Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.69s
National Labor Relations Board v. Huntsville Mfg. Co.
203 F.2d 430 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 13, 1953
Congress entrusted to the. board the control of the election proceedings and.the determination of the steps necessary to conduct an election. N. L. R. B. v. … Pittsburgh Plate Glass v. N. L. R. B., 313 U.S. 146, 149 , 61 S.Ct. 908 , 85 L.Ed. 1251 ; N. L. R. B. v. Capitol Greyhound Lines, 6 Cir., 140 F.2d 754 .
Cited 24 timesPublishedLee v. Macon County Board of Education
650 F.2d 608 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 13, 1981
Carter v. Feliciana Parish School Board, 396 U.S. 226 , 90 S.Ct. 467 , 24 L.Ed.2d 382 (Black, Circuit Justice, 1969), rev’d in part on other grounds sub nom. Carter v. … West Feliciana Parish School Board, 396 U.S. 290 , 90 S.Ct. 608 , 24 L.Ed.2d 477 (1970), cert. denied sub nom. West Feliciana Parish School Board v. Carter, 396 U.S. 1032 , 90 S.Ct. 611 , 24 L.Ed.2d 530 (1970). .
Cited 2 timesPublishedOrleans Parish School Board v. Asbestos Corp.
114 F.3d 66 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 22, 1997
Article 3492 of the Civil Code provides the applicable prescriptive period for 1 Songbyrd, Inc. v. … In Cameron Parish School Board v. Acands, Inc.5 the Cameron Parish School Board sued asbestos manufacturers to recover the costs of removing asbestos from its school buildings.
Cited 9 timesPublishedRyan-Walsh Stevedoring Co. v. Trainer
601 F.2d 1306 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 10, 1979
In defining the term “in loco parentis” the Board looked to Texas Employers’ Insurance Association v. Shea, 410 F.2d 56 (5th Cir. 1969), and Ingalls Shipbuilding Corp. v. … V.
Cited 8 timesPublishedPruett v. Harris County Bail Bond Board
489 F.3d 217 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 7, 2007
The trial court held the rules unconstitutional, see Harris County Bail Bond Board v. Pruett, No. 01-02-01043-CV, 2004 WL 2307362 (Tex. App.-Houston [1 Dist.] … Although we don’t pass on the question, we note that § 37.02(a)(2) seems to cover bail bonding, as the .Texas Court of Appeals held .in Pruett’s related case, see Harris County Bail Bond Board v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBeets v. Texas Board of Pardons & Paroles
205 F.3d 192 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 24, 2000
Faulder v. Johnson, 178 F.3d 741 (1999); Moody v. Rodriguez, 164 F.3d 893 (5th Cir. 1999). … Gomez v. United States District Court of the Northern District of California, 503 U.S. 653, 653-54, 112 S.Ct. 1652, 1653 (1993).
Cited 8 timesPublishedHalliburton Company v. National Labor Relations Board
409 F.2d 496 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 21, 1969
Co. v. NLRB, 5 Cir. 1969, 407 F.2d 247 (No. 25401, January 24, 1969). … See NLRB v. Dell, 5 Cir. 1960, 283 F.2d 733, 739 . It should be emphasized fur ther that the Board did not upset credibility determinations of the Examiner.
Cited 4 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Auto Ventshade, Inc.
276 F.2d 303 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 28, 1960
In this case, as in National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Alamo White Truck Service, supra; National Labor Relations Board v. Armato, 7 Cir., 1952, 199 F.2d 800 .
Cited 45 timesPublishedTectrans, Inc. v. New Orleans Aviation Board
464 F. App'x 199 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 10, 2010
Cited 0 timesPublishedArmstrong Cork Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
211 F.2d 843 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 31, 1954
B. v. Berkley Machine W. & F. Co., 4 Cir., 189 F.2d 904, 907 ; cf. N. L. R. B. v. J. H. … Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 . The order of the Board is Enforced. 1 .
Cited 29 timesPublishedSinclair Refining Company v. National Labor Relations Board
306 F.2d 569 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 26, 1962
BROWN, Circuit Judge. Time and tide, it is said, waits for no man. Neither does the law. … While Congress has, of course, presumably infused an expertise in the members of the Labor Board with respect to matters committed to its jurisdiction, Garner v.
Cited 22 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Alco Feed Mills
133 F.2d 419 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 15, 1943
These principles, which apply in testing whether the evidence will support a jury verdict, apply to the findings of the Board. National Labor Relations Board v. … Columbian Co., 306 U.S. 292, 300 , 59 S.Ct. 501 , 83 L.Ed. 660 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Tex-O-Kan Mills Co., 5 Cir., 122 F.2d 433, 438 .
Cited 16 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Tex-Tan, Inc.
318 F.2d 472 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 24, 1963
BROWN, Circuit Judge. … See Labor Board [N. L. R. B.] v. Bradley Washfountain Co. [C.A.7] 192 F.2d 144, 150-152 ; Labor Board [N. L. R. B.] v. Landis Tool Co., (C.A.3) 193 F.2d 279 .” 22 .
Cited 54 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Montag Bros.
140 F.2d 730 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 3, 1944
A careful consideration of all the evidence leads to the conclusion, and we so find, that there was substantial evidence to warrant the Board in its findings and conclusions. N. L. R. B. v. Express Pub. … B. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co., 4 Cir., 120 F.2d 532 ; Owens-Illinois Glass Co. v. N. L. R. B., 6 Cir., 123 F.2d 670 ; N. L. R. B. v. Abbott Worsted Mills, 1 Cir., 127 F.2d 438 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedKennedy v. Tangipahoa Parish Library Board of Control
224 F.3d 359 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 21, 2000
Benningfield, 157 F.3d at 374; see also Brown v. … Neither Sledge nor the Board had to interact with Kennedy on a day-to-day basis. Cf. Pickering v. Board of Educ. of Township High Sch.
Abrogated on other grounds by Cuvillier v. Taylor, 503 F.3d 397 (2007)Cited 106 timesPublishedLee v. MacOn County Board of Education
463 F.2d 1174 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 17, 1972
The Board's use of the National Teachers Examination as one of the factors for consideration in the nonracial objective criteria was not improper. Cf. United States v. … Singleton, supra; United States v. Texas Education Agency, 5 Cir., 1972, 459 F.2d 600 ; Horton v. Lawrence County Board of Education, 5 Cir., 1971, 449 F.2d 793 ; Lee v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedRyan-Walsh Stevedoring Co., Inc. v. Trainer
601 F.2d 1306 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 10, 1979
In defining the term "in loco parentis" the Board looked to Texas Employers' Insurance Association v. Shea, 410 F.2d 56 (5th Cir. 1969), and Ingalls Shipbuilding Corp. v. … V.
Cited 7 timesPublishedLee v. Roanoke City Board of Education
466 F.2d 1378 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 28, 1972
In Singleton v. … On June 24, 1970, the three-judge district court transferred the Lee v. Macon County cases to single judges. Lee v. Randolph County Board of Education became C.A. No. 847-E and Lee v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMaitland E. Brown v. United States
373 F.2d 511 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 21, 1967
Brown v. United States, 5th Cir. 1963, 318 F.2d 404 . … Despite the commendable efforts of counsel, however, we feel that disposition of the appeal in a manner contrary to petitioner’s position is clearly dictated by this Court’s opinion in Henley v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Gibbs Corporation
284 F.2d 403 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 22, 1960
This is a petition for enforcement of a Board order for the reinstatement of an employee whose discharge the Board finds-to have been a violation of Section 8(a) (1) of the Labor Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158 (a) (1). … B. v. Redwing Carriers, 5 Cir., 284 F.2d 397 . Others pointing out the guiding, legal principles are N. L. R. B. v. McGahey, 5 Cir., 233 F.2d 406 , and N. L. R. B. v. Coats & Clark, Inc., 5 Cir., 231 F.2d 567 .
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna