Case law

United States v. 7,405.3 Acres of Land

97 F.2d 417 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 6, 1938

Pennell v. Brookshire, 193 N.C. 73 , 136 S.E. 257 ; Herbert v. Union Development Co., 170 N.C. 622 , 87 S.E. 515 ; Brown v. Hutchinson, 155 N.C. 205 , 71 S.E. 302 ; Hudson v. Jordan, 108 N.C. 10 , 12 S.E. 1029, 1030 . … It has built schools, including a large boarding school, and provided teachers for the education of their children. It has provided an experienced farmer to go among them and teach them the arts of agriculture.

General Trucking Corp. v. Salyers

175 F.3d 322 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 27, 1999

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. … Recently, however, in Gulf & West- ern Indus. v. Ling, No. 97-2107, 1999 WL 149851 (4th Cir.

Okello v. Holder

553 F. App'x 342 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 5, 2014

PER CURIAM: Nancy Jescker Okello, a native and citizen of Kenya, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing her appeal of the Immigration Judge’s decision denying her motion to … We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a) (2013); Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir.2009) (setting forth standard of review).

J. Ronnie Jackson v. Charles H. Long, Individually, and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Buncombe County, Teresa A. Penland v. Charles H. Long, Individually, and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Buncombe County

102 F.3d 722 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 17, 1996

DiMeglio v. … Duties of Personnel Advisory Board.

Pocahontas Supreme Coal Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

828 F.2d 211 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 1, 1987

Again, the complaint did not purport to identify the directors or boards involved in such a “deputization” scheme. … Weinberger, 498 F.2d at 555 (quoting Moviecolor, Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80, 88 (2d Cir.1961) (quoting Stearns v.

Adaobi Stella Obioha v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

431 F.3d 400 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 8, 2005

Adaobi Stella Obioha (“Obioha”) challenges the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to remand. … It does not affirmatively require the Board to reopen the proceedings under any particular condition.” INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 105 , 108 S.Ct. 904 , 99 L.Ed.2d 90 (1988) (quoting INS v.

Deibert Barge-Bldg. Co. v. United States

289 F. 805 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 1, 1923

In Piedmont & George’s Creek Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co., 254 U. S. 11, 12 , 41 Sup. Ct. 1, 65 L. Ed. 97 , a decision of Mr. … This latter decision has been followed by this court in United States v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 289 Fed. 802 , decided March 23, 1923, and in United States v.

Alan B. Morrison v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., Nissan Motor Corporation in U. S. A., S. & R. Inc., D/B/A Vob Datsun Sales

601 F.2d 139 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 25, 1979

See, United States v. Real Estate Boards (1950) 339 U.S. 485, 489 , 70 S.Ct. 711 , 94 L.Ed. 1007 ; Interstate Circuit v. U. S. (1939) 306 U.S. 208, 226-27 , 59 S.Ct. 467 , 83 L.Ed. 610 ; U. S. v. … Actually they could not have done less in view of Real Estate Boards. United States v. Real Estate Boards, supra, 339 U.S. at 495 , 70 S.Ct. 711 .

Fred Franken v. United States

248 F.2d 789 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 18, 1957

This, we think, was sufficient to meet the requirement of the rule announced in the case of Jencks v. United States, 353 U.S. 657 , 77 S.Ct. 1007 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1103 . … Brown’s testimony as I remember it, when steel was very tight, it was difficult to get that grade of steel. Here’s a company who is in the manufacturing business buying steel for its own manufacturing purposes.

D'AnnA v. United States (Two Cases). Thompson v. United States. Klaus v. United States

181 F.2d 335 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 11, 1950

Requena, 224 U.S. 89, 98-99 , 32 S.Ct. 399 , 50 L.Ed. 680 ; Hoclisehild Kohn & Co. v. Canoles, Md., 66 A.2d 780 ; Potts v. Armour & Co., 183 Md. 483 , 39 A.2d 552 ; Smith v. Blue Ridge Transp. … Co., 172 Md. 42 , 191 A. 66 ; Potomac Edison Co. v. Johnson, 160 Md. 33 , 152 A. 633 ; Heim v. Roberts, 135 Md. 600 , 109 A. 329 ; West Virginia Central & Pittsburgh R. Co. v.

Alean Hester Faust, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Lonnie Faust, Deceased, Tommy Bennett, Curtis L. Muldrow v. South Carolina State Highway Department, and United States of America, Alean Hester Faust, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Lonnie Faust, Deceased, Tommy Bennett, Curtis L. Muldrow v. South Carolina State Highway Department, and United States of America

721 F.2d 934 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 13, 1983

Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 728-37 (1974) (statute burdening right to vote upheld because of compelling state interest). … See, e.g., Brown v. Kentucky, 513 F.2d 333 (6th Cir.1975) (rule 10b-5 claim against Commonwealth of Kentucky held barred by eleventh amendment under Edelman and Employees); cf. Bivens v.

United States v. Marvin Mandel, United States of America v. W. Dale Hess, United States of America v. Harry W. Rodgers, Iii, United States of America v. William A. Rodgers, United States of America v. Irvin Kovens, United States of America v. Ernest N. Cory, Jr., United States of America v. W. Dale Hess, Harry W. Rodgers, Iii, and William A. Rodgers

591 F.2d 1347 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 11, 1979

Brown, 540 F.2d 364, 374-75 (8th Cir. 1976); United States v. … United States v. Browning, 390 F.2d 511, 512 (4th Cir. 1968).

Jufreda J. Walker v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

16 F.3d 414 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 27, 1994

WALKER, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-1494. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 12, 1993. Jan. 27, 1994. … PER CURIAM: 1 Jufreda Walker appeals from a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) finding her deportable and denying relief from deportation.

Lowry v. Bedford Cnty School Bd

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 19, 1999

See Brown v. McLean, 159 F.3d 898, 905 (4th Cir. 1998). … (citing O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp., 517 U.S. 308 (1996), Howard v. Roadway Express, Inc., 726 F.2d 1529, 1535 (11th Cir. 1984), and Jones v. W.

United States v. Jacob Ross

72 F.4th 40 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 30, 2023

In United States v. … See, e.g., Ewing v.

Earnestine Shivers v. Navy Exchange Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

144 F.3d 322 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 18, 1998

Navy Exchange argues primarily that the Board’s" decisions in Cantrell v. Base Restaurant, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, 22 B.R.B.S. 372 (1989), and Harris v. England Air Force Base Nonappropriated Fund Fin. … Of course, because the Benefits Review Board is not a policymaking agency, we owe its interpretation of LHWCA no special deference. See v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth., 36 F.3d 375, 383 (4th Cir.1994).

Amos D. Faux-Burhans v. Board of County Commissioners of Frederick County

859 F.2d 149 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 9, 1988

FAUX-BURHANS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF FREDERICK COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 88-3929. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued July 7, 1988. Decided Sept. 9, 1988.

Eshete v. Holder

464 F. App'x 155 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 7, 2012

PER CURIAM: Tegegnework Tarku Eshete, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider. … We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a) (2011); Narine v.

Penn Advertising v. Mayor and City Council

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 20, 1996

Thomas Byron, III, MAYER, BROWN & PLATT, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Neal M. Janey, City Solicitor, Burton Harry Levin, Principal Counsel, Sandra R. … Thomas Byron, III, MAYER, BROWN & PLATT, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Neal M. Janey, City Solicitor, Burton Harry Levin, Principal Counsel, Sandra R.

Public Employees' Retirement Ass'n v. Deloitte & Touche LLP

551 F.3d 305 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 5, 2009

DELOITTE & TOUCHE 7 the JMR joint venture agreement specified that decisions would be made by a board of directors, "deciding unani- mously," and that the board would consist of three members appointed by Ahold and … In Ernst & Ernst v.