Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.43s
John E. Holliman v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company
852 F.2d 759 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 26, 1988
Holliman petitions for review of a decision of the Benefits Review Board (Board) which reversed an administrative law judge’s (AU) award of reinstatement with back pay under section 49 of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ … Geddes v. BRB, 735 F.2d 1412, 1415 (D.C.Cir.1984). . First, an employer must commit a discriminatory act, id., “the essence of [which] lies in the different treatment of like groups or individuals.” Dickens v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedWilliam Christopher Brown v. Howard E. Friedman, Clerk, Maryland Court of Special Appeals, Defendant
846 F.2d 69 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 11, 1988
William Christopher BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Howard E. FRIEDMAN, Clerk, Maryland Court of Special Appeals, Defendant- Appellee. No. 88-6506. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 29, 1988. … Brown v. Friedman, C/A No. 87-2282-H (D.Md. Dec. 17, 1987). 2 AFFIRMED.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedDavid Kenneth Yost, Sr. v. John Brown, Warden and Manager of M.C.I.H. And W.P.D.C.
836 F.2d 548 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 30, 1987
David Kenneth YOST, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John BROWN, Warden and Manager of M.C.I.H. and W.P.D.C., Defendants-Appellees. No. 87-7583. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 30, 1987. … Yost v. Brown, C/A Nos. 86-2590-JFM, 86-3730-JFM (D.Md. Mar. 16, 1987). 2 AFFIRMED.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNorfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. Beckett
163 F. 479 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 27, 1908
In the case of Riley v. W. Va. Cent. & P. R. Co., 27 W. … Co. v. McDade, supra.
Cited 10 timesPublished200 F.2d 33 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 10, 1952
The owner of the tug is not an insurer against whom the mere loss of the tow raises a presumption of fault, Stevens v. … The Perth Am-boy No. 4, 2 Cir., 135 F.2d 404 ; Henry DuBois Sons v. Penn R. R., 2 Cir., 47 F.2d 172 . Accordingly, the decree of the District Court is affirmed. Affirmed.
Cited 46 timesPublishedUnited States v. Joseph Wayne Pratt
351 F.3d 131 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 5, 2003
See Brown, 832 F.2d at 130 (holding declaration of agent “fails to convince us beyond a reasonable doubt that no prejudicial contact occurred”); United States v. … Brown, 832 F.2d at 130 .
Cited 61 timesPublishedCetto v. Lasalle Bank National Ass'n
518 F.3d 263 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 29, 2008
But see Anderson v. … See Robey-Harcourt v. Bencorp Financial Inc., 326 F.3d 1140, 1142-43 (10th Cir.2003); Wilson v. Homecomings Financial Network, Inc., 407 F.Supp.2d 893, 896 (N.D.Ohio 2005); Noel v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedJames Bryant, III v. Michael Stephan
17 F.4th 513 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 15, 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-4 JAMES NATHANIEL BRYANT, III, Petitioner - Appellee, v. … Brown, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General, Caroline Scrantom, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellants.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMohammad Musa Yousefi v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
260 F.3d 318 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 8, 2001
See INS v. CardozaFonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 448 (1987). Thus, we give"due deference to the [Board's] interpretation of the deportation statute," Cabral v. … INS v.
Cited 0 timesPublished73 F.3d 358 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 26, 1995
Arlin MURPHY, Petitioner, v. JUMACRIS MINING, INCORPORATED; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents. No. 95-2062. … Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Murphy v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNewport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States
34 F.2d 100 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 1, 1929
Co. v. Fletcher Co., 296 F. 855 (C. C. … Company v. Fletcher, supra.”
Cited 34 timesPublishedDrovers' & Mechanics' Nat. Bank of Baltimore v. First Nat. Bank of Sutton
260 F. 9 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 1, 1919
The Baltimore bank required a resolution of the board of directors authorizing the loan. … Taenzer v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co., 170 Fed. 240 , 95 C. C. A. 436 ; Hoard v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry., 123 U. S. 222 , 8 Sup. Ct. 74, 31 L. Ed. 130 ; W. E. Austin Co. v. T. R. Smith Co., 138 Ga. 651 , 75 S.
Cited 18 timesPublished60 F.3d 1084 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 27, 1995
Inc. v. … Because the Board's interpretation is permissible and reasonable, we uphold it. Mosquera-Perez v. INS, 3 F.3d 553, 558-59 (1st Cir.1993); Ramirez-Ramos, 814 F.2d at 1397 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States v. Jessie Glass, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 2, 2025
Lowrance arranged an in-person meeting between April and Heather Brown, a police officer in Virginia. … See United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFroelich v. Senior Campus Living LLC
355 F.3d 802 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 22, 2004
FROELICH v. … FROELICH v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedJohnny Wayne Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg County
411 F.2d 586 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 27, 1969
Co. of New York v. Holly, 135 F.2d 675 (7 Cir. 1943), which Congress has given it over district courts, Roche v. … Evaporated Milk Ass’n, 319 U.S. 21 , 63 S.Ct. 938 , 87 L.Ed. 1185 (1943), and administrative boards and agencies, Board of Governors, etc., v. Transamerica Corp., 184 F.2d 311 (9 Cir. 1950).
Cited 343 timesPublishedScotch Whisky Ass'n v. Majestic Distilling Co.
958 F.2d 594 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 4, 1992
In 1986, SWA filed an opposition proceeding with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the Board) against Majestic’s application to register the mark BLACK *596 WATCH for its gin and vodka products. … We think rather that the District of Columbia Circuit in Noxell Corp. v.
Cited 68 timesPublishedCharlene MONROE, Appellee, v. BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant
784 F.2d 568 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 28, 1986
He then considered Brown, a white, for the position and granted her the promotion. … Anderson v. Bessemer City, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1504 , 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985); Pullman Standard v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedHoward Mark Sandler v. Curtis W. Tarr, National Director of Selective Service
463 F.2d 1096 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 25, 1972
PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from a denial of preinduction relief ’by a registrant, who was refused by his Selective Service Board a Class III-A fatherhood classification pursuant to the terms of the exception incorporated … Supp. 1 , and entitled to the benefit of the injunction granted by the District Court in that case, he should have been reclassified in Class III-A by his Selective Service Board in accordance with the judgment entered by
Cited 7 timesPublishedABT Building Products Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance
472 F.3d 99 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 19, 2006
Moreover, the court in Brown reached its result by interpreting an ambiguous policy provision against the issuing insurer, as North Carolina law requires. See Brown, 390 S.E.2d at 154. … Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co. v. North- field Ins. Co., 524 S.E.2d 558, 563 (N.C. 2000); Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 390 S.E.2d 150, 153 (N.C. 1990); see also N. C. Ins. Guar. Ass’n v. Century Indem.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna