Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca5

10,000+ results

1.50s

  • Brown v. O'Connor

    141 F.2d 1019 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 14, 1944

    For the reasons given in Brown, Administrator, v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    690 F. App'x 161 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 30, 2017

    PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Christopher Brown has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. … California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Brown has not filed a response.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    689 F. App'x 381 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 22, 2017

    PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mark Carlos Brown has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. … California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Brown has not filed a response.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Burfield v. Brown, Moore & Flint, Inc.

    51 F.3d 583 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 11, 1995

    BURFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BROWN, MOORE & FLINT, INC., Defendant-Appellee. May 10, 1995. … Burfield filed a civil action against Brown, Moore & Flint, Inc.

    Cited 70 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    668 F. App'x 89 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 16, 2016

    Brown raises an argument that is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. … See United States v. Ogbonna, 184 F.3d-447, 449 & n.1 (5th Cir. 1999).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    22 F.2d 797 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 2, 1927

    This is a petition to review a decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals. D. H. … It is sufficient to say that the findings of fact and conclusions of the board are supported by the record. Avery v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 22 F.(2d) 6 , decided by this court November 1, 1927. Affirmed.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Francisco Villarreal v. Brown Express, Inc.

    529 F.2d 1219 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 5, 1976

    Romick v. Bekins Van & Storage Co., 197 F.2d 369, 370 (5 Cir. 1952), citing Great Northern Ry. Co. v. … United States v.

    Cited 64 timesPublished
  • United States v. Andrew Kennedy Brown

    753 F.2d 455 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 21, 1985

    U.S. v. Dovalina, 711 F.2d 737, 740 (5th Cir.1983). Brown has not alleged that release on state bail while his state charges were pending was prevented solely because of a federal detainer. … Brown’s federal sentence commenced following the declaration of his federal prison term, when he was received at the facility designated for service of his federal sentence. Blackshear v.

    Cited 70 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    143 F.2d 468 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 23, 1944

    Solomon, 9 Cir., 99 F.2d 41 . 3 Kales v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 101 F.2d 35 , 122 A.L.R. 211 ; Miller v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 102 F.2d 476 . 4 In Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U. … Solomon, 9 Cir., 99 F.2d 41 ; Commissioner v. Boeing, 9 Cir., 106 F. 2d 305 , certiorari denied, 308 U.S. 619 , 60 S.Ct. 295 , 84 L.Ed. 517 ; Oliver v. Commissioner, 4 Cir., 138 F.2d 910 ; Greene v.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • United States v. Leroy K. Brown

    941 F.2d 1300 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 6, 1991

    Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410, 419 , 89 S.Ct. 584, 590 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969). A magistrate’s determination is entitled to great deference by reviewing courts. Illinois v. … Jones v.

    Cited 62 timesPublished
  • Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc. And Brown & Root, Inc., Successor to Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc. v. Zapata Off-Shore Company

    377 F.2d 724 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 24, 1967

    The rule of Goldberg v. P. & L. Equip. Co., 5 Cir. 1962, 311 F.2d 88 , is not applicable. On issues of fact, we are bound by the clearly erroneous rule of McAllister v. … Co. v. Brooklyn Eastern Dist. Terminal, 251 U.S. 48 , 40 S.Ct. 66 , 64 L.Ed. 130 (1919); Standard Dredging Co. v. Kristiansen, supra.

    Cited 97 timesPublished
  • United States v. James Bentley Brown

    488 F.2d 94 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 6, 1973

    PER CURIAM: Appellant Brown has pursued this appeal from an order revoking his probation following an evidentiary hearing. … See, Burns v. United States, 287 U.S. 216, 221 , 53 S.Ct. 154, 156 , 77 L.Ed. 266, 269 (1932), and United States v. Garza, 484 F. 2d 88 (5th Cir. 1973).

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Jill Brown v. Bryan County, Ok

    219 F.3d 450 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 18, 2000

    For ease of reference, these are defined as follows: 75 (1) Brown v. Bryan County, 53 F.3d 1410 (5th Cir. 1995) (hereinafter "Brown I") 76 (2) Brown v. … Bryan County, 67 F.3d 1174 (5th Cir. 1995) (hereinafter "Brown II") 77 (3) Board of County Comm'rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 117 S.

    Cited 74 timesPublished
  • Jack Kenneth Brown v. United States

    267 F.2d 42 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 26, 1959

    Bishop v. United States, 1956, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 ; Gregori v. United States, 5 Cir., 1957, 243 F.2d 48 ; Simmons v. United States, 8 Cir., 1958, 253 F.2d 909 ; cf. Massey v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • United States v. Earl Nelvie Brown

    429 F.2d 566 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 24, 1970

    In United States v. Reisinger, 128 U.S. 398 , 9 S.Ct. 99 , 32 L.Ed. 480 (1888), the Supreme Court held that the savings clause should be read in conjunction with the repealing statute. See Great Northern Ry. Co. v. … In Bowen v. United States, 171 F.2d 533, 534 (5 Cir., 1948), this court said: “ * * * We have considered and discussed the applicability of the general savings clause * * * in the case of United States v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • United States v. Stephen Pfeiffer Brown

    692 F.2d 345 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 10, 1982

    VERON, District Judge: This appeal arises from a jury trial at which Stephen Pfeiffer Brown was found guilty on five counts of an indictment. … It was during this telephone interception that the cocaine source was discovered to be appellant, Stephen Pfeiffer Brown.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Kenneth Jordan Brown v. United States

    403 F.2d 489 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 6, 1969

    Wong Tai v. United States, 1927, 273 U.S. 77 , 47 S.Ct. 300 , 71 L.Ed. 545 . See also, United States v. Mixon, 6 Cir., 1967, 374 F.2d 20 ; Davis v. United States, 6 Cir., 1958, 253 F.2d 24 ; Stein v. … trip to McAllen, his stop at Victoria, his earlier exploratory trip, and his meeting with two Latin-Americans; the identification of the parked car as belonging to the courier; *491 and the handing over to appellant of a brown

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Brown Jones v. Lynda A. Landry

    387 F.2d 102 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 11, 1967

    Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. … Again, in a much earlier case, Barry v.

    Cited 55 timesPublished
  • United States v. Mary Cullar Brown

    569 F.2d 236 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 8, 1978

    Brown and Edwin Richard Brown appealed to this court on numerous grounds and a three-judge panel, after oral argument, reversed Mary C. Brown’s conviction and affirmed Edwin Brown’s. United States v. … The defendant relies on Massiah v.

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • United States v. J. Marshall Brown

    634 F.2d 819 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 5, 1981

    In United States v. … In Fountain v.

    Cited 48 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.