Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

0.45s

  • Morris v. Michigan State Board Of Education

    472 F.2d 1207 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 25, 1973

    Morris, her next friend, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. … Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71, 75-76 , 92 S.Ct. 251 , 30 L.Ed.2d 225 (1971). See also LaFleur v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Stackhouse Oldsmobile, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    330 F.2d 559 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 10, 1964

    Though we fail to find such language in the Second Circuit case also cited by the Board, N. L. R. B. v. … Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 488 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953). * Suppose the agreement called for particularly manifest outlawed conduct.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • W. J. Ruscoe Company v. National Labor Relations Board

    406 F.2d 725 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 7, 1969

    National Labor Relations Board v. Robinson, 251 F.2d 639 (6th Cir. 1958). However, a striking eim ployee’s misconduct may justify an employer’s refusal to reinstate. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (c). … Oneita Knitting Mills, Inc. v. N. L. R. B., supra; National Labor Relations Bd. v. Longview Furniture Co., 206 F.2d 274 (4th Cir. 1953).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Wyandotte Savings Bank v. The National Labor Relations Board

    682 F.2d 119 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 7, 1982

    Following our order refusing enforcement of an NLRB order to bargain on the ground that the bargaining unit found by the Board was inappropriate, Wyandotte Savings Bank v. … Moreover, the Board has operated under a presumption that a single location in a multiple location business is an appropriate bargaining unit and this presumption has been recognized by this circuit. See NLRB v.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Valley Die Cast Corporation

    303 F.2d 64 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 23, 1962

    The Board’s action was in accord with the law. N. L. R. B. v. Deena Artware, Inc., 198 F.2d 645, 652 (C.A. 6) cert. den. 345 U.S. 906 , 73 S.Ct. 644 , 97 L.Ed. 1342 ; N. L. R. B. v. Mt. … B. v. Lummus Co., 5 Cir., 210 F.2d 377, 381 ; N. L. R. B. v. Anchor Rome Mills, 5 Cir., 228 F.2d 775, 780 ; Piasecki Aircraft Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 3 Cir., 280 F.2d 575 , 585, 590.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Rockwell-Standard Corp.

    410 F.2d 953 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 29, 1969

    B. v. Acme Industrial Co., 385 U.S. 432, 437 , 87 S.Ct. 565, 568 , 17 L.Ed.2d 495 (1967). We cannot say that the Board was wrong in making the finding that the desired information was relevant. … The Board correctly found, however, that there was no “clear and unmistakable” waiver of the right to bargain on these questions. N.L.R.B. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Mink-Dayton, Inc.

    416 F.2d 327 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 17, 1969

    N.L.R.B. v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., et al., 395 U.S. 575 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969). … The Board decided this question prior to the Supreme Court’s ruling in N.L.R.B. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Awrey Bakeries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    548 F.2d 138 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 11, 1977

    remedy within the prerogative of the Board. … It is ORDERED that the order of the Board be and hereby is enforced.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jmc Transport, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    776 F.2d 612 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 12, 1985

    Causley, Inc. v. … Jim Causley Pontiac v. NLRB, 620 F.2d 122, 124 (6th Cir.1980). . The validity of the Board's new definition of section 7 concerted activity has yet to be judicially upheld. In Prill v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Kentucky Fire Brick Co.

    99 F.2d 89 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 29, 1938

    National Labor Relations Board, 58 S.Ct. 656 , 82 L.Ed. 954 , decided by the Supreme Court, March 28, 1938; National Labor Rel. Board v. … Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, 58 S.Ct. 571 , 82 L.Ed. 831 , 115 A.L.R. 307 , decided by the Supreme Court February 28, 1938; and Washington Coach Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • The Exchange Bank v. National Labor Relations Board

    732 F.2d 60 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 16, 1984

    In NLRB v. … Decision of the Board at 10 (footnotes omitted). The Board’s analysis included citations to NLRB v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. U. S. Truck Co.

    124 F.2d 887 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 16, 1942

    National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U.S. 584 , 61 S.Ct. 358 , 85 L.Ed. 368 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … In view of the decisions cited in that case (National Labor Relations Board v. Bradford Dyeing Ass’n, supra; International A. of M. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Hickman Garment Company v. National Labor Relations Board

    497 F.2d 1339 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 4, 1974

    B. v. … Hickman Garment Co. v. N. L. R. B., 408 F.2d 379 (6th Cir. 1969).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Singalong, Inc.

    652 F.2d 609 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 6, 1981

    Decision and Order of the Board are reported at 239 N.L.R.B. No. 170. … It is therefore ORDERED that the decision of the Board be and the same is hereby affirmed and its order be and the same is hereby enforced.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Interurban Gas Corporation

    401 F.2d 744 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 21, 1968

    The Board reported that immediately after the hearing on April 18, 1968, respondent Hemphill tendered to the attorney for the Board a check for $11,322.97 as an offer to the Board in full settlement of the total outstanding … award or such part thereof as the Board may accept in full or partial satisfaction thereof.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lillard v. Shelby County Board of Education

    76 F.3d 716 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 21, 1996

    Little, individually and as parents and next friends of minor child, Lori Briana Little, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SHELBY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; James R. … Board of Regents of Kansas, 991 F.2d 628, 631 (10th Cir.1993); Frazier v. Garrison I.S.D., 980 F.2d 1514, 1520-22 (5th Cir.1993); Chambers v. Omaha Pub. Sch. Dist., 536 F.2d 222 , 225 n. 2 (8th Cir.1976).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

    146 F.2d 718 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 8, 1944

    Marlin-Rockwell Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 116 F.2d 586, 587 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Delaware-New Jersey Ferry Co., 3 Cir., 128 F.2d 130, 137 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … In National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Muncy Corporation

    519 F.2d 169 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 14, 1975

    The issues presented all involve sufficiency of the evidence questions, and in each area of concern the Board approved and adopted the findings of the administrative law judge. … Universal Camera Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). Enforcement of the order is granted.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Wyandotte Transportation Co.

    166 F.2d 434 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 1, 1948

    On June 4, 1947, this court filed an opinion 162 F.2d 101 , and entered an order decreeing enforcement of an order of the petitioner, National Labor Relations Board. The respondent filed a petition to rehear. … The court directed that the respondent and the Board file briefs touching the effect of the new Act on the decision of June 4, 1947.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Rolfe v. County Board of Education of Lincoln County

    391 F.2d 77 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 19, 1968

    Wall v. Stanly County Board of Education, supra; Chambers v. Hendersonville City Board of Education, 364 F.2d 189 (4th Cir. 1966); Smith v. … Chambers v. Hendersonville City Board of Education, supra.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.