Case law

Lewis v. Holder

388 F. App'x 248 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 8, 2010

PER CURIAM: Elvis David Lewis, a native and citizen of Grenada, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his untimely motion to reopen. … See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1252 (a)(2)(C), (D) (2006); 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (d)(1) (2006); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400-01 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 137 , 175 L.Ed.2d 90 (2009).

Timberlake v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

132 F.2d 259 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 8, 1942

Helvering v. Bartlett and Commissioner v. … The decision of the Board is affirmed.

Roller v. Gunn

107 F.3d 227 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 19, 1997

Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles, 59 F.3d 1145 , 1149 n. 8 (11th Cir.1995) (noting that Morales called into question the validity of Akins v. … See Cavallaro v. Groose, 908 S.W.2d 138, 136 (Mo.1995) (holding that a change from a three member board to a five member board did not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause).

NLRB v. Transpersonnel Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 8, 2004

NLRB v. … NLRB v. TRANSPERSONNEL, INC. 15 The Board credited Forkey’s testimony.

Board of County Supervisors of the County of Henrico, Virginia v. Insurance Company of North America, a Pennsylvania Corporation

494 F.2d 660 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 9, 1974

Co. v. Lester Bros. … The continued mining *671 without a permit “made proof of [the] actual detriment impossible,” as stated by the Supreme Court in American Surety Co. v.

Terry Belk Dwayne Collins, on Behalf of Themselves and the Class They Represent, William Capacchione, Individually and on Behalf of Christina Capacchione, a Minor Michael P. Grant Richard Easterling Lawrence Gauvreau Karen Bentley Charles Thompson Scott C. Willard v. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education Eric Smith, Superintendent, in His Official Capacity Arthur Griffin, Chairman of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School Board, in His Official Capacity, United States of America North Carolina School Boards Association National School Boards Association, Amici Curiae. William Capacchione, Individually and on Behalf of Christina Capacchione, a Minor Michael P. Grant Richard Easterling Lawrence Gauvreau Karen Bentley Charles Thompson Scott C. Willard, and Terry Belk Dwayne Collins, on Behalf of Themselves and the Class They Represent v. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Boardof Education Eric Smith, Superintendent, in His Official Capacity Arthur Griffin, Chairman of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School Board, in His Official Capacity, United States of America North Carolina School Boards Association National School Boards Association, Amici Curiae. William Capacchione, Individually and on Behalf of Christina Capacchione, a Minor Michael P. Grant Richard Easterling Lawrence Gauvreau Karen Bentley Charles Thompson Scott C. Willard, and Terry Belk Dwayne Collins, on Behalf of Themselves and the Class They Represent v. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education Eric Smith, Superintendent, in His Official Capacity Arthur Griffin, Chairman of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School Board, in His Official Capacity v. United States of America, Amici Curiae. William Capacchione, Individually and on Behalf of Christina Capacchione, a Minor Michael P. Grant Richard Easterling Lawrence Gauvreau Karen Bentley Charles Thompson Scott C. Willard, and Terry Belk Dwayne Collins, on Behalf of Themselves and the Class They Represent v. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Boardof Education Eric Smith, Superintendent, in His Official Capacity Arthur Griffin, Chairman of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School Board, in His Official Capacity, United States of America North Carolina School Boards Association National School Boards Association, Amici Curiae

233 F.3d 232 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 30, 2000

WILLARD, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. … THE CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION; ERIC SMITH, Superintendent, in his official capacity; ARTHUR GRIFFIN, Chairman of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School Board, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellants. v.

Doyle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

102 F.2d 86 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 28, 1939

The findings of fact and opinion of the Board are reported in 37 B. T. A. 323. … As was said by the court in Helvering v. Smith, 2 Cir., 90 F.2d 590 , 592: “The commuted payment merely replaced the future income with cash.” See Escher v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 78 F.2d 815 , affirming B. T.

Robertson v. Jackson

972 F.2d 529 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 20, 1992

See Robertson v. Jackson, 766 F.Supp. 470 (E.D.Va.1991). … Woods v.

CSX Transportation, Inc. v. United Transportation Union

29 F.3d 931 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 21, 1994

Inc. v. … (Huron) v.

A. S. Abell Co. v. Baltimore Typographical Union No. 12

338 F.2d 190 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 4, 1964

The rules announced by the Supreme Court in United Steelworkers of America v. American Manufacturing Co., 363 U.S. 564 , 80 S.Ct. 1343 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1403 (1960), and United Steelworkers of America v. … It is the Board of Arbitration who should make the determination of whether the controversy is subject to arbtration. In support of its position the union cites Independent Soap Workers v.

In re: Capitol Broadcasting Company, Inc.

19 F.4th 385 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 24, 2021

State Conf. of NAACP v. … See United States v.

Tilus v. Holder

317 F. App'x 382 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 17, 2009

PER CURIAM: Dadly Tilus, a native and citizen of Haiti, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider its prior order, which denied Tilus’ motion to remand … We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order, and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. *383 § 1003.2 (a) (2008); Jean v.

United States v. Whitehurst

337 F.2d 765 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 9, 1964

It appears that the Commission and the landowner’s witnesses rejected the Brown-Leeke-Baillio twenty-acre sale at $400 per acre because Brown did not know it would be used as a borrow pit. … E. g., United States v. Miller, 317 U.S. 369, 374-375 , 63 S.Ct. 276 (1943); Olson v.

No. 9112

330 F.2d 164 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 3, 1964

Co. v. Sales Affiliates, 164 F.2d 260 (4 Cir. 1947). In addition, the disclosures of the Brown patent resulted in a great benefit to the hosiery industry. … Keiser v.

Dorothy Burnette v. School Board of City of Virginia Beach, and E. E. Brickell, Superintendent of Schools of the City of Virginia Beach

530 F.2d 124 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 19, 1976

Chandler, by members of the Board; and she answered them. … failure to afford the right to cross-examine before the Board was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

Chuncheng Ren v. USCIS

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 14, 2023

Fishermen’s Dock Coop., Inc. v. Brown, 75 F.3d 164, 168 (4th Cir. 1996). … Co. v. Sava, 724 F.

Kemp v. Newport News Shipbuilding And Dry Dock Company

805 F.2d 1152 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 26, 1986

Sec. 928 (a). 1 The Benefits Review Board has interpreted the statute to limit an employer's liability to fees incurred after the employer receives notice of the claim and disputes it. See Baker v. … Todd Shipyards Corp., 12 BRBS 309 (1980); Jones v.

McElroy Coal Co. v. Trader

578 F. App'x 233 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 11, 2014

Our review of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. … Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. McElroy Coal Co. v. Trader, No. 12-0658-BLA (B.R.B. Sept. 24, 2013).

Jeffra v. United States

169 F.2d 218 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 7, 1948

See Cataneo and Magliano v. United States, 4 Cir., 167 F.2d 820 . Harry I. Jeffra and Nathan E. … Because the Board believed that Jeffra was a full time employee and would so continue in the future, the Board granted him deferment.

David Daada Gonahasa v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

181 F.3d 538 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 14, 1999

The Board of Immigration State Department report, the Board found that conditions in Uganda had changed to such an extent that Gonahasa no longer had a well-founded fear of future persecution. … Bucur v.