Case law

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

113 F.2d 85 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 24, 1940

On April 12, 1937, the Supreme Court decided the case of National Labor Relations Board v. … Grieff & Bro. v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 108 F.2d 551 ; National Labor Relations Board v. *93 Swank Products Co., 3 Cir., 108 F.2d 872 ; and Magnolia Petroleum Co. v.

New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Brown

510 F.2d 1407 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 19, 1975

510 F.2d 1407 New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Brown 74-1697 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 3/19/75 E.D.La., 507 F.2d 160

National Labor Relations Board v. Marinor Inns, Incorporated

445 F.2d 538 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 14, 1971

NLRB v. WGOK, 5 Cir. 1967, 384 F.2d 500 ; NLRB v. National Survey Serv., Inc., 7 Cir. 1966, 361 F.2d 199 ; NLRB v. Carroll-Naslund Disposal, Inc., 9 Cir. 1966, 359 F.2d 779 ; NLRB v. … When this principle against relitigation is applicable, as it is here, the Board’s use of summary judgment is clearly permissible. NLRB v. Clement-Blythe Companies, 4 Cir. 1969, 415 F.2d 78 ; NLRB v.

Western Water Management, Inc. v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 15, 1994

WESTERN WATER MANAGEMENT, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles P. BROWN, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Dec. 15, 1994. … Williams v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Houston Maritime Ass'n

426 F.2d 584 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 12, 1970

In reviewing the decision of the Board that they were, we are bound, of course, by the substantial evidence rule of Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 1951, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 . … Packers, Inc., 5 Cir. 1968, 398 F.2d 640 ; Boaz Spinning Co. v. NLRB, 5 Cir. 1968, 395 F.2d 512 ; NLRB v. O. A. Fuller Super Markets, Inc., 5 Cir. 1967, 374 F.2d 197 ; Dobbs Houses, Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Texas Industries, Inc.

426 F.2d 812 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 14, 1970

PER CURIAM: Pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act as amended ( 61 Stat. 136 , 73 Stat. 519 , 29 U.S.C., Sec. 151 , et seq.), the petitioner (Board) seeks enforcement of its February 19, 1969 decision … Accordingly, we direct that the Board’s order be Enforced. 1 . Reported at 174 NLRB No. 83 . 2 . International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 819, AFL-CIO.

National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Oil & Gas Co.

99 F.2d 56 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 20, 1938

Even now, the Board gives the court no assuranee that the notices have not been posted. … If the Board or the court intended for one of them to be discharged, it should have so stated, The intention is not clear from the order, The Board itself has never indicated that the discharge of one of them to make room

National Labor Relations Board v. Florida Steel Corporation

544 F.2d 896 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 3, 1977

Consequently, we set aside the Board’s order requiring Florida Steel to reinstate Roach. See News-Texan, Inc. v. NLRB, 5 Cir., 1970, 422 F.2d 381 . … Given the company’s recent history of unlawful conduct in connection with organizational efforts by the United Steel Workers, 4 the Board’s remedies were unquestionably proper. See J. P. Stevens & Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. McEver Engineering, Inc.

784 F.2d 634 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 10, 1986

Brown & Root, Inc. v. NLRB, 634 F.2d 816 (5th Cir.1981). Here the alleged protected activity is the right to engage in a work stoppage as a means of protesting an unsafe working condition. … In addition, we note that the facts in this case are in all significant respects identical to those of NLRB v. Service Machine & Shipbuilding Corp., 662 F.2d 1125 (5th Cir.1981) and Brown <& Root, Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Southeastern Stages, Inc.

423 F.2d 878 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 2, 1970

We think this rule adopted by the Board is appropriate to accomplish the Act’s purpose with fairness to all concerned.” Wallace Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 323 U.S. 248, 254-255 , 65 S.Ct. 238, 241 , 89 L.Ed. 216, 226-227 . … N.L.R.B. v. Bangor Plastics, Inc., 6th Cir. 1957, 392 F.2d 772 ; N.L.R.B. v. Dressmakers Joint Council, etc., 2d Cir. 1965, 342 F.2d 988 ; Lincoln Bearing Co. v. N.L.R.B., 6th Cir. 1962, 311 F.2d 48 ; N.L.R.B. v.

Jeremiah Blackwell, Jr. v. Issaquena County Board of Education

363 F.2d 749 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 21, 1966

In Dennis v. … In West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

129 F.2d 661 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 6, 1942

B. v. … Co. v. Chamberlain, 288 U.S. 333 , 53 S.Ct. 391 , 77 L.Ed. 819 , and the ruling is applicable to the Board as fact-finder.” In N. L. R. B. v. Nevada Consol.

National Labor Relations Board v. Superior Protection, Inc.

401 F.3d 282 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 16, 2005

NLRB v. … NLRB v.

Jackson Municipal Separate School District v. Evers

357 F.2d 653 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 26, 1966

More than ten years have passed since Brown v. Board of Education, 1954, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 . … Allen v. Brown, 1964, 379 U.S. 825 , 85 S.Ct. 52 , 13 L.Ed.2d 35 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Oil & Gas Co.

98 F.2d 406 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 29, 1938

Hearsay and non-expert-opinion evidence may not be used in this court as a basis to support the findings of .the Board upon which rests an order sought to be enforced. Cf. United States v. … Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 93 F.2d 985 . The petition to enforce the order of the Board is denied and the order, set aside. 1 National Labor Relations Board v.

Brown v. Astrue

344 F. App'x 16 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 2, 2009

BROWN Plaintiff-Appellant v. MICHAEL J. … Brown v. Apfel, 192 F.3d 492, 495 (5th Cir. 1999). 20 C.F.R. § 404.957(c)(1).

National Labor Relations Board v. Mid-Co Gasoline Co.

183 F.2d 451 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 17, 1950

N.L.R.B. v. Bradford Dyeing Ass’n, 310 U.S. 318, 326 , 60 S.Ct. 918 , 84 L.Ed. 1226 ; J. L. Brandeis & Sons v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 142 F.2d 977, 980 , certiorari denied 323 U.S. 751 , 65 S.Ct. 85 , 89 L.Ed. 601 . … Pueblo Gas & Fuel Co. v. N.L.R.B., 10 Cir., 118 F.2d 304, 306 .” We agree with these conclusions. In N.L.R.B. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Golden Age Beverage Company

415 F.2d 26 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 7, 1969

Most important is the wide discretion Congress has entrusted to the Board in its conduct and supervision of elections, N.L.R.B. v. … B. v.

Waterman S. S. Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

119 F.2d 760 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 2, 1941

Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court, National Labor Relations Board v. Waterman S. S. … Agwilines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 87 F.2d 146, 147 . The Board alone may enforce its order. Amalgamated Utility Workers v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Houston Chronicle Pub. Co.

211 F.2d 848 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 9, 1954

See Martel Mills Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 4 Cir., 114 F.2d 624 ; N. L. R. B. v. Union Pacific Stages, 9 Cir., 99 F.2d 153 ; N. L. R. B. v. Grace Co., 8 Cir., 184 F.2d 126 ; 152 A.L.R. 149 , et seq. … Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456, 465 , 95 L.Ed. 456 .