Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.94s
275 F. 612 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 12, 1921
Reynolds v. Tifton Guano Co., 20 Ga. App. 49 , 92 S. E. 389 , and cases there cited. … Stewart v. Jaques, 77 Ga. 365 , 3 S. E. 283 , 4 Am. St. Rep. 86 . The petition to superintend and revise is denied.
Cited 2 timesPublished489 F.2d 1040 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 22, 1974
Cited 2 timesPublished574 F.2d 264 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 2, 1978
Will v. … Board of Education, 174 F.2d 642 (7th Cir. 1949). But compare Hattersley v. Bollt, 512 F.2d 209 (3d Cir. 1975) and Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Co. v. Forman, 469 F.2d 259 (5th Cir. 1972) with Gonzalez v.
Cited 2 timesPublished553 F.3d 768 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 18, 2008
Both Combs and Brown filled her prescriptions. Eventually, she testified, because Brown was uncomfortable with her filling prescriptions at Mason Road every day, she decreased the frequency of her visits. … See State v.
Cited 114 timesPublished650 F.3d 581 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 12, 2011
See United States v. Brown (Brown I), 459 F.3d 509, 513 (5th Cir. 2006). … (quoting Spence v.
Cited 68 timesPublishedUnited States v. Daniel Alfaro
935 F.2d 64 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 23, 1991
United States v. Baldwin, 644 F.2d 381, 385 (5th Cir.1981). … See United States v. Dancy, 861 F.2d 77, 82 (5th Cir.1988).
Cited 31 timesPublished55 F.2d 1076 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 22, 1932
The Board of Tax Appeals held the petitioner liable' for an income tax upon the amounts of compensation he received from the city of Atlanta as supervising architect for a number of public school buildings. … The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the Board, reported in 19 B. T. A. 568, and need not be repeated here. We think the case is controlled by the decision of the Supreme Court in Metcalf & Eddy v.
Cited 3 timesPublished247 F. 948 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 11, 1918
Brown (who will be called the defendant). … Brashier v. Gratz, 6 Wheat. 528 , 5 L. Ed. 322 ; Marble Co. v. Ripley, 10 Wall. 339, 359 , 19 L. Ed. 955 ; Holgate v. Eaton, 116 U. S. *950 33 , 6 Sup. Ct. 224, 29 L. Ed. 538 ; Slaughter v.
Cited 3 timesPublished559 F.2d 28 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 23, 1977
559 F.2d 28 Wells v. Brown * ** No. 76-4474 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 8/23/77 1 S.D.Tex. AFFIRMED * Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. … Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409 ** Local Rule 21 case; see NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966
Cited 1 timesPublishedSouthern Pacific Company v. Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc.
409 F.2d 1331 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 15, 1969
As pointed out in Detroit Traffic Assoc. v. Lakeshore & Michigan Southern Ry. … Railway Company v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedO. C. Brown and Lewis Brown v. United States
401 F.2d 769 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 8, 1968
PER CURIAM: On this appeal, the appellants seek to bring themselves within the rule of Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39 , 88 S.Ct. 697 , 19 L.Ed.2d 889 , and Grosso v. … Brown and find no merit in it. The judgment was affirmed.
Cited 15 timesPublished20 F.3d 1171 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 8, 1994
20 F.3d 1171 Brown v. Lynaugh NO. 93-04070 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Apr 08, 1994 1 Appeal From: E.D.Tex. 2 REVERSED.
Cited 1 timesPublished305 F.3d 304 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 5, 2002
See United States v. Brown, No. 01-10116 (5th Cir. June 6, 2001) (denying motion to expand the district court’s COA grant)(unpublished). 2 Teague v. … United States v. Doggett, 230 F.3d 160, 164-65 (5th Cir. 2000); see also Burton v. United States, 237 F.3d 490 (5th Cir. 2000).5 Brown argues that our decisions in United States v.
Cited 113 timesPublished328 F.3d 787 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 21, 2003
Because Brown made no objections concerning his plea, we apply plain error analysis. United States v. Vonn, 535 U.S. 55, 58 (2002). … Brown’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim, however, is not properly before this Court on direct appeal. See, e.g., United States v. Sevick, 234 F.3d 248, 251 (5th Cir. 2000); United States v.
Cited 71 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 16, 2012
Coffel v. Stryker Corp., 284 F.3d 625, 631 (5th Cir. 2002) (quotation marks and citation omitted). After a jury trial, our standard of review is “especially deferential.” Brown v. … Chortek v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedExela Enterprise Solutions v. NLRB
32 F.4th 436 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 22, 2022
Edith Brown Clement: Exela Enterprise Solutions, Inc. … In Parsons v.
Cited 14 timesPublished589 F.2d 1113 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 1, 1979
589 F.2d 1113 19 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 887 Brown v. … .; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409 ** Local Rule 21 case; see NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966
Cited 2 timesPublished864 F.2d 336 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 28, 1988
CCH 14491A Theresa BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee. No. 88-4294 Summary Calendar. … Mays v.
Cited 1 timesPublished69 F.2d 863 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 22, 1934
In Houston Oil Co. v. Hamilton, 109 Tex. 270 , 206 S. … The petition to revise the conclusion of the Board of Tax Appeals is therefore denied. On Motion for Rehearing. Our opinion in this ease is not in conflict with those in Peavy-Wilson Lumber Co. v. Commissioner (C. C.
Cited 2 timesPublished58 F.3d 636 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 1, 1995
58 F.3d 636 Fitzgerald v. Brown * NO. 94-41107 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 01, 1995 Appeal From: W.D.La., No. 93-CV-2174 1 REVERSED. * Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna