Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca4

10,000+ results

0.43s

  • Gabaldoni v. Washington Cnty Hosp

    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 17, 2001

    J.A. 154. 4 GABALDONI v. … The GABALDONI v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • NC NAACP State Conference v. Ken Raymond

    981 F.3d 295 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 2, 2020

    See Veasey v. … In Lee v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Whaley v. American Freehold Land-Mortg. Co. of London

    74 F. 73 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 5, 1896

    Fowler v. Trust Co., 141 U. S. 385 , 12 Sup. Ct. 1; Grant v. Insurance Co., 121 U. S. 105 , 7 Sup. Ct. 841; Call v. Palmer, 116 U. S. 98 , 6 Sup. … This was the controlling fact in Bates v. Mortgage Co., 37 S. C. 90, 16 S. E. 883 ; in Brown v. Brown, 38 S. C. 173, 17 S. E. 452 ; in Sherwood v. Roundtree, 32 Fed. 122 ; and in Security Co. v. Gay, 33 Fed. 636 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Kraus v. Selective Service System Local 25

    408 F.2d 622 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 13, 1969

    KRAUS, Appellant, v. SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM LOCAL 25 (Board Members: Joseph Hirshfield, Hurley Cox, and Jerome Dashner); Colonel James L. Hays, as Director Selective Service, State of Maryland; and Lt. … See also Boyd v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Robert Lynn Williamson v. Weatherholtz California Board of Prison Terms

    953 F.2d 1383 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 6, 1992

    Robert Lynn WILLIAMSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WEATHERHOLTZ; California Board of Prison Terms, Respondents-Appellees. No. 91-7110. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 7, 1991. … Williamson v. Weatherholtz, No. CA-90-737-R (W.D.Va. Apr. 30, 1991).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • The Gauley Mountain Coal Company (Williams River No. 1 Mine) v. Director of the United States Bureau of Mines

    224 F.2d 887 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 30, 1955

    We agree with the Board that it was never intended by the statute that the Board should review or set aside or *889 ders of the state authorities classifying mines as gaseous. Cf. Davies Warehouse Co. v. … The order of the Board will be affirmed. Affirmed. 1 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Blake

    819 F.2d 71 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 20, 1987

    After the appellants’ trial, Swain of course was overruled by Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). … We heard arguments on this appeal in June 1986, but delayed a decision pending the Supreme Court’s ruling in Griffith v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Ernesto Dominguez, Angel Louis Estevez and Carlos Sarmiento, United States of America v. Nollie S. Alexander, United States of America v. Ronnie Wayne Neill

    604 F.2d 304 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 10, 1979

    A Coast Guard boarding party boarded the Sea Crust, which by this time was more than 200 miles from the shore of the United States. The boarding party found six tons of marijuana. … See United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862, 884 (5th Cir. 1979); United States v. Cadena, 585 F.2d 1252, 1259 (5th Cir. 1978); United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Custom Ship Interiors v. Roberts

    300 F.3d 510 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 15, 2002

    The Benefits Review Board reversed. Because the injury occurred in Virginia, the law of this circuit was controlling. See 33 U.S.C. § 921 (c). And under Universal Maritime Service Corp. v. … For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the Benefits Review Board. AFFIRMED. Custom Ship’s reliance on McNutt v. Benefits Review Board, 140 F.3d 1247 (9th Cir.1998), is similarly unavailing.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Al Shimari v. Caci International, Inc.

    658 F.3d 413 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 21, 2011

    See Nixon v. … See Carmichael v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 572 F.3d 1271 (11th Cir.2009). II I would also conclude that this suit is barred by the doctrine of derívate absolute immunity, as articulated in Mangold v.

    Vacated by Al Shimari v. CACI International, Inc., 679 F.3d 205 (2012)Cited 17 timesPublished
  • H.P. Hood, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    30 F. App'x 148 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 1, 2002

    HOOD, INC. v. … See Liteky v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Robinson v. Pinderhughes

    810 F.2d 1270 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 30, 1987

    See also Teresa *1273 Diane P. v. Alieflndep. … See SEC v. Chenery Corf., 318 U.S. 80, 88 , 63 S.Ct. 454, 459 , 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943).

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Otto Walker v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Eastern Associated Coal Corporation

    927 F.2d 181 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 6, 1991

    Our review of a decision of the Benefits Review Board is governed by the same standard the Board applies when it reviews the AU's decision. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Chubb, 741 F.2d 968, 971 (7th Cir.1984). … Peabody Coal Co. v. Helms, 859 F.2d 486, 489 (7th Cir.1988); Kertesz v. Crescent Hills Coal Co., 788 F.2d 158, 163 (3d Cir.1986). 5 . Dr.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • United States v. Hairston

    46 F.3d 361 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 1, 1995

    There was a possibility that the Board would penalize Larco. Just before the Board’s meeting, Sumler visited William G. Smith, the president of the company. … The Supreme Court held in McCormick v.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • DILLARD Et Al. v. CHESAPEAKE & O. RY. CO. Et Al.

    199 F.2d 948 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 10, 1952

    Case Co. v. … The claims here cannot be resolved by interpretation of a bargaining agreement so as to give jurisdiction to the Adjustment Board under our holding in Slocum v. Delaware, L. & W. R.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Clayton

    56 F.3d 60 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 5, 1995

    James Michael Brown, BROWN, LEVICOFF & MCDYER, Beckley, WV, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Jeffrey Todd ones, HUNT, LEES, FARRELL & KESSLER, Charleston, WV, for Appellants. … Johnson Corp. v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of N. Am., 164 N.E.2d 704, 707 (N.Y.1959)); see also Uniroyal, Inc. v. Home Ins.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tait v. Western Maryland Ry. Co.

    62 F.2d 933 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 10, 1933

    When the case was argued in this court, the Commissioner did not rely on this point, for the reason that in the meantime the Board had held to. the opposite effect in Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Commissioner, 13 B. T. … It was shown in Sage v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Scarborough v. Ridgeway

    726 F.2d 132 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 17, 1984

    See, e.g., Willie M. v. Hunt, 657 F.2d 55 (4 Cir. 1981); Courtaulds North American, Inc. v. North Carolina National Bank, 528 F.2d 802 (4 Cir.1975); Jersey Insurance Co. v. Heffron, 242 F.2d 136 (4 Cir.1957). … the Board’s exclusive representative.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Ivan Goldstein v. The Chestnut Ridge Volunteer Fire Company

    25 F.3d 1039 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 31, 1994

    Charles Grant Byrd, Jr., Brown, Alston & Byrd, Baltimore, MD, for appellee. Joan E. Book, Kruchko & Fries, Baltimore, MD, for appellant. Dwayne A. Brown, Brown, Alston & Byrd, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee. D.Md. … Haavistola v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • George D. Duffield v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.

    503 F.2d 512 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 26, 1974

    National Labor Relations Board v. Donnelly Co., supra (330 U.S. at 236-237, 67 S.Ct. at 765) made this clear. … National Labor Relations Board v. Donnelly Co. (1947) 330 U.S. 219, 236-237 , 67 S.Ct. 756 , 91 L.Ed. 854 6 Cf., Refior v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.