Case law

United States v. Garland Arnoldt, United States of America v. Garland Arnoldt, A/K/A Shagg

947 F.2d 1120 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 11, 1991

The Court observed that the lesser included offense doctrine is associated with Brown v. … v.

Joseph M. Kowaleviocz, Local 333 of the International Longshoremen's Association, an Unincorporated Association Edward Howell, and Garris S. McFadden

942 F.2d 285 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 14, 1991

Keeffe Bros. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 592, 562 F.2d 298, 303 (4th Cir.1977) (citing Simmons v. … Eisman v. Baltimore Regional Joint Board of Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 352 F.Supp. 429, 435 (D.Md.1972). 3 .

Fleetwood v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.

776 F.2d 1225 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 5, 1985

The Board said that “change in condition” means “alteration of the physical condition of the employee caused by the accident.” Rizzi v. Four Boro Contracting Corp., 1 Ben.Rev.Bd. … See Haughton Elevator Co. v. Lewis, 572 F.2d 447, 451 (4th Cir.1978) (J. Russell dissenting); see also Trans-State Dredging v. Benefits Review Board, 731 F.2d 199 (4th Cir.1984) (J. Sprouse, dissenting).

Virginian Ry. Co. v. System Federation No. 40 of Railway Employees' Department of American Federation of Labor

131 F.2d 840 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 12, 1942

System Federation No. 40 v. Virginian Railway Co., D.C., 11 F.Supp. 621, 623 . These findings were affirmed by our Court in Virginian Railway Co. v. … Justice Reed in Gray v. Powell, 314 U.S. 402, 411-413 , 62 S.Ct. 326 , 86 L.Ed. 301 . (2) System Federation as Proper Party Plaintiff.

Richardson v. Superintendent of Piedmont Regional Jail

584 F. App'x 57 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 26, 2014

Richardson v. Superintendent of Piedmont Reg’l Jail, No. 3:13-cv-00249-REP, 2014 WL 31433 (E.D.Va. Jan. 3, 2014 & Mar. 5, 2014).

Jimmy Edwards v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

983 F.3d 112 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 15, 2020

The first is Matternes v. … The Surface Transportation Board agrees. See, e.g., In re Tubbs.

In Re June L. Rountree, Debtor. Pamela C. Nunnery, and Keith Nunnery v. June L. Rountree

478 F.3d 215 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 27, 2007

Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 138 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). The Supreme Court has provided some guidance for our analysis of the specific question in this case. … Brown, 442 U.S. at 138-39 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 . The Court has held that a bankruptcy court should use a preponderance of the evidence standard to determine fraud in exception cases. Grogan v.

Franklin Peanut Co. v. Commissioner

144 F.2d 979 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 26, 1944

Commissioner, 320 U.S. 489 , 64 S.Ct. 239 , we are required to accept “without interference” findings of a Board which have support in the evidence. As was said in Standard Knitting Mills, Inc., v. … Finck Cigar Co. v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 134 F.2d 261 , certiorari denied 320 U.S. 736 , 64 S.Ct. 35 ; I. L. Walker Tobacco Co. v. Commissioner, 6 *982 Cir., 129 F.2d 464 ; Colonial Milling Co. v.

Praman Chiravacharadhikul A.K.A. Praman Chiravacharadhijul v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

645 F.2d 248 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 3, 1981

ALBERT V. … We stated in Baur v.

United States ex rel. Greenwood v. Resor

439 F.2d 1249 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 12, 1971

Brooks v. Clifford, 409 F.2d 700, 706 (4th Cir. 1969). Therefore, we give no weight to the recommendations of either officer and we disregard whatever weight they were given by the Review Board. . … v.

Joseph L. Sonnier v. United States

314 F.2d 69 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 27, 1963

To the same effect is United States v. Brown, 4 Cir., 284 F.2d 89 , also decided by this court. … While this apparently is true of United States v. Brown, supra, it seems not to be true in the case of Davis v. United States, supra.

United States v. Harold William Dyer, Jr.

390 F.2d 611 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 1, 1968

It is Dyer’s contention on this appeal, that the Board deprived him of his procedural rights by refusing to permit an appeal of his classification to the Draft Appeal Board. … The right of any registrant to a review of his draft classification by a Draft Appeal Board is absolute, United States v.

Katherin Mejia-Velasquez v. Merrick Garland

26 F.4th 193 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 15, 2022

See Drobny v. … Lizama v.

Holmes v. Bevilacqua

794 F.2d 142 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 17, 1986

The Supreme Court explained in International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. … Postal Service Board of Governors v.

Christine Gibbons v. Betty Gibbs

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 19, 2024

Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21, 25 (1991). … The board members rely mainly on Martin v. Wood, 772 F.3d 192 (4th Cir. 2014).

Helvering v. Security Savings & Commercial Bank

72 F.2d 874 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 2, 1934

MacQueen Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 67 F.(2d) 857 ; Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Motter, supra; Tulsa Tribune Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 58 F.(2d) 937 ; West Texas Refining & Development Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. … The decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals is, accordingly, reversed.

James Arthur Brown v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections

989 F.2d 491 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 9, 1993

James Arthur BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-6836. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. … Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. * Brown v. Murray, No. CA-91-773-2 (E.D. Va. July 24, 1992).

Eaton v. Grubbs

329 F.2d 710 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 1, 1964

Board of Managers of the James Walker Memorial Hospital of Wilmington v. City of Wilmington and New Hanover County, 237 N.C. 179 , 74 S.E.2d 749 (1953). … In Burton v.

Virginian Ry. Co. v. SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 40, ETC.

84 F.2d 641 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 18, 1936

Co. v. United States Railroad Labor Board, 261 U.S. 72, 84, 85 , 43 S.Ct. 278, 283 , 67 L.Ed. 536 ; Pennsylvania, etc., Federation v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 267 U.S. 203 , 45 S.Ct. 307 , 69 L.Ed. 574 ; Malone v. … In the later case of Railroad Retirement Board v.

United States v. Lyle B. Snider, United States of America v. Lyle B. Snider, and Sue T. Snider

502 F.2d 645 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 19, 1974

It has thus been said that the rule was “reserved ‘for exceptional circumstances,’ Brown v. … Brown v. Unitted States, 356 U.S. 148, 153 , 78 S.Ct. 622 , 2 L.Ed.2d 589 (1958).