Case law

United States v. Rapid Coaling & Transfer Co.

289 F. 803 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 10, 1923

Since this decision was rendered, the Supreme Court of the United States on January 2, 1923, in the case of United States v. Carver, 43 Sup. Ct. 181, 67 L. … It follows under the Carver decision aforesaid, and the decision of this court in the case of United States v.

Robert Lee Case v. State of North Carolina

315 F.2d 743 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 25, 1963

State v. Manning, 251 N.C. 1 , 110 S.E.2d 474 (1959); State v. Manning, 251 N.C. 1 , 110 S.E.2d 474 (1959); State v. McMillan, 233 N.C. 630 , 65 S.E.2d 212 (1951). . Brown v. … Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953), but Brown v. Allen in no way relaxes the duty of the Federal Court to make its own constitutional determination. Holly v.

Lois Gibson v. State of Maryland

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 14, 2025

Buscemi v. Bell, 964 F.3d 252, 261 (4th Cir. 2020). … Gibson v. Maryland, No. 1:22-cv-01642-SAG (D. Md. Dec. 16, 2022 & Mar. 29, 2023).

Baltimore Sun Co v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 18, 2001

 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,  Petitioner, v. … Even if this question were close, the Board should have resolved it by an election. See Stevens Ford, 773 F.2d at 473; NLRB v.

George W. Ferguson v. Wyndham Manning, Superintendent of the South Carolina Prison

216 F.2d 188 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 6, 1954

State v. Ferguson, 221 S.C. 300 , 70 S.E.2d 355 . … Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 458 , 73 S.Ct. 397, 407 , 97 L.Ed. 469 . Affirmed.

Smith v. County Of Albemarle

895 F.2d 953 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 28, 1990

They sued the Board of Supervisors and the County of Albemarle under 42 U.S.C. … Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 461 , 100 S.Ct. 2286, 2290 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980).

United States of America, and Molita Bryant Wesley Palmer, Parties in Interest v. Thomas E. Smith, Jr., A/K/A Anthony Young, United States of America, and Molita Bryant Wesley Palmer, Parties in Interest v. Tyrone Smallwood

452 F.3d 323 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 30, 2006

See United States v. … For example, when defense counsel was questioning Brown about possible discrepancies in his account, the district court asked Brown if he had "go[ne] up to the body after Shelton was shot," suggesting that Brown was in a

H.P. Hood, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

30 F. App'x 148 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 1, 2002

HOOD, INC. v. … See Liteky v.

Edwards v. City of Goldsboro

178 F.3d 231 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 14, 1999

Indeed, we have recognized "[t]he right to associate in order to express one's views is 'inseparable' from the right to speak freely" Cromer v. Brown, 88 F.3d 1315, 1331 (4th Cir.1996) (quoting Thomas v. … Pembaur, 475 U.S. at 481 ; see also Board of County Com'rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405-06 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997)(affirming this reading of Pembaur ).

American Federation of Tobacco Growers, Inc. v. Neal

183 F.2d 869 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 29, 1950

Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. … In the case of United States v.

Ricardo Prudencio v. Eric Holder, Jr.

669 F.3d 472 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 30, 2012

He petitions this Court for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (the Board), in which the Board dismissed his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision classifying him as an alien subject to removal … Although DHS did not appeal the Board’s decision, the Attorney General directed that the Board refer the case to him under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1 (h)(1)(i).

Harman v. Levin

772 F.2d 1150 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 17, 1985

Although the Supreme Court noted in Hensley v. … In 1616 Reminc Limited Partnership v. Atchison & Keller Co.

Warren v. Baskerville

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 13, 2000

Virginia Parole Board Policy Manual, Part II.J.4 (July 1997). 4 WARREN v. … WARREN v.

Mbodo v. Gonzales

176 F. App'x 352 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 10, 2006

PER CURIAM: Rachel Jean Laurence Mbodo, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reconsider its prior order, which adopted and … We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a) (2005); Jean v.

Anthony Wright v. Kenneth Lassiter

921 F.3d 413 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 17, 2019

JOYNER; BETTY BROWN; R. SPEER; TERRI C. STRATTON, Defendants – Appellees, and VAN MCCULLOUGH; B. … Andon, LLC v. City of Newport News, 813 F.3d 510, 515 (4th Cir. 2016); cf. Bader v.

Morton v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

104 F.2d 534 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 12, 1939

Consolidated Tea Company v. Bowers, D. C., 19 F.2d 382 ; Ewing Thomas Converting Company v. McCaughn, 3 Cir., 43 F.2d 503 . The Board has held to the same effect in a number of cases. Russell Wheel & Foundry Co. v. … A. 1168; Manville Jenckes Co. v. Com’r, 4 B. T. A. 765; Pacific Novelty Co. v. Com’r, 5 B. T. A. 1017; Peninsula Shipbuilding Co. v. Com’r, 9 B. T. A. 189; Arabol Manufacturing Co. v. Com’r, 26 B. T. A. 1068.

Otto Walker v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Eastern Associated Coal Corporation

927 F.2d 181 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 6, 1991

Our review of a decision of the Benefits Review Board is governed by the same standard the Board applies when it reviews the AU's decision. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Chubb, 741 F.2d 968, 971 (7th Cir.1984). … Peabody Coal Co. v. Helms, 859 F.2d 486, 489 (7th Cir.1988); Kertesz v. Crescent Hills Coal Co., 788 F.2d 158, 163 (3d Cir.1986). 5 . Dr.

Ramey ex rel. Ramey v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

326 F.3d 474 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 14, 2003

See Gustafson v. … The Board itself has consistently recognized that the BLBA does not permit settlement. See Gerzarowski v. Lehigh Valley Anthracite, Inc., 1988 WL 232653 , at *2 (DOL Ben. Rev. Bd.); Myers v.

Westmoreland Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

539 F. App'x 253 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 18, 2013

PER CURIAM: Westmoreland Coal Company petitions for review of the Benefits Review Board’s (“Board”) decision and order affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) grant of benefits to former employee Carl Ramey under … Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Westmoreland Coal Co. v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs, No. 11-0807-BLA (Aug. 31, 2012).

May v. Horton

403 F. App'x 850 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 1, 2010

May v. Horton, No. 5:09-ct-03081-BO, 2010 WL 2990198 (E.D.N.C. July 29, 2010).