Case law

Myers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

180 F.2d 969 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 28, 1950

See, also, Commissioner v. Fiske’s Estate, 7 Cir., 128 F.2d 487, 490 ; Yaross v. Kraemer, D.C., 83 F.Supp. 411 ; Bouldin v. Commissioner, 8 T.C. 959 . … See Swenson v. Thomas, 5 Cir., 164 F.2d 783, 784-785 ; Yaross v.

United States v. James Gould

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 2, 2026

Class v. … While we haven’t shied away from deciding challenges at Bruen’s first step, e.g., Price, 111 F.4th at 398; Bianchi v. Brown, 111 F.4th 438, 452–53 (4th Cir. 2024) (en banc), cert. denied, 145 S.

Cantley v. West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority

771 F.3d 201 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 14, 2014

Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of Burlington, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1510 , 182 L.Ed.2d 566 (2012), and to take steps to ensure that their policies conform to that decision. … Because the Supreme Court issued Florence v.

City of Alexandria v. Helms

728 F.2d 643 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 28, 1984

City of Irving v. … See Pickus v. United States Board of Parole, 165 U.S.App.D.C. 284, 289 , 507 F.2d 1107, 1112 (1974); Lewis-Mota v. Secretary of Labor, 469 F.2d 478, 481 (2d Cir.1972); Texaco, Inc. v.

Meadows v. Charles County School Board of Education

696 F. App'x 105 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 21, 2017

MEADOWS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLES COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION; KELLER III BUS SERVICE INCORPORATED, Keller Jr. Owner/President of School Board; HELEN E. … P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545- 46 (1949). The order Meadows seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

Wayne L. Davis v. National Labor Relations Board

923 F.2d 848 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 28, 1991

DAVIS, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 90-1539. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 7, 1991. Decided Jan. 22, 1991. … See NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 138-39 (1975). As such, we are without jurisdiction to entertain the petition. 2 As the dispositive issue has been authoritatively decided, we dispense with oral argument.

Wight v. Heublein

238 F. 321 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 9, 1916

Heublein v. Wight, 227 Fed. 667 . … The underlying principle is well stated, citing a number of cases, in Wickersham v.

Olgens Dragenice v. Tom Ridge, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security

389 F.3d 92 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 5, 2004

He argues, relying on INS v. St. … See Ramtulla v.

Gas Spring Company v. National Labor Relations Board

908 F.2d 966 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 16, 1990

Co. v. NLRB, 658 F.2d 968 , 977 (4th Cir.1981). Any inferences that the Board has drawn from the facts need only be reasonable. … NLRB v.

Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. Packer

60 F.3d 1116 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 31, 1995

In NCNB National Bank of North Carolina v. … In Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark v.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Scott M. Waldron

630 F.2d 239 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 26, 1980

Evatt v. Campbell, 234 S.C. 1 , 106 S.E.2d 447 (1959); American Oil Co. v. Cox, 182 S.C. 419 , 189 S.E. 660 (1937). … Huffines, Jr., Foundation, Inc. v. Rockie Realty, Inc., 347 F.Supp. 1256 (D.S.C.1972); Neal v. Clark, 196 S.C. 139 , 12 S.E.2d 921 (1941).

Mary G. P. Hall and Lawrence C. Roush v. Thomas W. Bradshaw, Jr., Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Transportation

630 F.2d 1018 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 10, 1980

Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947); McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420 , 81 S.Ct. 1101 , 6 L.Ed.2d 393 (1961); Engel v. … See McCollum v. Board of Education, 333 U.S. 203, 212 , 68 S.Ct. 461, 465 , 92 L.Ed. 649 (1948). B.

Beard v. Tuell

164 F. App'x 438 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 3, 2006

See Beard v. Tuell, No. CA-04-764-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 17, 2005).

Suarez Corporation Industries v. Darrell V. Mcgraw, Jr.

202 F.3d 676 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 2, 2000

See, e.g., Board of County Comm'rs v. … See Manchin v. Browning, 296 S.E.2d 909, 915 (W.

Donald R. English, William R. Williams, and the A. B. C. Employees Association of New Hanover County v. W. Douglas Powell, Individually and as Administrator to the New Hanover County Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Charles S. Carter, Individually and as Assistant to the Administrator, the New Hanover County Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, John E. Mowbray, Pender P. Durham, Eugene W. Edwards, Individually and as Members of the New Hanover County Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, E. A. Shands & Vera Shands v. W. Douglas Powell, Individually and as Administrator to the New Hanover County Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, the New Hanover Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, and Its Individual Members: John E. Mowbray, Pender P. Durham and W. Eugene Edwards, William L. Clark, Robert Kraus, Ledley B. Symmes, C. C. Williams, Telford Davis, Bedford Jackson and William T. Small, and James J. Wall, Abc Employees Association, Donald R. English, William R. Williams, E. A. Shands and Wife, Vera Shands, Counterclaim v. W. Douglas Powell, Individually and as Administrator of the New Hanover County Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Charles S. Carter, Individually and as Assistant to the Administrator of New Hanover County Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, the New Hanover County Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, John E. Mowbray, William Rehder, W. Eugene Edwards, Individually and as Members of the New Hanover County Alcoholic Beverage Control Board and Pender Durham

592 F.2d 727 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 31, 1979

Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … Here, Shands' complaints to members of the Board are more like those characterized in Chitwood v.

Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Lamphier

714 F.2d 331 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 4, 1983

V. … Just as we recently held in Thomason v.

Norfolk Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Corp. v. Parker

154 F.2d 560 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 8, 1946

London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Hoage, 64 App.D.C. 105 , 75 F.2d 236 ; State Engineering Co. v. Harris, 157 Md. 487 , 146 A. 392 ; Pushor v. American Ry. Exp. Co., 149 Minn. 308 , 183 N.W. 839 . … Harris v. Hoage, 62 App.D.C. 275 , 66 F.2d 801 ; Texas Employers’ Ins. Ass’n v. Sheppeard, 5 Cir., 62 F.2d 122 ; Pocahontas Fuel Co., Inc. v. Monahan, 1 Cir., 41 F.2d 48 . Affirmed.

Chesapeake Plywood, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

917 F.2d 22 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 26, 1990

.' " NLRB v. … News, Inc. v.

Weller v. Department Of Social Services For The City Of Baltimore

901 F.2d 387 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 24, 1990

Brown 6 On appeal, counsel for Weller asserts that BCDSS and JSA "violated Mr. … Brown was named individually and in his capacity as City Solicitor for the City of Baltimore Law Department. Mr.

Guilavogui v. Mukasey

284 F. App'x 33 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 21, 2008

We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See Barry v. … Further, we lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s refusal to invoke its sua sponte authority to reopen proceedings. See Zhao Quan Chen v. Gonzales, 492 F.3d 153, 155 (2d Cir.2007).