Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca4

10,000+ results

4.43s

  • John E. Holliman v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company

    852 F.2d 759 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 26, 1988

    Holliman petitions for review of a decision of the Benefits Review Board (Board) which reversed an administrative law judge’s (AU) award of reinstatement with back pay under section 49 of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ … Geddes v. BRB, 735 F.2d 1412, 1415 (D.C.Cir.1984). . First, an employer must commit a discriminatory act, id., “the essence of [which] lies in the different treatment of like groups or individuals.” Dickens v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • William Christopher Brown v. Howard E. Friedman, Clerk, Maryland Court of Special Appeals, Defendant

    846 F.2d 69 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 11, 1988

    William Christopher BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Howard E. FRIEDMAN, Clerk, Maryland Court of Special Appeals, Defendant- Appellee. No. 88-6506. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 29, 1988. … Brown v. Friedman, C/A No. 87-2282-H (D.Md. Dec. 17, 1987). 2 AFFIRMED.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • David Kenneth Yost, Sr. v. John Brown, Warden and Manager of M.C.I.H. And W.P.D.C.

    836 F.2d 548 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 30, 1987

    David Kenneth YOST, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John BROWN, Warden and Manager of M.C.I.H. and W.P.D.C., Defendants-Appellees. No. 87-7583. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 30, 1987. … Yost v. Brown, C/A Nos. 86-2590-JFM, 86-3730-JFM (D.Md. Mar. 16, 1987). 2 AFFIRMED.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. Beckett

    163 F. 479 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 27, 1908

    In the case of Riley v. W. Va. Cent. & P. R. Co., 27 W. … Co. v. McDade, supra.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Curtis Bay Towing Co. Of Virginia, Inc. v. Southern Lighterage Corp. The J. Alvah Clark. The Covered Wagon

    200 F.2d 33 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 10, 1952

    The owner of the tug is not an insurer against whom the mere loss of the tow raises a presumption of fault, Stevens v. … The Perth Am-boy No. 4, 2 Cir., 135 F.2d 404 ; Henry DuBois Sons v. Penn R. R., 2 Cir., 47 F.2d 172 . Accordingly, the decree of the District Court is affirmed. Affirmed.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • United States v. Joseph Wayne Pratt

    351 F.3d 131 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 5, 2003

    See Brown, 832 F.2d at 130 (holding declaration of agent “fails to convince us beyond a reasonable doubt that no prejudicial contact occurred”); United States v. … Brown, 832 F.2d at 130 .

    Cited 61 timesPublished
  • Cetto v. Lasalle Bank National Ass'n

    518 F.3d 263 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 29, 2008

    But see Anderson v. … See Robey-Harcourt v. Bencorp Financial Inc., 326 F.3d 1140, 1142-43 (10th Cir.2003); Wilson v. Homecomings Financial Network, Inc., 407 F.Supp.2d 893, 896 (N.D.Ohio 2005); Noel v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • James Bryant, III v. Michael Stephan

    17 F.4th 513 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 15, 2021

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-4 JAMES NATHANIEL BRYANT, III, Petitioner - Appellee, v. … Brown, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General, Caroline Scrantom, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellants.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mohammad Musa Yousefi v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    260 F.3d 318 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 8, 2001

    See INS v. CardozaFonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 448 (1987). Thus, we give"due deference to the [Board's] interpretation of the deportation statute," Cabral v. … INS v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Arlin Murphy v. Jumacris Mining, Incorporated Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

    73 F.3d 358 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 26, 1995

    Arlin MURPHY, Petitioner, v. JUMACRIS MINING, INCORPORATED; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents. No. 95-2062. … Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Murphy v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States

    34 F.2d 100 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 1, 1929

    Co. v. Fletcher Co., 296 F. 855 (C. C. … Company v. Fletcher, supra.”

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Drovers' & Mechanics' Nat. Bank of Baltimore v. First Nat. Bank of Sutton

    260 F. 9 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 1, 1919

    The Baltimore bank required a resolution of the board of directors authorizing the loan. … Taenzer v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co., 170 Fed. 240 , 95 C. C. A. 436 ; Hoard v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry., 123 U. S. 222 , 8 Sup. Ct. 74, 31 L. Ed. 130 ; W. E. Austin Co. v. T. R. Smith Co., 138 Ga. 651 , 75 S.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Lorenzo Kofa v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law American Immigration Lawyers Association Legal Action Center of the American Immigration Law Foundation National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild, Amici Curiae. Jorge Samuel Moreno v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    60 F.3d 1084 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 27, 1995

    Inc. v. … Because the Board's interpretation is permissible and reasonable, we uphold it. Mosquera-Perez v. INS, 3 F.3d 553, 558-59 (1st Cir.1993); Ramirez-Ramos, 814 F.2d at 1397 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Jessie Glass, Jr.

    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 2, 2025

    Lowrance arranged an in-person meeting between April and Heather Brown, a police officer in Virginia. … See United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Froelich v. Senior Campus Living LLC

    355 F.3d 802 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 22, 2004

    FROELICH v. … FROELICH v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Johnny Wayne Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg County

    411 F.2d 586 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 27, 1969

    Co. of New York v. Holly, 135 F.2d 675 (7 Cir. 1943), which Congress has given it over district courts, Roche v. … Evaporated Milk Ass’n, 319 U.S. 21 , 63 S.Ct. 938 , 87 L.Ed. 1185 (1943), and administrative boards and agencies, Board of Governors, etc., v. Transamerica Corp., 184 F.2d 311 (9 Cir. 1950).

    Cited 343 timesPublished
  • Scotch Whisky Ass'n v. Majestic Distilling Co.

    958 F.2d 594 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 4, 1992

    In 1986, SWA filed an opposition proceeding with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the Board) against Majestic’s application to register the mark BLACK *596 WATCH for its gin and vodka products. … We think rather that the District of Columbia Circuit in Noxell Corp. v.

    Cited 68 timesPublished
  • Charlene MONROE, Appellee, v. BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant

    784 F.2d 568 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 28, 1986

    He then considered Brown, a white, for the position and granted her the promotion. … Anderson v. Bessemer City, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1504 , 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985); Pullman Standard v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Howard Mark Sandler v. Curtis W. Tarr, National Director of Selective Service

    463 F.2d 1096 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 25, 1972

    PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from a denial of preinduction relief ’by a registrant, who was refused by his Selective Service Board a Class III-A fatherhood classification pursuant to the terms of the exception incorporated … Supp. 1 , and entitled to the benefit of the injunction granted by the District Court in that case, he should have been reclassified in Class III-A by his Selective Service Board in accordance with the judgment entered by

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • ABT Building Products Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance

    472 F.3d 99 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 19, 2006

    Moreover, the court in Brown reached its result by interpreting an ambiguous policy provision against the issuing insurer, as North Carolina law requires. See Brown, 390 S.E.2d at 154. … Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co. v. North- field Ins. Co., 524 S.E.2d 558, 563 (N.C. 2000); Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 390 S.E.2d 150, 153 (N.C. 1990); see also N. C. Ins. Guar. Ass’n v. Century Indem.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.