Case law

Pinette v. Capitol Square Review And Advisory Board

30 F.3d 675 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 25, 1994

See Rosen v. Brown, 970 F.2d 169, 173 (6th Cir.1992). … See, e.g., Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 461-62 , 100 S.Ct. 2286, 2290-91 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980); Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92 , 96, 92 S.Ct. 2286, 2290 , 33 L.Ed.2d 212 (1972); Niemotko v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Ford Motor Company

683 F.2d 156 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 20, 1982

The more difficult question arises in the Board order requiring the employer to offer Siriani and West supervisory positions. The Board premises this power on a line of cases beginning with NLRB v. … In Golden State Bottling Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. The Gerstenslager Company

487 F.2d 1332 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 13, 1973

His findings of fact and conclusions of law were adopted by the Board. We find there was substantial evidence to support the findings of fact and conclusions of law. … It is therefore ordered that the decision and order of the Board be and it is hereby enforced.

Reichart Furniture Company v. National Labor Relations Board

649 F.2d 397 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 13, 1981

In NLRB v. … This conclusion serves to distinguish this case from Prestolite Wire, supra, and NLRB v. North Electric Co., 644 F.2d 580 (6th Cir. 1981). .

National Labor Relations Board v. Ohio Power Company

531 F.2d 1381 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 22, 1976

The Board’s Decision and Order are reported at 216 NLRB No. 177 . The Board based its order on the Company’s refusal to supply information concerning its employees. … After consideration of the record, briefs and oral arguments of counsel, we conclude that the Board’s order is supported by substantial evidence on the record; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Order of the Board be,

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,071 Ann Brown v. Ferro Corp.

763 F.2d 798 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 7, 1985

Although Brown makes several arguments to the contrary, they are without merit____ In summary, the court finds that Brown’s claims with regard to the severance agreements are inappropriate for judicial resolution under the … See generally Beard v. Elster, 160 A.2d 731 (Del.Ch.1960); Cohen v. Ayers, 449 F.Supp. 298 (N.D.Ill.1978), aff’d 596 F.2d 733 (7th Cir.1979); Auerbach v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Gould, Inc.

570 F.2d 137 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 13, 1978

Petitioner, National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), seeks enforcement of its order finding Respondent, Gould, Inc.

Southern Moldings, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

728 F.2d 805 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 8, 1984

We voted to reconsider en banc this unfair labor practice case primarily to decide the question of whether NLRB v. … other less onerous remedies for correcting unfair labor practices committed by an employer during a union election campaign. 1 We now conclude that we lack jurisdiction of this question under Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Autodie International, Inc.

169 F.3d 378 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 2, 1999

With respect to these findings of unfair labor practices, the Board's Order is therefore entitled to summary affirmance. See NLRB v. Valley Plaza, Inc., 715 F.2d 237, 240-41 (6th Cir.1983); NLRB v. … INS v.

Miller v. Lorain County Board of Elections

141 F.3d 252 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 2, 1998

See also Burdick v. … See Duke v.

Williams v. Cambridge Board of Education

370 F.3d 630 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 4, 2004

.; Gail Allen; David Allen, Plaintiffs-Appellants (02-3200), Zachary Durbin, a minor; Bobbi LaCross, Plaintiffs-Appellants (02-3207), v. CAMBRIDGE BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-3200. … Co. v.

Board of Publication of the Methodist Church D/B/A Methodist Publishing House v. National Labor Relations Board

297 F.2d 379 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 10, 1962

The Board found that the discharge of all three men was motivated by a desire to influence votes in its favor at the expected election. … Thus,, the Board relied upon speculation and surmise and not on established fact.

National Labor Relations Board v. Southern Electronics Co.

430 F.2d 1391 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 16, 1970

National Steel Corp., Great Lakes Steel Division v. NLRB, 415 F.2d 1231 (6th Cir. 1969); Campbell Soup Co. v. NLRB, 380 F.2d 372, 373 (5th Cir. 1967). TRW, Inc., TRW Michigan Division v. … NLRB v. Whitfield Pickle Co., 374 F.2d 576, 582 (5th Cir. 1967); NLRB v. West Side Carpet Cleaning Co., 329 F.2d 758, 761 (6th Cir. 1964). The order of the Board will be enforced in full.

Stackhouse Oldsmobile, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

330 F.2d 559 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 10, 1964

Though we fail to find such language in the Second Circuit case also cited by the Board, N. L. R. B. v. … Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 488 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953). * Suppose the agreement called for particularly manifest outlawed conduct.

Rivers Manufacturing Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

376 F.2d 511 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 9, 1967

The question, thus, for our decision is whether the Board’s finding that Rivers on October 2, 1964, discharged employees Sanders, Haley, Mayberry, Brown and Shelton to discourage membership in a union, was supported “by substantial … We have held that the Board and its examiner may, without direct proof, infer illegal and discriminatory conduct by an employer, N. L. R. B. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Leslie Metal Arts Company, Inc.

509 F.2d 811 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 22, 1975

Cleaver-Brooks Manufacturing Corp. v. … In G & W Electric Specialty Co. v.

Sargi v. Kent City Board Of Education

70 F.3d 907 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 1, 1995

Because we have found that the Board is immune from liability under O HIO REV.CODE Sec. 2744.02(A)(1), there can be no liability on the part of the Board under Section 2744.03. Farra v. … Therefore, the Board is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on plaintiff's state law claims. V.

National Labor Relations Board v. The Wackenhut Corporation

471 F.2d 761 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 24, 1972

National Labor Relations Board v. A. J. Tower Co., 329 U.S. 324, 330 , 67 S.Ct. 324, 328 , 91 L.Ed. 322 (1946). … It is appropriate to note the language used in N.L.R.B. v. A. J.

Tate v. Brown

902 F.2d 35 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 3, 1990

Paul TATE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 246 (1986).

Molina-Crespo v. United States Merit Systems Protection Board

547 F.3d 651 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 24, 2008

See Kraham v. Lippman, 478 F.3d 502, 506 (2d Cir.2007) (citing Clingman v. … See Graham-Humphreys v.