Case law

Southern Ry. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

74 F.2d 887 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 8, 1935

And in the Kansas City Southern Case the Board sáid: “We have held in Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis v. Commissioner, supra, and in Norfolk Southern Railroad Co. v. Commissioner, 22 B. T. … The decision of the Board is in accord with the decisions of the courts. Helvering v. G., M. & N. R. Co. (App. D. C.) 71 F.(2d) 953, 954 ; Helvering v. St. Louis S. W. Ry. Co. (C. C. A. 8th) 66 F.(2d) 633 (and see St.

United States v. Clyde Gene Ramey

503 F.2d 705 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 1, 1974

United States v. Chudy, 474 F.2d 1069 (9th Cir. 1973); United States v. Burton, supra; United States v. Ebey, 424 F.2d 376 (10th Cir. 1970). See also Ward v. … United States v. Ebey, supra. “A registrant is not required to . report to the board every move that he makes.” Id. at 377 of 424 F.2d; United States v. Chudy, supra.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Watergate at Landmark Condominium

24 F.3d 635 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 24, 1994

E.g., Medina-Munoz v. R.J. … E.g., Precision Piping & Instruments, Inc. v.

Tucker v. Waddell

83 F.3d 688 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 20, 1996

TUCKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. W. … v.

Starr v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

82 F.2d 964 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 6, 1936

Helvering v. Minnesota Tea Co., 56 S.Ct. 269 , 80 L.Ed. —; John A. Nelson Co. v. Helvering, 56 S.Ct. 273 , 80 L.Ed. —; Helvering v. Watts, 56 S.Ct. 275 , 80 L.Ed. —; G. & K. Mfg. Co. v. … The only authority cited by the board for its action was its own decision in Gregory v. Commissioner, Helvering, 27 B.T.A. 223 , but, in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the same case, Gregory v.

Joe E. Parsons v. Norfolk and Western Railway Company, a Corporation

442 F.2d 1075 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 14, 1971

In Walker v. … See also Neal v. System Board of Adjustment, 8 Cir., 348 F.2d 722 ; Beebe v. Union R. Co., 205 Pa.Super. 146 , 208 A.2d 16 ; Caffery v. New York Central R. Co., 24 A.D.2d 1075 , 265 N.Y.S.2d 742 . 5 .

Textile Workers Union of America, CIO v. Arista Mills Co

193 F.2d 529 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 24, 1951

, Amazon Cotton Mill Co. v. … Great Southern Trucking Co. v. N.L.R.B., 4 Cir., 127 F.2d 180 ; Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. v. N.L.R.B., 6 Cir., 186 F.2d 106, 109 ; N.L.R.B. v.

United States v. Jerry Paul Pritchard

413 F.2d 663 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 23, 1969

And he claims errors in the Department’s recommendation to the appeal board made his I-A classification arbitrary and capricious. In Gonzales v. … Judicial review of a draft board’s classification is limited to determining whether it had a basis in fact. *666 Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114, 122 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 (1946).

Cleveland Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Califano

594 F.2d 993 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 30, 1979

The conditions for review by the Board, which form the basis for this appeal, are set out in 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo, as follows: § 1395oo. Provider Reimbursement Review Board-Establishment. … Board to hear the group appeal.

United States v. Donald William Browning

390 F.2d 511 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 6, 1968

Carll, 105 U.S. 611, 613 , 26 L.Ed. 1135 ; United States v. Brown, 348 F.2d 661 (2d Cir. 1965). 2 . Price v. United States, 70 F.2d 467 (4th Cir. 1934); United States v. … United States, 376 F.2d 839 (5th Cir. 1967); United States v. Brown 348 F.2d 661 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 904 , 86 S.Ct. 240 , 15 L.Ed.2d 157 .

E. Leslie Hamm, Jr., an Infant, by E. Leslie Hamm, Sr., His Father and Next Friend v. County School Board of Arlington County, Virginia and Ray E. Reid, Division, Superintendent of Schools, Arlington County, Virginia, County School Board of Arlington County, Virginia and Ray E. Reid, Division, Superintendent of Schools, Arlington County, Virginia v. Ronald Deskins, Michael Gerard Jones, Lance Dwight Newman and Gloria Delores Thompson

263 F.2d 226 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 23, 1959

Leslie Hamm, Sr., his father and next friend, et al., Appellants, v. COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA and Ray E. Reid, Division, Superintendent of Schools, Arlington County, Virginia, Appellees. … COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA and Ray E. Reid, Division, Superintendent of Schools, Arlington County, Virginia, Appellants, v.

Lightsey v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

63 F.2d 254 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 9, 1933

Merchants’ Transfer & Storage Co. v. Burnet (C. C. A.) 49 F.(2d) 56, 58 ; Matern v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 61 F.(2d) 663, 666 . … The calculation of the taxpayer is based upon incomplete records and uncertain memory, and we cannot say that the Board abused its function as a finder of facts (Wright v. Commissioner (C. C.

Trokon Diahn v. Todd Blanche

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 5, 2026

His brief provided the Board with sufficient opportunity to correct any error by the IJ. See Kurfees v. … See Annor, 95 F.4th at 827 (describing the relevant Board precedent). Neither the immigration judge nor the Board did so. That was legal error. See, e.g., Orellana v.

Richard A. Whalen v. The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors William F. Clark, Individually Raymond Eugene Robertson, Individually

781 F.2d 1021 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 8, 1985

City of Richmond v. Atlantic Co., 273 F.2d 902, 916-17 (4 Cir.1960) (quoting Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Yeatts, 122 F.2d 350, 354 (4 Cir.1941)); 11 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure § 2818 (1973). … Neely v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., 386 U.S. 317, 329 , 87 S.Ct. 1072, 1080 , 18 L.Ed.2d 75 (1967) (appellate court, on appeal from denial of j.n.o.v. motion, may grant new trial as alternative to j.n.o.v.).

Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

670 F. App'x 173 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 10, 2016

v. … Brown v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 8:14-cv-04566-TMC (D.S.C. Feb. 16, 2016).

Plasterers' Local Union No. 96 Pension Plan v. Pepper

663 F.3d 210 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 1, 2011

See Allison v. … In Williams v.

Saul Benjamin v. Nicholas Sparks

986 F.3d 332 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 19, 2021

See, e.g., Saudi v. … V.

T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC v. City of Newport News

674 F.3d 380 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 26, 2012

We also upheld the Board’s denial of an application as sup- ported by substantial evidence in AT & T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. Winston-Salem Zoning Board of Adjustment, 172 F.3d 307, 315 (4th Cir. 1999). … Conversely, in Petersburg Cellular Partnership v. Board of Supervisors of Nottoway County, 205 F.3d 688, 696 (4th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we determined that the Board’s denial was not supported by substantial evidence.

Consolidation Coal Company v. James Sanati, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

713 F.2d 480 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 4, 1983

is contrary to our holdings in Sharpless v. … In its decision and order, the Board relied in part upon Stiner v. Bethlehem Mines Corp., 3 Black Lung Rep. 1-487 (1981).

Tradesource, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

17 F. App'x 159 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 28, 2001

 2 TRADESOURCE, INC. v. NLRB NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,  Petitioner, v. … NLRB v.