Case law

The Old Point Comfort

187 F. 765 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 2, 1911

As said by Judge Brown in The Alberta (D. … Point, it is unnecessary to decide between these conflicting theories, for we are satisfied, from a consideration of all the testimony'and from the physical facts, that the schooner, when first seen by the witnesses on board

Thomas B. Bryant, to His Own Use and to the Use of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Partenreederei-Ernest Russ, Partenreederei-Ernest Russ v. Oriole Ship Ceiling Co., Inc.

330 F.2d 185 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 1, 1964

Seas Shipping Co. v. Sieracki, supra; Mahnich v. Southern S. S. … Compare Rodriguez v.

Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co

201 F.2d 36 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 5, 1953

And it is equally clear that the exercise of discretion by the board with respect to such matters is not subject to review by the courts. Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 320 U. … Co. v.

Mesfin Tsegaye v. National Transportation Safety Board Federal Aviation Administration

51 F.3d 268 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 10, 1995

Mesfin TSEGAYE, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD; Federal Aviation Administration, Respondents. No. 94-1995. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued March 10, 1995. … OPINION PER CURIAM: 1 Mesfin Tsegaye petitions for review of an order of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), suspending his pilot's certificate for 90 days.

Buchanan v. Gilmore

139 F.3d 982 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 26, 1998

V, § 12. The Lieutenant Gov- ernor is authorized to act only if the Governor is"unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office." Va. Const. art. V, § 16. … Brown, his expert witness. Dr. Brown was allowed to testify that Buchanan was under extreme emotional distress at the time of the killings. He was also allowed to testify about evidence in support of his conclusions.

P. Lorillard Co. v. Federal Trade Commission

186 F.2d 52 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 29, 1950

As said by this court in National Labor Relations Board v. … See also McComb v. Homeworkers’ Handicraft Corp., 4 Cir., 176 F.2d 633, 640, 641 , and Wallace Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 141 F.2d 87, 91 . The case last cited is very much in point.

Nancy Grizzle v. Pickands Mather And Company

994 F.2d 1093 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 2, 1993

A. 11 Our review of the Board's decision is governed by section 21 of the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 921 . 30 U.S.C. § 932 (a); Director, OWCP v. … In Shuff v.

First South Production Credit Ass'n v. Farm Credit Administration

926 F.2d 339 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 19, 1991

Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System v. Dimension Financial Corp., 474 U.S. 361 , 106 S.Ct, 681 , 88 L.Ed.2d 691 (1986) (action of agency inconsistent with the language of the statute). … V.

Richardson v. Virginia Department of Corrections

332 F. App'x 930 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 5, 2009

See Richardson v. Virginia Dep’t of Corr., No. 3:07-cv-00514-REP (E.D.Va. Jan. 8, 2009). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s order.

Christopher Phelps & Associates, LLC v. Galloway

477 F.3d 128 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 12, 2007

See Xoom v. … See Walker v.

Willis v. Town of Marshall, North Carolina

275 F. App'x 227 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 30, 2008

A committee (“the Committee”) appointed by the Town’s Board of Aldermen (“the Board”) coordinates events at the Depot. … v.

Cruz v. Holder

356 F. App'x 651 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 15, 2009

PER CURIAM: German Jose Cruz, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision finding Cruz removable and denying his … We have reviewed the administrative record and Cruz’s claims and find no error in the Board’s decision. See Rusu v. INS, 296 F.3d 316 , 320-22 (4th Cir.2002).

Frey & Son, Inc. v. United States

1 F.2d 963 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 29, 1924

Libelant did not seek information from the Shipping Board and made no effort to see the contract of sale. … Ed. 274 ; Deibert Barge Building Co. v. United States (4th Circuit) 289 F. 805 ; Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. United States (2d Circuit) 1 F. (2d) 233; The P. H. Gill & Sons Forge & Machine Works v.

Robinson v. Pinderhughes

810 F.2d 1270 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 30, 1987

See also Teresa *1273 Diane P. v. Alieflndep. … See SEC v. Chenery Corf., 318 U.S. 80, 88 , 63 S.Ct. 454, 459 , 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943).

Federal Trade Commission v. Andris Pukke

53 F.4th 80 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 1, 2022

Green v. … v. Wagman Constr.

United States v. James Edward Elston, Jr.

479 F.3d 314 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 13, 2007

See United States v. … No such emergency was presented in either J.L. or Brown .

Carroll E. Wade v. Dave Robinson, Warden

327 F.3d 328 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 22, 2003

He was found guilty of parole violations by the Virginia Parole Board on April 3, 1997 and his parole was revoked. … See, e.g., California Dept. of Corrections v. Morales, 514 U.S. 499 , 115 S.Ct. 1597 , 131 L.Ed.2d 588 (1995) (deciding a federal habeas challenge to the state’s deferment of petitioner’s parole hearing); Preiser v.

Messan v. Gonzales

213 F. App'x 217 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 9, 2007

PER CURIAM: Ayaba Mana Messan, a native and citizen of Togo, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reconsider its prior order, which adopted and affirmed the … We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a) (2006); Jean v.

Nan Chen v. Gonzales

212 F. App'x 213 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 5, 2007

PER CURIAM: Nan Chen, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying a motion to reconsider a prior order affirming the immigration … We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a) (2006); Jean v.

McElvaine v. Tradesman International Inc.

471 F. App'x 127 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 9, 2012

Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon *128 substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. … McElvaine v. Tradesman Int’l Inc., Nos. 10-0486; 10-0486A (B.R.B. Apr. 20, 2011).