Case law

Tyrone, Inc., a Virginia Corporation, Trading as Lee Art Theatre, and Howard William Burtnett v. James B. Wilkinson, Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Richmond, Virginia, and Frank S. Duling, Chief of Police for the City of Richmond, Virginia, Tyrone, Inc., a Virginia Corporation, Trading as Lee Art Theatre, and Howard William Burtnett v. James B. Wilkinson, Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Richmond, Virginia, and Frank S. Duling, Chief of Police for the City of Richmond, Virginia

410 F.2d 639 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 6, 1969

Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, 354 U.S. 436 , 77 S.Ct. 1325 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1469 (1957). An order to show cause why the film should not be seized as obscene presents another possibility. … injunction restraining the enforcement, operation or execution of any State statute by restraining the action of any officer of such State in the enforcement or execution of such statute or of an order made by an administrative board

Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

245 F. App'x 249 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 14, 2007

Upon finding his claim barred, Richardson appealed to the Board. The Board reversed the order of the ALJ based on its interpretation of Chavez v. … Brown & Root, Inc. v. Sain, 162 F.3d 813, 816 (4th Cir. 1998); see 33 U.S.C. § 903(a).

Mark Dibuo, a Minor, by His Parents and Next Friends, James and Wendy Dibuo James Dibuo Wendy Dibuo v. Board of Education of Worcester County Jon Andes, Officially, Mark Dibuo, a Minor, by His Parents and Next Friends, James and Wendy Dibuo James Dibuo Wendy Dibuo v. Board of Education of Worcester County Jon Andes, Officially

309 F.3d 184 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 28, 2002

Board of Education of Worcester County; Jon Andes, Officially, Defendants-Appellants. Mark DiBuo, a minor, by his parents and next friends, James and Wendy DiBuo; James DiBuo; Wendy DiBuo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. … As the Supreme Court stated in Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District v.

Picklesimer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

54 F.2d 1022 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 12, 1932

A meeting of the board on December 31, 1924, decided to eliminate Yarney’s salary.. … Guarantee Co. v. Mechanics’ Co., 183 U. S. 402 , 22 S. Ct. 124 , 46 L. Ed. 253 ; National Surety Co. v. Globe Grain & Milling Co. (C. C. A.) 256 F. 601 , 4 A. L. R. 552; Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Courtney, 186 U.

Helvering v. Gordon

134 F.2d 685 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 2, 1943

This petition for review challenges a determination of the Board of Tax Appeals that Alice V. … In Helvering v. Jones, 8 Cir., 120 F.2d 828 , Commissioner v. Green, 3 Cir., 126 F.2d 70 , and Blum v.

Hosey v. Valley Camp Coal Co.

212 F. App'x 244 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 10, 2007

Hosey seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). … Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Board. Hosey v.

Clark v. Eastern Associated Coal Corp.

117 F. App'x 873 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 21, 2004

Clark seeks review of a decision and order of the Benefits Review Board (“Board”) affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-45 (2000). … Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Clark v.

NLRB v. Kentucky Tennessee

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 12, 2002

The Board argued that the Company had improperly raised this issue for the first time in a reply brief. See Cavallo v. … NLRB v.

Burnet v. Moore Cotton Mills Co.

49 F.2d 59 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 13, 1931

The Board of Tax Appeals has consistently followed the position now taken by the commissioner with respect to the second tax-, able year’s ineome, Chicago Nat. C. v. Commissioner, 5 B. T. A. 614; Appeal of S. W. … Gould v. Gould, 245 U. S. 151 , 38 S. Ct. 53 , 62 L. Ed. 211 ; U. S. v. Merriam, 263 U. S. 179 , 44 S. Ct. 69 , 68 L. Ed. 240 , 29 A. L. R. 1547; Reineeke v. Trust Co., 278 U. S. 339 , 49 S. Ct. 123 , 73 L.

Pettus v. American Airlines, Inc.

587 F.2d 627 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 26, 1978

ALBERT V. … The Benefits Review Board, however, concluded there were sufficient contacts of the claimant with the District to confer jurisdiction there and reversed. Pettus v. American Airlines, Inc., 3 B.R.B.S. 315, B.R.B.

Freygang v. Vera Cruz & P. R.

154 F. 640 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 29, 1907

Evans v. Western Brass Mfg. Co., 118 Mo. 548 , 34 S. W. 175 ; Southgate v. A. & P. R. R. Co., 61 Mo. 89 . … Curtis v. Innerarity, 6 How. 146 -154, 12 L. Ed. 380 ; Sturm v. Boker, 150 U. S. 312 -341, 14 Sup. Ct. 99, 37 L. Ed. 1093 ; Crescent Mining Co. v. Wasatch M. Co., 151 U. S. 317 -323, 14 Sup. Ct. 348, 38 L.

James L.M. Cromer, Jr. James A. Amick Martha N. Amick John B. Allen, Jr. Marian C. Allen Margaret W. Kherlopian Ellen P. Leggett Patricia R. Goodwin Darlene G. Jones Bruce L. Pearson Julia A. Pearson Eddie Ruth Brawley v. State of South Carolina, and Michael P. Cinnamon, Executive Director of the Richland County Executive Commission Richland County Election Commission, James L.M. Cromer, Jr. James A. Amick Martha N. Amick John B. Allen, Jr. Marian C. Allen Margaret W. Kherlopian Ellen P. Leggett Patricia R. Goodwin Darlene G. Jones Bruce L. Pearson Julia A. Pearson Eddie Ruth Brawley v. Michael P. Cinnamon, Executive Director of the Richland County Executive Commission Richland County Election Commission, and State of South Carolina

917 F.2d 819 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 30, 1990

Everything said in Anderson on these two matters applies practically across the board to the comparable assertions made by the state here. … See, e.g., Rainbow Coalition v. Oklahoma State Election Bd., 844 F.2d 740 , 746 n. 9 (10th Cir.1988); Hall v. Simcox, 766 F.2d at 1176-77 ; Dart v. Brown, 717 F.2d 1491, 1503 (5th Cir.1983); Stevenson v.

Case Farms of North Carolina, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, National Poultry Workers Organizing Committee, Intervenor. The North Carolina Poultry Federation, Amicus Curiae. National Labor Relations Board v. Case Farms of North Carolina, Incorporated, the North Carolina Poultry Federation, Amicus Curiae

128 F.3d 841 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 23, 1997

NLRB v. … Corp. v.

Claudia Lown v. Continental Casualty Company

238 F.3d 543 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 2, 2001

That year, Baptist Healthcare’s Board voted to remove itself as an agency of the South Carolina Baptist Convention. The Convention subsequently ratified the Board’s decision. … See Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch, 489 U.S. 101, 115 , 109 S.Ct. 948 , 103 L.Ed.2d 80 (1989); Haley v. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co., 77 F.3d 84, 88-89 (4th Cir.1996).

Ferguson v. City of Charleston

186 F.3d 469 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 13, 1999

V. … Bowen v.

Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Spence

591 F.2d 985 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 25, 1979

Lines v. … In Nacirema Operating Co. v. Lynn (3d Cir. 1978) 577 F.2d 852 , and State Ins. Fund v.

Willie Washington v. Harvey Earl Schuyler and Speakman Company

433 F.2d 362 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 16, 1970

See Richmond Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Brown, 203 Va. 950 , 128 S.E.2d 267 (1962); Hubbard v. Murray, 173 Va. 448 , 3 S.E.2d 397 (1939). Affirmed.

Parker v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

75 F.3d 929 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 9, 1996

See Reves v. … To require the Board to appear as a party would parallel requiring the District Court to appear and defend its decision upon direct appeal. McCord v.

Peter Kondos v. The West Virginia Board of Regents, a Statutory Corporation Under the Laws of the State of West Virginia, and Roland H. Nelson, Jr.

441 F.2d 1172 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 27, 1971

Guerra v. Scruggs

942 F.2d 270 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 9, 1991

An applicant seeking relief from this board has an absolute right to a hearing before the board, and may be represented by counsel and present witnesses. Chilcott v. Orr, 747 F.2d 29, 32 (1st Cir.1984). … Id. at 750 ; Jones v. Board of Governors of University of North Carolina, 704 F.2d 713, 715 (4th Cir.1983). 16 * In Sampson v.