Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Southwire Company

313 F.2d 638 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 6, 1963

sustain the Board’s findings. … No purpose would be served by a recital of the evidence or of the fact issues which were resolved by the Board. There is substantial evidence to support the findings. The Board’s order will be Enforced.

United States v. Board of Education

469 F.2d 1315 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 30, 1972

Meridian Municipal Separate School District, 5 Cir. 1971, 453 F.2d 413 ; Moore v. Winfield City Board of Education, 5 Cir. 1971, 452 F.2d 726 . … Appellant also rather vaguely contends that she was denied due process because the school board failed to hold a hearing concerning the reasons for her demotion. See Board of Regents v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Nabors

196 F.2d 272 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 29, 1952

B. v. Riverside Mfg. Co., 5 Cir., 119 F.2d 302 ; N. L. R. B. v. Continental Pipe Line Co., 5 Cir., 161 F.2d 302 ; N. L. R. B. v. Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills, 5 Cir., 175 F.2d 675 ; N. L. R. B. v. … Board acted.

Jay T. Brown v. Deputy Constable John Glossip

920 F.2d 322 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 10, 1991

We need note only that under Shillingford v. Holmes, 634 F.2d 263 (5th Cir.1981), Brown’s allegations are sufficient to controvert Glossip’s qualified immunity defense. … As a postscript, we add that our earlier opinion, Brown v. Glossip, 878 F.2d 871 (5th Cir.1989), should be interpreted as applying, consistent with Anderson v.

Swartz v. Tx Board of Pardons

119 F.3d 2 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 12, 1997

119 F.3d 2 Swartz v. TX Board of Pardons * NO. 96-11047 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 12, 1997 Appeal From: N.D.Tex. ,No.3:94CV2793G 1 Dismissed. * Fed.R.App.P.34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2

Brown v. Bryan County, OK

235 F.3d 944 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 8, 2000

We have issued two previous opinions, see Brown v. … Bryan County, 67 F.3d 1174 (5th Cir. 1995) (hereinafter “Brown II”) (3) Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 117 S.

Armstrong v. Board of Education of Birmingham

323 F.2d 333 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 12, 1963

Id., 180-183 , 81 S.Ct. 480 -482. •*****•» “ * * * The right alleged is as plainly federal in origin and nature as those vindicated in Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 . … The burden of initiating desegregation does not rest on Negro children or parents or on whites, but on the School Board. As said in Brown v.

Fields v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 3, 2022

That conclusion runs counter to this court’s later holding in Glenn v. … Fields v. Brown, No. 21-90021, ECF 21, (5th Cir. June 21, 2021). 3 Between the managers’ dismissal and Tyson’s dismissal, the Texas Legislature enacted the PLPA.

Lasseter v. U.S. Rr Retirement Board

180 F.3d 263 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 22, 1999

180 F.3d 263 Lasseter v. U.S. RR Retirement Board * NO. 98-60422 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 22, 1999 Appeal From: D.Miss. , No.98-CV-589 1 Affirmed. * Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34-2

Moses v. Washington Parish School Board

421 F.2d 685 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 28, 1970

See Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, supra; Singleton v. Jackson Municipal Separate School System (and consolidated cases en banc), 419 F.2d 1211 [December 1, 1969]. … Under the stringent requirements of Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, 1969, 396 U.S. 19 , 90 S.Ct. 29 , 24 L.Ed.2d 19 , which this Court has carried out in United States v.

Lee v. Lee County Board of Education

639 F.2d 1243 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 19, 1981

Columbus Board of Education v. Penick, 443 U.S. 449 , 99 S.Ct. 2941, 2950 , 61 L.Ed.2d 666 (1979). . … See e. g., Stout v. Jefferson County Board of Education, supra.

W. A. Lloyd v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

301 F.2d 32 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 10, 1962

United States v. Brown Brothers Dryer, Inc. D

930 F.2d 916 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 1, 1991

930 F.2d 916 U.S. v. Brown Brothers Dryer, Inc. * d NO. 90-4584 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. APR 01, 1991 1 Appeal From: E.D.Tex. 2 AFFIRMED. * Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2 d Local Rule 47.6 case

Anderson v. Jefferson County Personnel Board

642 F.2d 1212 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 20, 1981

642 F.2d 1212 * Anderson v. Jefferson County Personnel Board 80-7923 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 3/20/81 1 N.D.Ala. 2 AFFIRMED ***

Bates v. U. S. Parole Board

536 F.2d 388 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 16, 1976

536 F.2d 388 Bates v. U. S. Parole Board No. 76-1391 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 7/16/76 1 N.D.Ga. 2 AFFIRMED *** *** Opinion contains citation(s) or special notations

Cole v. Union Parish School Board

503 F.2d 567 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 16, 1974

503 F.2d 567 Cole v. Union Parish School Board 74-1824 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 10/16/74 W.D.La., 498 F.2d 910

National Labor Relations Board v. Rolligon Corporation

702 F.2d 589 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 11, 1983

Contract Knitter, Inc. v. NLRB, 545 F.2d 967, 971 (5th Cir.1977); NLRB v. … Similarly, in NLRB v.

Carter v. New Orleans Aviation Board

493 F.2d 460 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 3, 1974

Brown v. Uselton

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 8, 2022

Cayce Clerk Tamara Brown, M. … Cory Uselton, Superintendent; DeSoto County Schools; DeSoto County School Board; Shane Jones, Principal; Annie Martin, Guidance Counselor; Natasha Williams, Guidance Counselor; Robert Wilkie, English Teacher Southaven

Vertrees Moses v. Washington Parish School Board

456 F.2d 1285 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 10, 1972

See Lemon v. Bossier Parish School Board, 5th Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 1400 . There is substantial evidence to support the district court’s judgment.