Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.65s
428 F.2d 811 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 17, 1970
Northcross v. Board of Ed. of Memphis, 397 U.S. 232, 237 , 90 S.Ct. 891, 893 , 25 L.Ed.2d 246 (1970) (Burger, C. J., concurring). … Even so, and even if the board’s default is attributable in part thereto, we think the school board’s position that Booker T.
Cited 1 timesPublishedK.I. v. Durham Public Schools Board
54 F.4th 779 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 5, 2022
In Honig v. … Bowles v.
Cited 28 timesPublished279 F. App'x 240 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 30, 2008
See United States v. Brown, No. 5:98-cr-00120-H-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Jan. 21, 2008; entered Jan. 23, 2008). … Because Brown's motion for reconsideration was filed December 5, 2007, see Houston v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown & Root Inc v. Breckenridge
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 2, 2000
Jordahl v. Democratic Party of Virginia, 122 F.3d 192, 199 (4th Cir. 1997); accord FOCUS v. … Brown & Root relied chiefly on Southland Corp. v. Keating, 465 U.S. 1 (1984), and Perry v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWilson v. Benefits Review Board
748 F.2d 198 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 5, 1984
The issues on this appeal are whether there was substantial evidence to support the AU’s decision and whether the Board reviewed the AU’s decision under the proper standard. Beavan v. … Hampton v. United States Dept. of Labor Benefits Review Board, 678 F.2d 506, 508 (4th Cir.1982). See also Whicker v.
Cited 43 timesPublished5 F. App'x 183 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 2, 2001
Brown plea guilty to possession of a prohibited object (marijuana) in *184 prison. 18 U.S.C. § 1791 (a)(2). Brown was sentenced to eight months imprisonment and three years of supervised release, and fined $2500. … Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b); United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 732 , 113 S.Ct. 1770 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993). The fine imposed was within the proper Guideline range, U.S.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Michael Robert Brown
792 F.2d 466 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 12, 1986
D’Andrea had no explanation for any changes in Brown’s personality. Following all of the evidence, the trial court refused to instruct the jury on Brown’s insanity defense. Brown was subsequently convicted. In Hall v. … United States v. Hartfield, 513 F.2d 254, 260 (9th Cir.1975).
Cited 5 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 6, 1997
the decisions of the System Board of Adjustment to be "final and binding." … Arguing that the collective bargaining agreement required Brown to submit her claim to the grievance procedure and the System Board of Adjustment, TWA filed a motion for summary judgment.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. School District No. 20
328 F.2d 618 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 27, 1964
BROWN, a minor, by J. Arthur Brown, her father and next friend, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 20, CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA Thomas A. … Carrere, Superintendent and members of the School Board, Defendants, and Mark Allen, Barbara Bellows, George Bellows, Julia Jeanne Canfield, Elizabeth S. Stack and William F.
Cited 2 timesPublished243 F. App'x 783 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 25, 2007
Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 , 123 S.Ct. 1029 , 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 , 120 S.Ct. 1595 , 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). … We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing.
Cited 0 timesPublished434 F.2d 408 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 22, 1970
Alexander v. Holmes County Bd. of Ed., 396 U.S. 19 , 90 S.Ct. 29 , 24 L.Ed.2d 19 (1969). In Nesbit v. Statesville City Bd. of Ed., 418 F.2d 1040 (4th Cir. 1969), and Stanley v. … The board, however, may make exceptions for specialized faculty positions. Nesbit v. Statesville City Bd. of Ed., 418 F.2d 1040 , 1042 (4th Cir. 1969).
Cited 3 timesPublished902 F.2d 1134 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 4, 1990
Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Bradley v. Colonial Mental Health & Retardation Servs. Bd., 856 F.2d 703 , 707 (4th Cir.1988). Here, Dr. … Royster v. Board of Trustees, 774 F.2d 618 , 621 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1121 , 106 S.Ct. 1638 , 90 L.Ed.2d 184 (1985). As Dr.
Cited 61 timesPublished762 F.2d 1210 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 24, 1985
The School Board argues that the district court opinions cited in S-l v. … Second, the School Board cannot avoid the holdings of S-l v. Turlington, 635 F.2d 342 (5th Cir.1981), and Kaelin v.
Cited 1 timesPublished213 F. App'x 216 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 22, 2007
We have carefully reviewed *217 the record and Brown’s contentions and find that the sentence imposed by the district court at the bottom of the guideline range was reasonable. See United States v. … Accordingly, we affirm Brown’s sentence.
Cited 0 timesPublished329 F. App'x 475 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 30, 2009
PER CURIAM: Waynely Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) (2006). … Brown asserts on appeal that the district court erred in declining to sentence him below the amended Guidelines range for crack cocaine offenses, contending that a lower sentence would be permitted by Kimbrough v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJames Freeman Brown Co. v. Harris
139 F. 105 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 26, 1905
In Porter v. Sabin, 149 U. S. 479 , 13 Sup. Ct. 1010, 37 L. … Cited Barton v. Barbour, 104 U. S. 126 , 26 L. Ed. 672 ; Texas & Pacific Ry. Company v. Cox, 145 U. S. 593, 601 , 12 Sup. Ct. 905, 36 L. Ed. 829 .
Cited 4 timesPublished325 F. App'x 256 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 29, 2009
Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. … Brown, No. 4:00-cr-00005-H-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Jan. 22, 2009; entered Jan. 23, 2009). See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009).
Cited 0 timesPublished325 F. App'x 256 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 29, 2009
Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. … Brown, No. 4:00-cr-00005-H-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Jan. 22, 2009; entered Jan. 23, 2009). See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009).
Cited 0 timesPublished329 F. App'x 475 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 30, 2009
PER CURIAM: Waynely Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) (2006). … Brown asserts on appeal that the district court erred in declining to sentence him below the amended Guidelines range for crack cocaine offenses, contending that a lower sentence would be permitted by Kimbrough v.
Cited 0 timesPublished325 F. App'x 209 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 12, 2009
See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009); United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir.2009). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons set forth by the district court. United States v. … Brown, No. 1:03-cr-00534-CMH-1 (E.D.Va. Apr. *210 11, 2008).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna