Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
6.00s
Bethlehem Mines Corp. v. Massey
736 F.2d 120 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 5, 1984
Bethlehem’s position finds support in several recent decisions of the Benefits Review Board, see, e.g., Jones v. The New River Co., 3 BLR 1-199 (1981); Ovies v. … This court, however, is not bound to give special deference to the Board’s rulings on issues of law. Carozza v. United States Steel Corp., 727 F.2d 74, 77 (3d Cir.1984).
Cited 83 timesPublishedWilliam S. Berman, M.D. v. Physical Medicine Associates, Limited
225 F.3d 429 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 23, 2000
Compare Byelick v. Vivadelli, 79 F. Supp. 2d 610, 624-25 (E.D. … Code Ann. § 13.1-727.1 ("With respect to any action or any failure to act by the board of directors, the provisions of § 13.1-690 shall apply"); see also United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEileen Chollet v. Scott Brabrand
137 F.4th 241 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 19, 2025
J.A. 228; see 6 USCA4 Appeal: 24-1059 Doc: 44 Filed: 05/19/2025 Pg: 7 of 11 Board of Regents of State Colleges v. … The Virginia General Assembly, Board of Education, and local school boards retain significant authority to establish, maintain, and alter Virginia’s education system at their discretion. Va.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMoore v. Hampton Roads Sanitation District Commission
557 F.2d 1030 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 7, 1976
Board of Commissioners, 333 F.Supp. 353 (E.D.La. 1971); Kelley Island Lime & Transport Co. v. City of Cleveland, 47 F.Supp. 533 (N.D. Ohio 1942); 1 Benedict on Admiralty, 7th Ed. (1974), § 112, at 7-37 et seq. Cf. J. … Although the precise standards set for the Warwick River by the State Water Control Board are not in the record, the Board is required to adopt standards consistent with the general policy of that statute, which protects
Cited 8 timesPublished900 F.2d 736 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 9, 1990
The court also found, under Nash City Board of Education v. Biltmore Co., 640 F.2d 484 (4th Cir.1981), identity of the claims in the two actions. This appeal followed. … See Hostetter v. United States, 739 F.2d 983, 985 (4th Cir.1984).
Cited 211 timesPublishedCox v. Northern Virginia Transportation Commission
551 F.2d 555 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 4, 1976
See Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 , 43 S.Ct. 625, 626 , 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923). . See Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341 , 96 S.Ct. 2074 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976); Arnett v. … Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 156-58 , 94 S.Ct. 1633 , 40 L.Ed.2d 15 (1974); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 572-75 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed. 548 (1972). . See Board of Regents v.
Cited 12 timesPublished22 F.2d 134 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 18, 1927
Singleton v. U. S. (C. C. … Kanellos v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 282 F. 461 ; Thomas v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 290 F. 133 ; Malacrauis v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 299 F. 253 ; U. S. v. Brown (D. C.) 8 F.(2d) 631 , affirmed (C. C. A.) 12 F.(2d) 926 .
Cited 6 timesPublished328 F. App'x 271 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 29, 2009
PER CURIAM: Aram Yacoub, a native and citizen of Egypt, petitions for review from an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. … We have reviewed the administrative record and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 , 112 S.Ct. 719 , 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992).
Cited 0 timesPublished242 F.2d 359 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 28, 1957
Knight v. Mellon, 71 F.2d 1021 . … Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 258 U.S. 549, 568 , 42 S.Ct. 386 , 66 L.Ed. 762 ; U[nited] S[tates] Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corporation v.
Cited 13 timesPublished286 F. App'x 16 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 4, 2008
Jimenez v. Astrue, No. l:06-cv-03228-JFM, 2007 WL 4287580 (D.Md, Nov. 20, 2007).
Cited 0 timesPublished77 F.3d 469 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 14, 1996
MARSH, Plaintiff--Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; Jesse Brown, Secretary, Defendants--Appellees. Elsworth M. MARSH, Plaintiff--Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant--Appellee. … Marsh v. Department of Veterans Affairs, No. CA-95-2-3 (N.D.W.Va. May 25, 1995). In No. 95-2482, we deny in forma pauperis status and dismiss the appeal of the reasoning of the district court. Marsh v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished328 F. App'x 271 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 29, 2009
PER CURIAM: Aram Yacoub, a native and citizen of Egypt, petitions for review from an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. … We have reviewed the administrative record and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 , 112 S.Ct. 719 , 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMalek Abdullah Malek-Marzban and Badry Malek-Marzban v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
653 F.2d 113 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 29, 1981
On August 25, 1980 the petitioners appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals. … Narenji v. Civiletti, 617 F.2d 745 (D.C.Cir.1979); Alvarez v. District Director, INS, 539 F.2d 1220 (9th Cir. 1976); Noel v. Chapman, 508 F.2d 1023 (2d Cir. 1975); Dunn v. INS, 499 F.2d 856 (9th Cir. 1974).
Cited 26 timesPublished325 F. App'x 178 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 6, 2009
PER CURIAM: Elvis David Lewis, a native and citizen of Grenada, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) declining to exercise its sua sponte authority to grant Lewis’s third motion to reconsider … We do not have jurisdiction to review the Board’s decision not to invoke its sua sponte power to grant relief. See Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400-01 (4th Cir.2009).
Cited 0 timesPublished325 F. App'x 178 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 6, 2009
PER CURIAM: Elvis David Lewis, a native and citizen of Grenada, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) declining to exercise its sua sponte authority to grant Lewis’s third motion to reconsider … We do not have jurisdiction to review the Board’s decision not to invoke its sua sponte power to grant relief. See Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400-01 (4th Cir.2009).
Cited 0 timesPublished974 F.2d 508 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 3, 1992
974 F.2d 508 Charlie BROYLES, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE of WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, United States Department of Labor and Benefits Review Board of the United States Department of Labor, Respondents. … Benefits Review Board (86-1091) and Colley v. Benefits Review Board (86-3153), 824 F.2d 327 (1987), aff'd sub nom. Pittston Coal Group v. Sebben, 488 U.S. 105 , 109 S.Ct. 414 , 102 L.Ed.2d 408 (1988).
Cited 0 timesPublished71 F. App'x 242 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 12, 2003
Misrak Ayalew, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) order denying her motion to reconsider and reconsider en banc. … We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Ayalew’s motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a) (2003); INS v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Randy Kearse, A/K/A Randy Kiz, A/K/A Reginald Turner
23 F.3d 404 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 17, 1994
United STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randy KEARSE, a/k/a Randy Kiz, a/k/a Reginald Turner, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-5613. … Smith described an incident that occurred in an apartment in Greensboro, during his first stay in that city, in which Edgar Brown, one of the conspirators, passed a .357 weapon to Kearse, who put it somewhere on his body.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKatia Gutierrez De Martinez v. Drug Enforcement Administration
111 F.3d 1148 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 24, 1997
See Brown v. Armstrong, 949 F.2d 1007, 1011-12 (8th Cir.1991) (rejecting plaintiff's claim that a jury trial was required on scope-of-employment question). … v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna