Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Tennessee Coach Company

237 F.2d 907 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 30, 1956

Despite factual distinctions pointed out by the respondent, we are of the opinion that the Supreme Court’s decision in Brooks v. … See May *908 Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1945, 326 U.S. 376, 392-393 , 66 S.Ct. 203 , 90 L.Ed. 145 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Fuelgas Company, Inc.

674 F.2d 529 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 23, 1982

It is axiomatic that the Board has broad discretion in bargaining unit determinations. Packard Motor Co. v. NLRB, 330 U.S. 485, 491 , 67 S.Ct. 789, 793 , 91 L.Ed. 1040 (1947); South Prairie Construction Co. v. … We recently reached a similar conclusion in Revco, Inc. v. NLRB, 653 F.2d 264 (6th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, we grant enforcement of the Board’s orders.

National Labor Relations Board v. The Wackenhut Corporation

471 F.2d 761 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 24, 1972

National Labor Relations Board v. A. J. Tower Co., 329 U.S. 324, 330 , 67 S.Ct. 324, 328 , 91 L.Ed. 322 (1946). … It is appropriate to note the language used in N.L.R.B. v. A. J.

Gatliff Coal Company v. National Labor Relations Board

953 F.2d 247 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 8, 1992

Brown-Graves Lumber, 949 F.2d 194, 196 (6th Cir.1991). We also use the substantial evidence standard in reviewing the Board’s application of law to the facts. Id. at 196-197 . … Finding of Concerted Action Gatliff first argues that the Board erred in relying exclusively on N.L.R.B. v.

Uniroyal, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

519 F.2d 1342 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 16, 1975

The Board approved and adopted the findings without comment in this regard. … Accordingly, It is ordered that the order of the Board be and it hereby is enforced.

Kimble Glass Company v. National Labor Relations Board

230 F.2d 484 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 29, 1956

The Board, upon undisputed evidentiary facts, found that petitioner’s prohibition of the wearing of union badges by its employees was not justified by exceptional circumstances. See Republic Aviation Corp. v. … The Board’s order, in'the usual form, was a reasonable exercise of its powers. See N.L.R.B. v. Mackay Radio & Tel. Co., 1938, 304 U.S. 333, 348 , 58 S.Ct. 904 , 82 L.Ed. 1381 .

Kitchen Fresh, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

729 F.2d 1513 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 20, 1984

Kitchen Fresh Inc., v. NLRB, 716 F.2d 351 (6th Cir.1983). The petitioner, however, has yet to prevail on the merits of any of its claims. … See Hanrahan v.

Colfor Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

838 F.2d 164 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 31, 1988

P 10,284 COLFOR INC., Petitioner, Cross-Respondent, v. … The Board's remedial authority is "a broad discretionary one, subject to limited judicial review," Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v.

Taylor v. Bell County Board of Education

21 F. App'x 364 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 2, 2001

Clemens v. United States Envtl. Protection Agency, 917 F.2d 908 , 914 (6th Cir.1990). … Brown, 128 F.3d 359, 363 (6th Cir.1997) (citing Mt. Healthy City School Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977)).

Sargi v. Kent City Board of Education

70 F.3d 907 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 1, 1995

In this case, the actions of the Board fail to meet the standard of City of Canton v. Harris of a deliberate choice by a policymaker. … Because we have found that the Board is immune from liability under Ohio Rev.Code § 2744.02(A)(1), there can be no liability on the part of the Board under Section 2744.03. Farra v.

Morrison v. Board of Educ. of Boyd County

507 F.3d 494 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 26, 2007

Carey v. … See, e.g., Reno v.

Hagopian & Sons, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

395 F.2d 947 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 7, 1968

This Court held in National Labor Relations Board v. … In National Labor Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Overseas Motors, Inc.

818 F.2d 517 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 11, 1987

Bagel Bakers Council of Greater New York v. NLRB, 555 F.2d 304 , 305 (2d Cir. *521 1977). The Board is required only to adopt a formula which will give a close approximation of the amount due, see NLRB v. … Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 452 (8th Cir.1963); it need not find the exact amount due. We see no grounds for overturning the Board’s choice of a formula.

Pinette v. Capitol Square Review And Advisory Board

30 F.3d 675 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 25, 1994

See Rosen v. Brown, 970 F.2d 169, 173 (6th Cir.1992). … See, e.g., Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 461-62 , 100 S.Ct. 2286, 2290-91 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980); Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92 , 96, 92 S.Ct. 2286, 2290 , 33 L.Ed.2d 212 (1972); Niemotko v.

Renown Stove Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

90 F.2d 1017 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 2, 1937

Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. -, in the case of National Labor Relations Board v. … . -, and in the case of National Labor Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Ohio Power Company

531 F.2d 1381 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 22, 1976

The Board’s Decision and Order are reported at 216 NLRB No. 177 . The Board based its order on the Company’s refusal to supply information concerning its employees. … After consideration of the record, briefs and oral arguments of counsel, we conclude that the Board’s order is supported by substantial evidence on the record; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Order of the Board be,

National Labor Relations Board v. Fox Painting Company

732 F.2d 554 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 25, 1984

Reference is made to the decision and order of the Board, reported at 263 N.L.R.B. No. 71, for a recitation of pertinent facts. … Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). Accordingly, enforcement of the order of the Board is granted. No costs are taxed. The parties will bear their own costs in this Court.

National Labor Relations Board v. Allen's I.G.A. Foodliner

651 F.2d 438 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 28, 1981

NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., 395 U.S. 575, 618 , 89 S.Ct. 1918, 1942 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969); Vic Tanney Intern., Inc. v. NLRB, 622 F.2d 237 (6th Cir. 1980). … Thus, Allen’s argues that the findings of 8(a)(1) violations are not pursuant to a charge filed with the Board. We disagree. As was aptly stated in NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Falls Dodge, Inc.

431 F.2d 33 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 10, 1970

The Board’s alternative ground for ordering bargaining corresponds to the standard established in NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed. 2d 547 (1969). … Maxwell Company v. NLRB, 414 F.2d 477 (6th Cir. 1969). We decline to decide upon the relevance and effect of the claimed illegality of the strike until the Board has entered findings of fact upon that issue.

Gary S. Mayes v. Nevin C. Trammell, Chairman, Board of Pardons & Paroles, and Members of the Tennessee Parole Board

751 F.2d 175 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 28, 1984

Scott v. Illinois Parole and Pardon Board, 669 F.2d 1185, 1188 (7th Cir.) … Colorado State Board of Adult Parole, 624 F.2d 172, 175 (10th Cir.1980); Jackson v. Reese, 608 F.2d 159, 160 (5th Cir.1979); Cook v. Whiteside, 505 F.2d 32, 34 (5th Cir.1974). Contra Williams v.