Case law

Gertrude Smith v. Railroad Retirement Board

267 F.2d 369 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 19, 1959

Railroad Retirement Board, 5 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d 51 , certiorari denied 343 U.S. 909 , 72 S.Ct. 640 , 96 L.Ed. 1326 ; Squires v. Railroad Retirement Board, 5 Cir., 1947, 161 F.2d 182 ; Welborn v. … Railroad Retirement Board, 5 Cir., 1945, 151 F.2d 448 ; South v. Railroad Retirement Board, 5 *372 Cir., 1942, 131 F.2d 748 , certiorari denied 317 U.S. 701 , 63 S.Ct. 525 , 87 L.Ed. 561 .

The Travelers Insurance Company v. Mrs. Ada Z. Brown, Individually, and as Natural Tutrix of Ambrose Floyd Brown, Jr., Thomas Harry Brown, Sandra Laverne Brown and Vickie Helen Brown v. John W. Scott v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company

338 F.2d 229 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 4, 1965

BROWN, Individually, and as Natural Tutrix of Ambrose Floyd Brown, Jr., Thomas Harry Brown, Sandra LaVerne Brown and Vickie Helen Brown, Appellee. v. John W. SCOTT, Appellant, v. … Brown subsequently died. 5 Scott filed suit September 18, 1959. Mrs. Brown, individually and as the natural tutrix of the children for Ambrose Brown, filed her complaint three days later.

U.S. v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 21, 1993

See United States v. Kinder, 946 F.2d 362, 366 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 1677 (1992). The facts of this case are clear from the taped conversations. … See United States v. Devine, 934 F.2d 1325, 1339 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 112 S.

City of Gainesville v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co.

20 F.2d 497 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 6, 1927

City of South Houston v. Carman (C. C. A.) 6 F.(2d) 358 ; Slayton & Co. v. Panola County (D. C.) 283 F. 330 ; Scott County v. Advance-Rumley Thresher Co. (C. C. A.) 288 F. 739 , 36 A. L. R. 937; Grimes County v. W. L. … W. 209 ; Evansville v. Dennett, 161 U. S. 434 , 16 S. Ct. 613 , 40 L. Ed. 760 ; City of Belton v. Brown-Crummer Investment Co. (C. C. A.) 17 F.(2d) 70 .

Sewerage & Water Board v. The Cumulus

172 F.2d 102 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 1, 1949

Burgin Bros. & McCane v. Barker Baking Co., 152 La. 1075 , 95 So. 227 ; Pugh v. Flannery, 151 La. 1063 , 92 So. 699 . … Pugh v. Flannery, supra.

Jones v. Caddo Parish School Board

392 F.2d 721 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 27, 1968

It is the obligation of the Board, not the teachers, to bring about faculty integration. This Board is aware of this fáct.” … This is up to each school board. At the beginning of this litigation, each board under consideration proposed for approval of the court a ‘freedom of choice’ plan for desegregation of its schools.

Brown v. Ford Motor Company

481 F.2d 1403 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 6, 1973

481 F.2d 1403 Brown v. Ford Motor Company 72-3100 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit Aug. 6, 1973 M.D.Ga., 479 F.2d 521

Morales v. Board of Adjustments & Appeals

464 F. App'x 324 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 13, 2012

Brumfield v. Louisiana State Board of Education

806 F.3d 289 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 10, 2015

Seven Elves v. … In United States v.

Bennett-Nelson v. Louisiana Board of Regents

431 F.3d 448 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 28, 2005

As we explained in Pace v. Bogalusa City School Board, the core function of the Amendment is to bar the authority of federal courts to litigate suits brought by citizens against the states. … See School Board of Nassau County v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273 , 288 n. 17, 107 S.Ct. 1123 , 94 L.Ed.2d 307 (1987) (quoting Southeastern Community College v.

Doe v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board

478 F.3d 679 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 9, 2007

National Labor Relations Board v. Davis

172 F.2d 225 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 14, 1949

The motion is granted, with recognition of the fact that respondent does not resist, but claims to be in compliance with, the Board’s order.. … The decree to be entered here, therefore, will provide that whatever the respondent has already done toward compliance with the order of the Board prior to entry of this court’s decree will not be required to be redone, and

Taylor Bell v. Itawamba County School Board

774 F.3d 280 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 12, 2014

The School Board alternatively and erroneously attempts to invoke this court’s decision in Ponce v. … See, e.g., Brown v.

Bell v. Itawamba County School Board

782 F.3d 712 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 19, 2015

Pace v. Bogalusa City School Board

325 F.3d 609 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 9, 2003

We affirm the district court’s judgment for the Bogalusa City School Board. … In federal court, Pace brought suit against the Bogalusa City School Board.

Jack White v. South Park Independent School District

693 F.2d 1163 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 20, 1982

Brown v. Bullard Independent School District, supra. Normally, we would remand to the district court for specific findings on whether White’s suit was without merit. … Brown v. Bullard Indep. School Dist., 640 F.2d 651 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 828 , 102 S.Ct. 120 , 70 L.Ed.2d 103 (1981).

James Oliver McAlester Et Ux. v. David H. Brown

469 F.2d 1280 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 5, 1972

Brown. The dis-positive issue is whether on the instant *1281 allegations a suit brought under 42 U.S. C. § 1983 is barred by the doctrine of judicial immunity as enunciated in Pierson v. … See Hurn v. Oursler, 1933, 289 U.S. 238 , 53 S.Ct. 586 , 77 L.Ed. 1148 . Appellants recognize that Pier-son v.

United States v. Hugh Brown and Lewis D. Hayes

451 F.2d 1231 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 23, 1971

Also, in Sanchez v. … See Gradsky v. United States, 5 Cir., 373 F.2d 706 ; Lawn v. United States, 355 U.S. 339 , 78 S.Ct. 311 , 2 L. Ed.2d 231 ; McMillian v. United States, 363 F.2d 165 (5th Cir. 1966); Dunn v.

Partin v. National Labor Relations Board

356 F.2d 512 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 21, 1966

PARTIN, Business Agent, General Truck Drivers, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Local No. 5, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 21970. … The Board requests enforcement of its order.

Lindsey v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

101 F.3d 444 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 17, 1996

See Henderson v. United States, --- U.S. ----, ----, 116 S.Ct. 1638, 1643, 134 L.Ed.2d 880 (1996); Thompson v. Brown, 91 F.3d 20, 21 (5th Cir.1996). … the Board.