Case law

Thomas J. Quinn v. John F. Shirey, City Manager City of Cincinnati Robert Bedinghaus John Dowlin Thomas Neyer David Krings Hamilton County

293 F.3d 315 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 10, 2002

Brown v. City of Niota, 214 F.3d 718, 722-23 (6th Cir.2000) (citing Ludwig v. Bd. of Trustees, 123 F.3d 404, 410 (6th Cir.1997)). … See Brown, 214 F.3d at 723 ; see also Shealy v. Caldwell, No. 99-3330, 2001 WL 873626 , at * 7, 16 Fed.Appx. 388 (6th Cir.

National Labor Relations Board v. Wehr Constructors, Inc.

159 F.3d 946 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 26, 1998

Therefore, relying on Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. … Wehr argues that under First National Maintenance Corp. v.

Standard Oil Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

322 F.2d 40 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 29, 1963

Where undisputed facts are open to more than one inference this Court is bound to accept the inference drawn by the Board. We may not draw another inference, even though we think it is more logical. N. L. R. B. v. … B. v. Sunbeam Electric Mfg. Co., 133 F.2d 856, 860 , C.A.7; N. L. R. B. v. Blanton Co., 121 F.2d 564, 571 , C.A.8; N. L. R. B. v. New Era Die Co., Inc., 118 F.2d 500, 504 , C.A.3; N. L. R. B. v.

Robert Frumkin v. Board of Trustees, Kent State University

626 F.2d 19 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 18, 1980

After deliberation, the Board of Trustees voted 5-2 to terminate Frumkin's employment. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). The narrow issue is, therefore, whether procedural due process required the University to permit Dr.

Cohn v. Brown

161 F. App'x 450 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 14, 2005

BROWN, ) DAVID S. KENNEDY, and ) JENNIE D. … Grendell v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Henry Vogt MacHine Company

718 F.2d 802 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 10, 1983

Before us for review is the question of whether the Board’s conclusions are supported by substantial evidence in the record considered as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. … International Ladies Garment Workers Un *807 ion V. N.L.R.B., 463 F.2d 907 , 918 (D.C.Cir. 1972).

National Labor Relations Board v. Belfry Coal Corporation

331 F.2d 738 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 6, 1964

The Company challenges the allowance of interest by the Board. This Court has heretofore determined that an allowance of interest is discretionary with the Board. Philip Carey Mfg. Co. Miami Cabinet Division v. N. L. R. … -C.I.O. v. N. L. R. B., 320 F.2d 757 , 760-761, C.A.D.C. Viewing the record as a whole we conclude that the order of the Board is supported by substantial evidence. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R.

Dennis M. Wolfel, Cross-Appellant v. Herbert Bates, Gary Brown, Cross-Appellees

707 F.2d 932 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 3, 1983

Wolfel appealed Brown’s decision to the prison rules infraction board, which upheld the hearing officer’s action. … Inasmuch as Bates and Brown were properly held liable for violating Wolfel’s constitutional rights, the district court’s award of nominal damages should be affirmed. See Carey v.

National Labor Relations Board v. The Detroit Edison Company

560 F.2d 722 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 10, 1977

In Shell Oil Company v. … Because of its experience in such matters and its administrative competence the Board is vested with a broad discretion in fashioning remedies. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v.

Geier v. University of Tennessee

597 F.2d 1056 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 13, 1979

Sixteen years before its decision in Brown v. … The teachings of numerous decisions beginning with Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955) (Brown II), are to the contrary.

National Labor Relations Board v. Gafner Automotive & MacHine, Inc.

400 F.2d 10 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 16, 1968

We hold that the Board’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence, and we proceed to the matters of the union’s fee reduction and misrepresentations. In N.L.R.B. v. … See N.L.R.B. v. Gorbea, Perez & Morell, S. en C., 328 F.2d 679 (1st Cir. 1964).

Williams Ex Rel. Allen v. Cambridge Board of Education

370 F.3d 630 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 4, 2004

Breeding v. … Corp. v.

Wagoner Transportation Company v. National Labor Relations Board

424 F.2d 628 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 20, 1970

Petitioner, Wagoner Transportation Company, seeks to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board which the Board seeks to enforce. The order is reported at 177 N.L.R.B. No. 22. … Enforcement of the order of the Board is granted.

National Labor Relations Board v. Elias Brothers Restaurants, Inc.

496 F.2d 1165 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 29, 1974

B. v. Washington Aluminum Co., supra, at 16. The factual issue determined by the Board was respondent’s motivation in discharging Miss Clark and the general counsel had the burden of proof. N. L. R. B. v. … Enforcement of the Board’s order is granted.

Northcross v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools

489 F.2d 19 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 4, 1973

Appellees seek costs and attorneys’ fees in this case and in the dispute involving the School Board’s gasoline supply. … Finally, appellees cite Northcross v. Memphis Board of Education, 412 U.S. 427 , 93 S.Ct. 2201 , 37 L.Ed.2d 48 (1973), to buttress their claim.

Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

402 F.3d 651 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 23, 2005

Hosp. v. NLRB, 328 F.3d 837, 844 (6th Cir. 2003). The Board’s findings of fact, however, are upheld “if supported by substantial evidence on the record.” Kamtech, Inc. v. … NLRB v. Brown Food Store, 380 U.S. 278, 287-88 (1965).

National Labor Relations Board v. McCann Steel Company, Inc.

448 F.2d 277 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 14, 1971

In this setting, the law seems clear that the Board must demonstrate that the remarks were made with some intent that they be overheard. Colecraft Manufacturing Co. v. N. L. R. B., 385 F.2d 998 (2d Cir. 1967). … The company’s argument that the union had not yet been certified is unavailing; the Board’s order will be enforced on this point. See King Radio Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 398 F.2d 14 (10th Cir. 1968); N. L. R. B. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. The Duriron Company, Inc.

978 F.2d 254 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 27, 1992

The Board has thus voided ballots marked with a capital “H”, NLRB v. … NLRB v.

Sullivan Electric Company v. National Labor Relations Board

479 F.2d 1270 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 19, 1973

In these cases the Board was engaged in interpreting the effect of the Supreme Court’s decision in NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969). … v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Triangle Electric Co.

83 F. App'x 116 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 8, 2003

JUDGMENT THIS CAUSE came on to be heard upon an application filed by the National Labor Relations Board, to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board in Board Case Nos. 7-CA-39041, 7-CA-40075, 2001 WL 1126578 … On October 14, 2003, the Court, being fully advised of the premises, handed down its opinion granting enforcement in part of the Board’s order with respect to the unfair labor practices not challenged in the Board’s order