Case law

Tazco, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Program

895 F.2d 949 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 8, 1990

On August 25, 1987, the Benefits Review Board affirmed the decision of the ALJ. The Board denied Old Republic’s request for reconsideration on January 3, 1989. This appeal followed. II. … The Benefits Review Board was unmoved by the fact that in the similar case of Warner Coal Co. v.

Kennedy v. Allera

612 F.3d 261 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 15, 2010

However, the National Appeals Board has deter- mined that, under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), you are required to reg- ister as a sex offender. See U.S. v. Gould, 526 F. … As noted in the document, this was based on a decision by the National Appeals Board.

Martin v. Commonwealth of Virginia

349 F.2d 781 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 5, 1965

Indeed, in Jones v. … the board were not deprived of discretion by reason of the convictions based upon them.

Ervin R. Looney v. Woodman Three Mines, Incorporated Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

57 F.3d 1066 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 9, 1995

We have held that, even where a petition for review is mistakenly sent to the Board within the sixty-day period, but filed in this Court outside of that period, we lack jurisdiction to consider the appeal. See Adkins v. … Under such circumstances, we have held that the Board's order denying reconsideration triggers the running of a new sixty-day period for appeal. See Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v.

Harman Mining Company v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor and Jack Stewart

826 F.2d 1388 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 1, 1987

Mourning v. Family Publication Services, Inc., 411 U.S. 356, 369 , 93 S.Ct. 1652, 1660 , 36 L.Ed.2d 318 (1973). … See Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16 , 85 S.Ct. 792, 801 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965).

Helvering v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins.

72 F.2d 363 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 28, 1934

The Board of Tax Appeals answered this question in the affirmative, on the ground that this section of the statute was unconstitutional; but, in view of tho recent decision of the Supreme Court in Helvering v. … Ed. 1311 , the decision of the Board must be reversed. Reversed.

Custom Ship Interiors v. Roberts

300 F.3d 510 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 15, 2002

IV. 20 For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the Benefits Review Board. 21 AFFIRMED. Notes: * Custom Ship's reliance on McNutt v. … Zachry Co. v. Quinones, Director OWCP, 206 F.3d 474, 479 (5th Cir.2000); McNutt v.

Zeb Gaston v. John B. Taylor, Warden, Samuel Pruett, Assistant Warden, Toni v. Bair, Regional Administrator

946 F.2d 340 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 8, 1991

A liberty interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment must amount to more than an abstract need or desire, Board of Regents of State Colleges v. … The Board’s inquiry is a “prediction of the prisoner’s prospects for a law-abiding life,” and “[t]he factors, both objective and otherwise, that may inform this prediction are numerous.” Bloodgood v.

Allen v. United States

194 F. 664 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 27, 1912

Justice, Brown who decided United States v. Butler, supra, pointed out that it was impossible to hold that the defendant was being tried twice for the same crime. … Justice Brown give to any, of his judicial deliverances, his reasoning in this case has failed to secure general acceptance.

American Chain & Cable Co., Inc. v. Rochester Ropes, Inc

199 F.2d 325 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 13, 1952

Brown Morton, Jr., New York City, on brief), for appellant and cross-appellee. Robert W. Byerly, New York City, and Thomas B. Gay, Richmond, Va., (John H. … Industrial Chemical Co. v. Theroz Co., 4 Cir., 25 F.2d 387 ; Baker-Cammack Hosiery Mills v. Davis Co., 4 Cir., 181 F.2d 550 . In Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v.

United States v. Paul Boccone

556 F. App'x 215 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 20, 2014

Finally, Brown argues that he acted in good faith because supervising doctors and the Virginia Board of Medicine never 35 stated his treatment of any patient was improper. … While Brown contends that supervising physicians and the Board never criticized his treatment of any patient, Brown also points to no evidence that they approved specific prescriptions underlying

Lewis J. Knighton v. The Laurens County School District No. 56 and Charles L. Cummins, Jr.

721 F.2d 976 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 14, 1983

Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, 413 U.S. 189, 208-10 , 93 S.Ct. 2686, 2697-98 , 37 L.Ed.2d 548 (1973); Chambers v. … Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 , 101 S.Ct. 1089 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981). 2 .

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ford Motor Co.

645 F.2d 183 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 19, 1981

Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney, 439 U.S. 24 , 99 S.Ct. 295 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978) (per curiam); McDonnell Douglas. … The Board estimates the back pay the discrimination victim would have earned but for the discrimination and subtracts actual earnings to determine the back pay award. NLRB v.

Eplion v. Director, Office Of Workers' Compensation Programs

794 F.2d 935 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 25, 1986

The Board must affirm the findings of fact of the ALJ if they are supported by substantial evidence. 33 U.S.C. Sec. 921 (b)(3); Zbosnik v. Badger Coal Co., 759 F.2d 1187 (4th Cir.1985). … Eplion's reliance on Roberts v. Weinberger, 527 F.2d 600 (4th Cir.1975), is misplaced.

Csx Transportation, Incorporated v. United Transportation Union

29 F.3d 931 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 21, 1994

Inc. v. … (Huron) v.

Froelich v. Senior Campus Living Llc

355 F.3d 802 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 22, 2004

Burke v. Fid. … See Homer v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., 155 Md. 66 , 141 A. 425, 432 (1928); accord Lerner v. Lerner, 306 Md. 771 , 511 A.2d 501, 506 (1986); see also Walk v.

Marine v. Packham

52 F. 579 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 11, 1892

The supreme court of the United States, in Thornley v. U. S., 113 U. S. 310, 313 , 5 Slip. Ct. … S. v. Wiltberger, 5 Wheat. 95 ; Cherokee Tobacco, 11 Wall. 621 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of Fayetteville, Inc.

24 F. App'x 104 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 12, 2001

OPINION ON REHEARING UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,  Petitioner, v. … Robert James Englehart, Supervisory Attorney, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Board. ON BRIEF: Scott M. Wich, CLIFTON, BUDD & DEMARIA, L.L.P., New York, New York, for 2 NLRB v.

In re Williams

139 F.2d 262 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 22, 1943

The case must therefore be decided upon the testimony of the seaman who was the only witness heard by the board of inspectors and by the judge. … The Baltic, 5 Cir., 256 F. 95 ; The Tairoa, 2 Cir., 297 F. 449 ; The Nigretia, 2 Cir., 255 F. 56 ; The Italier, 2 Cir., 257 F. 712 ; United States v. Smith, 5 Cir., 12 F.2d 265 .

Smith v. Virginia

353 F. App'x 790 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 1, 2009

Smith v. Virginia, No. 3:08-cv-00800-REP, 2009 WL 2175759 (E.D.Va. July 16, 2009).