Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.44s
Lcs Services, Inc. v. Hamrick, III
925 F.2d 745 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 26, 1991
Samuel, Chairman of the West Virginia Water Resources Board; Robert Butler; William N. … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMaryland Finance Corp. v. Duvall
284 F. 764 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 24, 1922
No. 12,222; Dooley v. Pease (C. C.) 79 Fed. 860 ; T. E. Wells & Co. v. Sharp, 208 Fed. 393 , 125 C. C. A. 609 (C. C. A. 8th Circuit; Bernard v. Lea, 210 Fed. 583 , 127 C. C. A. 219 (C. C. … Rep. 207, 215, 230 Fed. 171 ; Andrew Jergens Co. v. Woodbury, Inc. (D. C.) 273 Fed. 952, 962 ; Leggett v. Banking Co., 1 N. J. Eq. 541, 23 Am. Dec. 728 ; Duke v. Markham, 105 N. C. 131 , 10 S. E. 1017 , 18 Am. St.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 1, 1999
Ashe v. … V. In the alternative, the School Board argued that the district court abused its discretion with its permanent injunction.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKeener v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
372 F. App'x 399 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 29, 2010
Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. … Keener v. DOWCP, No. 08-0261-BLA (B.R.B. Nov. 25, 2008).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBradford v. School District No. 20, Charleston
364 F.2d 185 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 6, 1966
Adler v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 485 , 72 S.Ct. 380 , 96 L.Ed. 517 (1952); Garner v. Board of Public *189 Works of City of Los Angeles, 341 U.S. 716 , 71 S.Ct. 909 , 95 L.Ed. 1317 (1951). … Beilan v. Board of Education, 357 U.S. 399 , 78 S.Ct. 1317 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1414 (1958).
Cited 1 timesPublishedJoseph George Brown, Jr. v. Eric L. Olsen, Mickey Coffee, and Charles Sharp
878 F.2d 378 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 27, 1989
Joseph George BROWN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eric L. OLSEN, Mickey Coffee, Defendants-Appellees, and Charles SHARP, Defendant. No. 89-7558. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted May 22, 1989. … Brown v. Olsen, C/A No. 88-184-N (E.D.Va. Feb. 17, 1989).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished6 F. App'x 216 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 30, 2001
. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949).
Cited 0 timesPublished8 F.3d 966 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 18, 1993
Tauber contends that his interpretation of the Treasury Amendment is supported by Board of Trade v. … Board of Trade of the City of Chicago v. Christie Grain & Stock Co., 198 U.S. 236, 249 , 25 S.Ct. 637, 639 , 49 L.Ed. 1031 (1905).
Cited 86 timesPublished318 F. App'x 166 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 16, 2009
See Liverman v. Johnson, No. 3:07-cv-00344-JRS, 2008 WL 2397544 (E.D.Va. June 12, 2008).
Cited 0 timesPublishedEmpire Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
94 F.2d 307 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 4, 1938
United States v. Dietz, 8 Cir., 33 F.2d 576 ; Jacobs v. Commissioner, 8 Cir., 34 F.2d 233 , certiorari denied Jacobs v. Lucas, 280 U.S. 603 , 50 S.Ct. 85 , 74 L.Ed. 647 . See, also, Crooks v. … The Commissioner was right in disallowing the deduction and the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.
Cited 18 timesPublished310 F. App'x 608 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 6, 2009
Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. … Crihfield v. Peabody Coal Co., No. 07-0670-BLA (B.R.B. May 14, 2008).
Cited 0 timesPublished310 F. App'x 608 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 6, 2009
Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. … Crihfield v. Peabody Coal Co., No. 07-0670-BLA (B.R.B. May 14, 2008).
Cited 0 timesPublishedEddleman v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
825 F.2d 46 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 10, 1987
The court in Oystershell Alliance v. … Illinois v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 591 F.2d 12, 14 (7th Cir.1979); Porter County Chapter of the Izaak Walton League of America, Inc. v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 606 F.2d 1363 (D.C.Cir.1979).
Cited 1 timesPublished45 F.2d 174 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 29, 1930
Later on lie was reinstated by the direct orders of the Shipping Board. … See Bank Line v. Porter (C. C. A.) 25 F.(2d) 843 . The conclusions announced also disposed of the defense of the shipowner based upon section 3 of the Harter Act (D. S.
Cited 9 timesPublishedFriendly Society of Engravers and Sketchmakers v. Calico Engraving Company
238 F.2d 521 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 7, 1956
No. 573, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. p. 15; Agwilines, Inc., v. N. L. R. B., 5 Cir., 87 F.2d 146, 150, 151 ; Blankenship v. Kurfman, 7 Cir., 96 F.2d 450 ; Myers v. … The same reasoning which prohibits federal courts from intervening in such cases, except by way of review or on application of the federal Board, precludes • state courts from doing so.” *524 In Weber v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBrewster v. Westmoreland Coal Co.
305 F. App'x 75 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 15, 2008
Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. … Brewster v. Westmoreland Coal Co., Inc., No. 07-0835-BLA (B.R.B. June 30, 2008).
Cited 0 timesPublished435 F.2d 1062 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 18, 1970
But we do not suggest that a local board is necessarily controlled by the certification of the college. … See United States v. Brooks, 415 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1969).
Cited 6 timesPublished37 F.3d 1493 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 11, 1994
Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Groseclose v. … DOWCP, No. 92-2622-BLA (Benefits Review Board Jan. 27, 1994).
Cited 0 timesPublishedItmann Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
673 F. App'x 319 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 18, 2017
PER CURIAM Itmann Coal Company seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits to former miner Marvin Lawrence, pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ … Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the Board’s decision is based on substantial evidence and is without reversible error. *320 See Lawrence v. Itmann Coal Co., No. 15-0123 BLA (B.R.B. Jan. 29, 2016).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDenrick Eric Brown v. Warden Johnson, D.K. Smith, Assistant Warden, Edward Carey, Doctor
877 F.2d 59 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 5, 1989
Denrick Eric BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden JOHNSON, D.K. Smith, Assistant Warden, Edward Carey, Doctor, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-6524. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. … Denrick Eric Brown, appellant pro se. Before HARRISON L. WINTER, MURNAGHAN, and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Denrick Eric Brown appeals the district court's order dismissing this 42 U.S.C.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna