responsibility imposed on the District Courts by Brown II, (Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 ) (cites). … Kelley v. Altheimer, 378 F.2d 483 , 496 (8th Cir. 1967); United States v. Board of Public Instruction of Polk County, 395 F.2d 66, 69 (5th Cir. 1968); Brewer v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. E & B Brewing Co.

    276 F.2d 594 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 5, 1960

    National Labor Relations Board, 9 Cir., 276 F.2d 63 . This court, in National Labor Relations Board v. F. H. … National Labor Relations Board v. Swinerton, 9 Cir., 202 F.2d 511 ; Del E. Webb Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 8 Cir., 196 F.2d 841, 846 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Jeff Lowery v. Jefferson County Board of Educ

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 12, 2009

    See Brown v. Crowley, 312 F.3d 782, 788 (6th Cir. 2002).) We give fresh review to the denial of the motion for a judgment as a matter of law and abuse-of-discretion review to the motion for a new trial. … Page 10 a reasonable degree of clarity,” Roberts v. U.S. Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609, 629 (1984), the board’s policy satisfies that standard.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ashley v. Board of Sup'rs of Presque Isle County

    83 F. 534 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 7, 1897

    In Stanley v. Board, 15 Fed. 483 , the court said: “The demands in suit were first assigned to Mr. C. P. Williams, a citizen of ■this stale. Williams thereafter assigned to tlie plaintiff. … Hanson v. Eustace, 2 How. 653 ; 3 Tayl. Ev. (9th Ed.) § 1467; Lloyd v. Passingham, 16 Ves. 64. And, further, the defendant cannot be permitted in this indirect method to discredit its own witness.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.