Case law

Ralph G. Patton v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

940 F.2d 652 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 13, 1991

PATTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-1092. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted June 17, 1991. Decided Aug. 13, 1991. … Patton v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, CA-91-4-ST-C-MU (W.D.N.C. Apr. 26, 1991).

Fan v. Gonzales

133 F. App'x 884 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 13, 2005

PER CURIAM: Qian Fan, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying Fan’s second, identical motion to reopen. … Therefore, we conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a) (2005); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 , 112 S.Ct. 719 , 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992); Stewart v.

Custer v. Sweeney

89 F.3d 1156 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 22, 1996

McGuire, MAYER, BROWN & PLATT, New York, New York, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: J. Hardin Marion, Lawrence J. Quinn, TYDINGS & ROSENBERG, Baltimore, Maryland; William L. Stauffer, Jr., Kurt C. Rommel, R. … The amended complaint discloses that the trustee subcommit- tees that Sweeney represented made only non-binding recommenda- tions to the pension plan's board of trustees, who ultimately decided to enter into the airplane

Khan v. Holder

331 F. App'x 221 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 14, 2009

PER CURIAM: Muhammad Naeem Khan, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) upholding the immigration judge’s denial of his motion for a continuance and … See Lendo v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 439, 441 (4th Cir.2007) (setting forth standard of review for the denial of a motion for a continuance); Onyeme v.

United States v. Moorman

660 F.2d 106 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 24, 1981

He granted the Coast Guard officer’s request for permission to make a “courtesy boarding” of the Jell II. 1 During the “courtesy boarding,” appellant Moorman introduced himself as the Jell II’s first mate. … We apply the standard set out in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), in reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence upon Rule 29 acquittal motions. United States v.

Jemaneh v. Gonzales

184 F. App'x 299 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 9, 2006

PER CURIAM: Frehiwot Jemaneh, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen. … See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719 , 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Moreover, we find Jemaneh’s contention that the Board violated her right to due process in denying reopening to be without merit.

United States v. Al-Con Development Corporation

271 F.2d 904 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 10, 1959

Both plaintiffs and defendants cite Big Vein Pocahontas Co. v. Browning, 1923, 137 Va. 34 , 120 S.E. 247, 249 , to support their respective positions. … V. Pocahontas Co. v.

US ex rel. Citynet, LLC v. Jimmy Gianato

962 F.3d 154 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 22, 2020

Fowler, PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN BROWN & POE, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellants. Rebecca L. … See Samuel v.

Eleftherios Liadakis v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

339 F.2d 447 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 7, 1964

After intermediate proceedings the Board of Immigration Appeals denied the application by order entered April 18, 1963. … V, 1959-63). The petition to this court, vested with exclusive jurisdiction to review the order, Foti v.

Gallishaw v. Reed

397 F. App'x 852 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 6, 2010

Gallishaw v. Reed, No. 9:09-cv-02566-CMC, 2010 WL 2622929 (D.S.C. June 24, 2010).

Khan v. Holder

331 F. App'x 221 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 14, 2009

PER CURIAM: Muhammad Naeem Khan, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) upholding the immigration judge’s denial of his motion for a continuance and … See Lendo v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 439, 441 (4th Cir.2007) (setting forth standard of review for the denial of a motion for a continuance); Onyeme v.

Clarence Ramey, James Bledsoe, David Curtis Minton, Chester Fugate, Herschel Woodward, Onza Collier, Danny Moore, Ronnie Fortner, James Hensley, Muriel Gibbons, James Hamilton, Marion Hobbs v. Paul T. Harber, Individually and as Sheriff of Lee County, and Board of Supervisors of Lee County, W. Quentin Littrell, Individually and as Member, Roy Lucas, Individually and as Member, Ralph Robinette, Individually and as Member, C. B. Waddell, Individually and as Member, J. K. Newman, Individually and as Member, Bill Jessee, Individually and as Member, W. R. Hines, Individually and as Member, A. T. Burchette, Individually and as Member, Clarence Ramey, James Bledsoe, David Curtis Minton, Chester Fugate, Herschel Woodward, Onza Collier, Danny Moore, Ronnie Fortner, James Hensley, Muriel Gibbons, James Hamilton, Marion Hobbs v. Paul T. Harber, Individually and as Sheriff of Lee County, Board of Supervisors of Lee County, W. Quentin Littrell, Individually and as Member, Roy Lucas, Individually and as Board Member, Ralph Robinette, Individually and as Member, C. B. Waddell, Individually and as Member, J. K. Newman, Individually and as Member, Bill Jessee, Individually and as Member, W. R. Hines, Individually and as Member, A. T. Burchette, Individually and as Member, Clarence Ramey, James Bledsoe, David Curtis Minton, Chester Fugate, Onza Collier, Danny Moore, James Hensley, Muriel Gibbons, James Hamilton v. County of Lee Virginia, Board of Supervisors of Lee County, Virginia, W. Quentin Littrell, Roy Lucas, Ralph Robinette, C. B. Waddell, J. K. Newman, Bill Jessee, Jack Lee, A. T. Burchette, W. R. Hines

589 F.2d 753 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 15, 1978

of Supervisors and members of that Board. … Sindermann, supra, and Keyishian v. Board of Regents, supra, Sheriff Harber should reasonably have suspected that he could not act with impunity.

Murtala v. Ashcroft

90 F. App'x 46 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 19, 2004

Ahmed Gbadansi Murtala, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to re *47 open deportation proceedings. … We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Murtala’s motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a) (2003); INS v.

Clyde S. S. Co. v. Whaley

231 F. 76 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 2, 1916

Flinn & Hart v. Brown, 6 S. C. 229; Equitable Mfg. Co. v. Allen, 76 Vt. 22 , 56 Atl. 87 , 104 Am. St. Rep. 915 ; Langenberger v. Kroeger, 48 Cal. 147 , 17 Am. Rep. 418 ; Burgess v. Blake (Ala.) 86 Am. St. … Rep. 103 , note; White Sewing Machine Co. v. Dakin, 86 Mich. 581 , 49 N. W. 583 , 13 L. R. A. 313; Gleason v. Hamilton, 138 N. Y. 353 , 34 N. E. 203 , 21 L. R. A. 210; Vanderford v. Farmers’ & M. N.

Lockspeiser v. Western Maryland Co.

768 F.2d 558 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 15, 1985

Vaughn v. Teledyne, Inc., 628 F.2d 1214, 1221 (9th Cir.1980), notes that disclosure of financial projec *561 tions is not required. In Kohn v. … See, e.g., Healey v. Catalyst Recovery of Pennsylvania, Inc., 616 F.2d 641, 647 (3d Cir.1980); Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Co., Inc. v.

Roanoke River Basin Association v. Hudson

991 F.2d 132 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 20, 1993

Rep. 20,837 ROANOKE RIVER BASIN ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, and State of North Carolina; Brunswick County, Virginia, Board of Supervisors; Charlotte County, Virginia, Board of Supervisors; Granville County, North Carolina … ; Halifax County, Virginia, Board of Supervisors; Halifax County, North Carolina; Martin County, North Carolina; Mecklenburg County, Virginia, Board of Supervisors; Northampton County, North Carolina; Vance County, North

Myrna E. Friedman v. Supreme Court of Virginia David B. Beach, American Corporate Counsel Association Amicus Curiae

822 F.2d 423 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 21, 1987

A due process challenge to the Virginia Rule was rejected in Brown v. Supreme Court of Virginia, 359 F.Supp. 549 (E.D.Va.), aff'd mem., 414 U.S. 1034 , 94 S.Ct. 533 , 38 L.Ed.2d 327 (1973). … See also In re Titus, 213 Va. 289 , 191 S.E.2d 798 (1972); In re Brown, supra.

Harold Lee Jones v. Superintendent, Virginia State Farm

460 F.2d 150 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 1, 1972

United States v. Glass, 317 F.2d 200, 202 (4th Cir. 1963); accord, United States v. Shoaf, 341 F.2d 832 (4th Cir. 1964). … Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 (1963); United States v. Shoaf, supra.

D/S A/S International v. McCully

65 F.2d 714 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 15, 1933

All on board were saved. There is no evidence that anyone on board the Verona saw the Chaika until she was hit. … A.) 5 F.(2d) 178 ; Reynolds et al. v. Vanderbilt et al., 106 U. S. 17 , 1 S. Ct. 41 , 27 L. Ed. 91 . The decree of the court below will be modified in accordance with this opinion.

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Alan Wilson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 23, 2022

capacity as a Member of the South Carolina Board of Medical Examiners; THERESA MILLS-FLOYD, in her official capacity as a Member of the South Carolina Board of Medical Examiners; JEFFREY A. … Atl. v. Wilson, 527 F. Supp. 3d 801, 808 (D.S.C. 2021) (first citing Singleton v. Wulff, 428 U.S. 106, 117 (1976) (plurality opinion); and then citing Planned Parenthood of Cent. Mo. v.