Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.61s
Monarch Refrigerating Co. v. Farmers' Peanut Co.
74 F.2d 790 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 8, 1935
Egley v. T. B. Bennett & Co., 196 Ind. 50 , 145 N. E. 830 , 40 A. L. R. 436 and note; Carroll v. Gore, 106 Fla. 582 , 143 So. 633 , 89 A. L. R. 1495 and note; Bonnett-Brown Corporation v. Coble, 195 N. C. 491 , 142 S. … Bonnett-Brown Corporation v. Coble, supra; Cuykendall v. Doe, 129 Iowa, 453 , 105 N. W. 698 , 3 L. R. A. (N. S.) 449, 113 Am. St. Rep. 472 ; Ritter v. Hoffman, 35 Kan. 215 , 10 P. 576 ; Snyder v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBanca del Sempione v. Provident Bank
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 17, 1998
Restatement (Second) of Agency § 1(1) (1958); accord Patten v. Board of Liquor License Comm'r, 107 Md. App. 224, 238, 667 A.2d 940, 947 (1995). Suriel was a borrower and BDS a lender. … Cromwell v. Commerce & Energy Bank, 464 So. 2d 721, 732, 736 (La. 1985); Brown v. United States Nat'l Bank, 371 N.W.2d 692, 700 (Neb. 1985); article 3 UCP.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOrville W. Walker v. Monsanto Chemical Company, a Corporation
354 F.2d 240 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 16, 1965
WALKER, Appellant, v. MONSANTO CHEMICAL COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee. No. 10077. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Argued December 9, 1965. Decided December 16, 1965. … Markus, Cleveland, Ohio (Sindell, Sindell, Bourne, Markus, Stern & Spero, Cleveland, Ohio, and Kaufman & Browning, Charleston, W. Va., on brief), for appellant. Robert L. Elkins, Charleston, W. Va., (W. T.
Cited 0 timesPublished898 F.2d 145 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 6, 1990
Gonzalez v. United States Parole Commission, C/A 88-1473 (S.D.W.Va. Oct. 10, 1989). … Sec. 2.26(a) may be accepted for good cause in the discretion of the National Appeals Board. Accordingly, the motion is denied
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States v. Michael H. Cohen
617 F.2d 56 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 11, 1980
In rebuttal the government offered the testimony of an investigator from the Thoroughbred Racing Protective Board, who testified, based on business records of the Board, that Cohen had been ejected from several racetracks … See United States v. Perez, 565 F.2d 1227, 1233-34 (2d Cir. 1977). Defendant urges that evidence of other winning tickets cashed by him and the testimony by the Board investigator were erroneously admitted.
Cited 22 timesPublishedUnited States v. Howard Tate, A/K/A Howard Brown
972 F.2d 344 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 28, 1992
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Howard TATE, a/k/a Howard Brown, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-5785. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. … United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSher J. Rana v. United States of America, and Casper W. Weinberger, Secretary, Department of Defense
812 F.2d 887 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 3, 1987
See Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 546 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1495 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985). The “meaningfulness” of his chance to respond is a matter for the finder of fact. … Cf Chandler v.
Cited 34 timesPublishedCarnell Construction Corp. v. Danville Redevelopment & Housing Authority
745 F.3d 703 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 6, 2014
See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992); Miller v. Brown, 462 F.3d 312, 316 (4th Cir. 2006). … Co. v. Brown, 307 F.2d 306, 308 42 (5th Cir. 1962).
Cited 46 timesPublished201 F. App'x 959 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 4, 2006
INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992); Barry v. Gonzales, 445 F.3d 741, 744 (4th Cir. 2006). … M.A. v. INS, 899 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir. 1990) (en banc). This court reverses the Board’s denial of such a motion only if the denial is “arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.”
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 23, 2023
Portillo-Flores v. … See Moskos v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPigeon River Ry. Co. v. Champion Fibre Co.
280 F. 557 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 21, 1922
Ed. 917 ; Leavenworth v. Chicago, etc., Ry. Co., 134 U. S. 688, 705-708 , 10 Sup. Ct. 708, 33 L. Ed. 1064 ; Fitzgerald Const. Co. v. Fitzgerald, 137 U. S. 99 , 109, 110, 11 Sup. Ct. 36, 34 L. Ed. 608 ; Sanford Co. v. … Ed. 713 ; Indianapolis Rolling Mill v. St. Louis Rrd., 120 U. S. 256 , 7 Sup. Ct. 542, 30 L.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCharita D. Chalmers v. Tulon Company of Richmond
101 F.3d 1012 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 4, 1996
Tu-lon’s business involves the manufacturing of drill bits and routers used in the printed circuit board industry. J.A. 42. … Brown v. Polk County, 61 F.3d 650, 654 (8th Cir.1995) (en banc) (quoting Heller v. EBB Auto Co., 8 F.3d 1433, 1439 (9th Cir.1993)).
Cited 145 timesPublishedUnited States v. James Franklin Lewis
392 F.2d 440 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 4, 1968
Unfortunately for Lewis, in Hill v. … As we said in United States v.
Cited 37 timesPublishedManuel Toledo v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
59 F.3d 167 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 22, 1995
II 4 The Board's determination that Manuel Toledo failed to establish extreme hardship under Sec. 1182(h)(1)(B) is reviewed for abuse of discretion. Hassan v. INS, 927 F.2d 465, 467 (9th Cir.1991); Osuchukwu v. … IV 11 Manuel Toledo argues that the Board erred in denying his motion to reopen his deportation proceeding. We review the Board's refusal to reopen a deportation proceeding for abuse of discretion. INS v.
Cited 0 timesPublished424 F.2d 195 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 18, 1970
We consolidated these appeals for hearing and disposition in light of Alexander v. Holmes County Bd. of Educ., 396 U.S. 19 , 90 S.Ct. 29 , 24 L.Ed.2d 19 (Oct. 29, 1969), and Nesbit v. … County School Board of New Kent County, 391 U.S. 430 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 ; Alexander v. Holmes County Bd. of Educ., 396 U.S. 79 , 90 S.Ct. 29 , 24 L.Ed.2d 19 (Oct. 29, 1969); Carter v.
Cited 17 timesPublished45 F.3d 427 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 10, 1995
Rickie STILTNER, Petitioner, v. UNITED COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents. No. 93-1987. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. … On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (91-1253-BLA) Rickie Stiltner, Petitioner Pro Se.
Cited 0 timesPublished23 F.3d 855 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 6, 1994
See Henglein v. … V.
Cited 124 timesPublishedUnited States v. Bobby Gene Perdue
425 F.2d 1092 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 11, 1970
Because of the local board’s failure to disclose the basis for its action, defendant’s conviction for failure to report pursuant to the classification of I-A cannot stand. United States v. … Broyles, 423 F.2d 1299 (4 Cir. 1970); United States v. James, 417 F.2d 826 (4 Cir. 1969).
Cited 2 timesPublishedWanda Johnson v. Baltimore City, Maryland: Baltimore Police Dept.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 6, 2026
Misjuns v. … Semple v.
Cited 0 timesPublished51 F.3d 417 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 6, 1995
Brown; Ora J. Brown; Douglas A. Brown; Anne R. Brown; Lloyd K. Brown; Sherry L. Brown; Otis F. Bryan, Jr.; William C. Bryson; Phyllis W. Bryson; Howard L. Bubel; Renate Bubel; John M. Buckley, Jr.; Joan L. … Guste v.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna