Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.89s
Consolidation Coal Co. v. Gilbert
561 F. App'x 257 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 19, 2014
Our review of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. … Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Gilbert, No. 12-0427-BLA (B.R.B. May 30, 2013).
Cited 0 timesPublished332 F. App'x 837 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 6, 2009
. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBorden, Inc. v. Bakery & Confectionery Union & Industry International Pension
974 F.2d 528 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 4, 1992
Co. v. … See United States v.
Cited 2 timesPublished424 F. App'x 215 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 19, 2011
Brown, DUANE MORRIS LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Douglas E. Ginsburg, Assistant Director, Katherine A. … Anim v. Mukasey, 535 F.3d 243, 256 (4th Cir. 2008); Rusu v. INS, 296 F.3d 316, 320- 22, 324 (4th Cir. 2002).
Cited 1 timesUnpublishedStapleton v. Westmoreland Coal Co.
785 F.2d 424 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 26, 1986
United States Department of Labor Benefits Review Board, 733 F.2d 346 (4th Cir.1984), and Hampton v. United States Department of Labor Benefits Review Board, 678 F.2d 506 (4th. Cir.1982) (per curiam), are overruled. … See, e.g., Whicker v. U.S. Dept. of Labor Benefits Review Board, 733 F.2d 346 (4th Cir.1984), Consolidation Coal Co. v. Sanati, 713 F.2d 480 (4th Cir.1983), and Hampton v. U.S.
Reversed by Mullins Coal Co. of Va. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, 484 U.S. 135 (1988)Cited 80 timesPublishedBaltimore Mail S. S. Co. v. United States
76 F.2d 582 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 2, 1935
, as certified by the Secretary of the Treasury to the board upon its request. … Alabama v. United States, 282 U. S. 502 , 51 S. Ct. 225 , 75 L. Ed. 492 ; Sutton v. United States, 256 U. S. 575 , 41 S. Ct. 563 , 65 L. Ed. 1099 , 19 A. L. R. 403; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. United States, 261 U.
Cited 16 timesPublishedJohn W. Hancock, Jr., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
73 F. App'x 617 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 3, 2003
The General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (the Board) charged Hancock (i) with violating § 8(a)(1) of the NLRA JOHN W. HANCOCK v. … We "may [not] displace the Board’s choice between two fairly conflicting views." Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 (1951).
Cited 2 timesUnpublishedPleasant View Elementary School PTA v. Group 1
763 F.2d 652 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 6, 1985
Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz, 449 U.S. 166, 174-75 , 101 S.Ct. 453, 459-60 , 66 L.Ed.2d 368 (1980); San Antonio Independent School District v. … United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 726 , 86 S.Ct. 1130, 1139 , 16 L.Ed.2d 218 ; Sigmon v. Poe, 564 F.2d 1093, 1096 (4th Cir.1977). In this case the district court did not abuse that discretion.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCoalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 31, 2022
Stay factors I agree the Board is entitled to a stay pending appeal under the traditional Nken standard. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009). … See Fisher v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedInterstate Petroleum Corp. v. Morgan
228 F.3d 331 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 8, 2000
Co. v. … Under Franchise Tax Board v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedTerri-Ann Ramtulla v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
301 F.3d 202 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 22, 2002
The Board of Immigration Appeals upheld the IJ. Ramtulla petitions this court for review of the Board’s decision. II. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review the question on direct review. … Calcano-Martinez v. INS, 533 U.S. 348, 350, n. 2 , 121 S.Ct. 2268 , 150 L.Ed.2d 392 (2001); Lewis v.
Cited 71 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Coastal Fisheries Reform Group v. Capt. Gaston LLC
76 F.4th 291 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 7, 2023
Ct. at 2608 (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 159–60 (2000). … Ct. at 2612–13; Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. at 144; Train v. Colorado Pub. Interest Rsch. Grp., Inc., 426 U.S. 1, 23–25 (1976).
Cited 1 timesPublishedBlack Diamond Construction, Inc. v. Hayton
554 F. App'x 143 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 6, 2014
Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. … Black Diamond Constr., Inc. v. Hayton, No. 12-0341-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 30, 2013).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 3, 2003
See Haydo v. … HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY v. NORTON case was on appeal to the Board, OSM admitted that it had not done its job.
Cited 0 timesPublished81 F.3d 490 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 18, 1996
We find (as did the Board) that the ALJ’s decision to award benefits is supported by substantial evidence and is in accordance with law, see Jewell Smokeless Coal Corp. v. … Generally speaking, the Board’s interpretation of regulations is not entitled to deference. Id.; Bethlehem Mines Corp. v. Massey, 736 F.2d 120 , 123 n. 1 (4th Cir.1984). But cf. Fleetwood v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedNial Ruth Cox v. A. M. Stanton, M.D.
529 F.2d 47 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 6, 1975
The director of the Washington County Welfare Agency then allegedly petitioned the Eugenics Board to order Miss Cox’s sterilization. According to the complaint, this board authorized Dr. A. M. … See also Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 , 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971); Singleton v. Vance County Board of Education, supra, (Winter, J., concurring and dissenting); Dahl v.
Cited 220 timesPublished224 F.3d 293 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 16, 2000
MILLER, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ALPHONSO L. GRANT, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as a member of the City of Lynchburg Electoral Board; JOHN E. … Industries v.
Cited 0 timesPublished64 F.3d 944 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 13, 1995
V. … See Banque Worms v. BankAmerica Int'l, 77 N.Y.2d 362 , 568 N.Y.S.2d 541 , 570 N.E.2d 189, 195 (N.Y.1991). 8 . See CSX Transp. v.
Cited 44 timesPublishedCypress v. Newport News General & Nonsectarian Hospital Ass'n
375 F.2d 648 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 9, 1967
See Anderson v. … Eaton v. Grubbs, 329 F.2d 710 (4th Cir. 1964). . Deposition of Mr. Charles K. Hutchens, Chairman of the Board of Managers since 1952 and member of the Board for over twenty years. But see Part IV infra. .
Cited 148 timesPublishedHerman Fulton v. James Brown, Captain Lacy Thornburg
865 F.2d 1257 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 6, 1989
Herman FULTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James BROWN, Captain; Lacy Thornburg, Respondents-Appellees. No. 88-6749. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: Nov. 29, 1988. Decided: Jan. 6, 1989. … Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985); Strickland v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna