Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.38s
Meredith v. Board of Public Instruction for Hernando County
112 F.2d 914 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 25, 1940
Vickery v. Mowat, Fla., 193 So. 751 . … Board of Public Instruction v. Gillespie et al., 5 Cir., 81 F.2d 586 ; Fidelity Life Ass’n v. Board of Public Instruction, 5 Cir., 81 F.2d 586 ; Concordia Ins. Co. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Durant Sportswear, Inc.
358 F.2d 729 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 5, 1966
B. v. Ferguson, 5 Cir., 1958, 257 F.2d 88 , the § 8(a) (1) violations are flagrant. … B. v. American Mfg. Co., 5 Cir., 1965, 351 F.2d 74, 78 , such “anti union bias and demonstrated unlawful hostility” were “proper and highly significant factors for Board evaluation in determining motive,” N. L. R. B. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDixie Bedding Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board
268 F.2d 901 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 30, 1959
B. v. Mc-Gahey, 5 Cir., 1956, 233 F.2d 406 ; N. L. R. B. v. Nabors, 5 Cir., 1952, 196 F.2d 272 , certiorari denied 344 U.S. 865 , 73 S. Ct. 106 , 97 L.Ed. 671 ; N. L. R. B. v. Russell Mfg. … There is substantial evidence to sustain the Board’s conclusion that this conduct constituted interference and support. Cf. N. L. R. B. v. *907 Wemyss, 9 Cir., 1954, 212 F.2d 465 ; Elastic Shop Nut Corp. v. N. L. R.
Cited 19 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Swift Mfg. Co.
192 F.2d 496 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 7, 1951
B. v. Red Rock Co., 5 Cir., 187 F.2d 76 ; N. L. R. B. v. Wiltse, 6 Cir., 188 F.2d 917 ; N. L. R. B. v. Vulcan Forging Co., 6 Cir., 188 F.2d 927 . 2 . But see Hill v. … McCormick v. Sullivant. 10 Wheat. 392 , 6 L.Ed. 300 ; or that there was actually no diversity, Cameron v. McRoberts, 3 Wheat. 591 , 4 L.Ed. 467 ; Dos Moines Navigation & R. Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. American Cable Systems, Inc.
427 F.2d 446 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 23, 1970
NLRB v. American Cable Systems, Inc., 5 Cir. 1969, 414 F.2d 661, 668 . … NLRB v. Katz, 1962, 369 U.S. 736 , 82 S.Ct. 1107 , 8 L.Ed.2d 230 ; NLRB v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc., 1950, 339 U.S. 563 , 70 S.Ct. 826 , 94 L.Ed. 1067 ; Franks Bros Co. v.
Cited 54 timesPublishedT-Mobile USA, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
865 F.3d 265 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 25, 2017
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent - Cross Petitioner Consolidated with 16-60497 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner v. … See NLRB v. Yeshiva Univ., 444 U.S. 672, 691 (1980) (refusing to defer to Board order decided “on the basis of conclusory rationales rather than examination of the facts of each case”); cf. Dresser-Rand Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedThe Berry Schools v. National Labor Relations Board
653 F.2d 966 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 17, 1981
In The Berry Schools v. … NLRB v. United Insurance Co., 390 U.S. 254 , 88 S.Ct. 988 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1083 (1968); NLRB v. O. A. Fuller Super Markets, Inc., 374 F.2d 197 (5th Cir. 1967); NLRB v. Camco, Inc., 369 F.2d 125 (5th Cir. 1966).
Cited 7 timesPublished247 F.2d 268 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 27, 1957
Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 299, 301 , 75 S.Ct. 753, 756 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 ; Avery v. … Brown v. Board of Education, 1955, 349 U.S. 294, 300 , 75 S.Ct. 756 ; School Board of City of Charlottesville, Va. v. Allen, 4 Cir., 1956, 240 F.2d 59, 64 ; Willis v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSkyline Homes, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
381 F.2d 706 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 22, 1967
BROWN, Chief Judge: The National Labor Relations Board petitioned this Court to adjudge Skyline Homes, Inc. in civil contempt because of the alleged disobeyance of a decree entered by this Court on November 22, 1963. 1 That … Skyline Homes, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 5 Cir., 1963, 323 F.2d 642 , cert, denied, 1964, 376 U.S. 909 , 84 S.Ct. 662 , 11 L.Ed.2d 607 . 2 . The order required Skyline to: 1.
Cited 3 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Claxton Manufacturing Company, Inc.
613 F.2d 1364 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 21, 1980
NLRB v. … Brown Steel Co., 230 NLRB No. 153 (1977) (union may not threaten that if it loses, it will reveal to employer names of those who signed authorization cards).
Modified by National Labor Relations Board v. Claxton Manufacturing Company, Inc., 618 F.2d 396 (1980)Cited 33 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Gate City Cotton Mills
167 F.2d 647 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 16, 1948
B. v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp., 306 U.S. 240, 248, 251 , 59 S.Ct. 490 , 83 L.Ed. 627 , 123 A.L.R. 599 ; Glatfelter Co. v. N.L.R.B., 3 Cir., 141 F.2d 631, 632, 633 ; N.L.R.B. v. … Let the order of the Board be enforced.
Cited 15 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Tampa Crown Distributors, Inc.
272 F.2d 470 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 10, 1959
National Labor Relations Board v. Huntsville Mfg. Co., 5 Cir., 1953, 203 F.2d 430, 434 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Dallas City Packing Co., 5 Cir., 1958, 251 F.2d 663, 665 ; Compare Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. … National Labor Relations Board, 1941, 313 U.S. 146, 154, 161 , 61 S.Ct. 908 , 85 L.Ed. 1251 .
Cited 22 timesPublishedLashawnda Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., et
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 14, 2020
See Byers v. … See Fisher v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Moore Dry Kiln Company
320 F.2d 30 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 3, 1963
Following this, the company sent a letter to all employees advising that they could write the Board and request that their cards be considered null and void. Cf. N. L. R. B. v. … See American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations Board, 1940, 308 U.S. 401 , 60 S.Ct. 300 , 84 L.Ed. 347 ; Bonwit Teller, Inc. v. N. L. R.
Cited 28 timesPublishedA. T. Garrett v. National Transportation Safety Board
431 F.2d 877 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 24, 1970
GARRETT, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD, Respondent. No. 29317 Summary Calendar. ** United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. August 24, 1970. Alton T. Garrett, pro se. William D. … This was a reasonable interpretation of the regulation. 3 The order of the National Transportation Safety Board is affirmed. Notes: ** [1] Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Better Monkey Grip Company
243 F.2d 836 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 29, 1957
B. v. Tallade-ga Cotton Factory, Inc., 5 Cir., 213 F.2d 209, 215-217 , 40 A.L.R.2d 404 ], and that a contrary conclusion is not required by Section 8(a) (4) of the Act. Compare Pedersen v. N. L. R. … The Board’s decision and order are reported at 115 N.L.R.B. No. 180.
Cited 15 timesPublishedCone Brothers Contracting Company v. National Labor Relations Board
235 F.2d 37 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 20, 1956
BROWN, Circuit Judge. In the Employer’s petition for review of the findings 1 and Order 2 of the Board, the principal attack, deferred of necessity to this time, Volney Felt Mills, Inc., v. … B. v.
Cited 26 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Strain Poultry Farms, Inc.
405 F.2d 1025 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 3, 1969
Chapman v. Durkin, 214 F.2d 360 (5th Cir., 1954); Fort Mason Fruit Co. v. Durkin, 214 F.2d 363 (5th Cir., 1954). Here, Strain raised the chickens. It did not buy them. … NLRB v. Olaa Sugar Co., (9th Cir., 1957) 242 F.2d 714 . 2 . The court said that the decisions in this circuit in Nix v. Farmers Mutual Exchange, 218 F.2d 642 (5th Cir., 1955) and Mitchell v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Dino Boutiques, Inc.
425 F.2d 818 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 18, 1970
The Board’s Decision and Order are reported at 173 NLRB No. 174 . … The Board ordered the Company to cease and desist from the unlawful conduct found.
Cited 1 timesPublished997 F.3d 275 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 7, 2021
The next succeeding board was convened on March 1, and she was fired the next day. In short, Watkins was fired as immediately after her protected activity as established procedures would allow. See Brown v. … See, e.g., Brown, 969 F.3d at 579 (temporal proximity of about six weeks); United States ex rel King v.
Cited 83 timesPublished
Ask Donna