Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca4

10,000+ results

4.34s

  • Cohen v. Laird

    439 F.2d 866 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 19, 1971

    See United States v. Brown, 423 F.2d 751, 754 (3 Cir. 1970). Second, his claim seems based more upon expediency than upon sincerity. … (Emphasis added.) 15 The reviewing board correctly concluded that "[s]incerity is a threshold determination in each conscientious objector case." United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163, 185 , 85 S.Ct. 850 , 13 L.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hinton-Bey v. Johnson

    329 F. App'x 383 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 3, 2009

    Hinton-Bey v. Johnson, No. 2:08-cv-00529-RGD-FBS (E.D.Va. Nov. 17, 2008). Hinton-Bey’s motion for production of documents is denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Lodge No. 514

    248 F.2d 34 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 6, 1958

    Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. Burley, 325 U.S. 711 , 65 S.Ct. 1282 , 89 L.Ed. 1886 ; Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. … Taylor Forge & Pipe Works v. N. L. R. B., 7 Cir., 234 F. 227 . See also, N. L. R. B. v. Truitt Manufacturing Co., 351 U.S. 149 , 76 S.Ct. 753 , 100 L.Ed. 1027 ; N. L. R. B. v.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Rudolph E. Hill v. B.F. Diamond, Trading as Diamond Construction Company, John Gence Hodges v. B. F. Diamond, Trading as Diamond Construction Company

    311 F.2d 789 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 31, 1962

    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company, 253 Minn. 28 , 91 N.W.2d 166 ; Brown v. L. A. Wells Const. Co., 143 Ohio St. 580 , 56 N.E.2d 451 . 2 . Summerlin v. Massman Const. Co., 4 Cir., 199 F.2d 715 . 3 . Gianfala v. … Bethlehem-Fairfield Shipyard, Inc., 4 Cir., 132 F.2d 634 ; In re United States Air Force Texas Tower, No. 4, S.D.N.Y., 203 F.Supp. 215 ; Gonzales v. United States Shipping Board, E. F.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Patricia Mitchell-Tracey v. United General Title Insurance

    442 F. App'x 2 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 2, 2011

    BROWN; FRANCINE C. BYRD- BROWN; HELEN KLATSKY, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. … Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 525 F.3d 370, 376 (4th Cir. 2008).

    Cited 4 timesUnpublished
  • Wade v. Danek Medical

    182 F.3d 281 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 14, 1999

    See Chardon v. Soto, 462 U.S. 650, 660-62 (1983) (applying state rule of equitable tolling during pendency of federal class action); Board of Regents v. … See Burns v. Board of Supervisors, 227 Va. 354, 359 (1984) (emphasis added). 5 Illinois courts do allow intra-jurisdictional equitable tolling, however. See Steinberg v. Chicago Med.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Robert Clifton Johnson v. Stuart Silvers, Dr. Blumberg, Leo Brown

    813 F.2d 401 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 17, 1986

    Robert Clifton JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stuart SILVERS, Dr. Blumberg, Leo Brown, Defendants-Appellees. No. 86-6718. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 23, 1986. Decided Dec. 17, 1986. … Gomez v. Toledo, 446 U.S. 635 (1980); Arebaugh v. Dalton, 730 F.2d 970 (4th Cir.1984)

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Plyler v. Evatt

    902 F.2d 273 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 7, 1990

    Turner v. … See Ustrak v.

    Cited 237 timesPublished
  • Richard Chaty v. Cebridge Acquisition, LLC

    132 F.4th 716 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 27, 2025

    Brown v. Genesis Healthcare Corp., 724 S.E.2d 250, 283 (W. Va. 2011) (Brown I), vacated on other grounds by Marmet Health Care Ctr., Inc. v. Brown, 565 U.S. 530 (2012). … Brown v. Genesis Healthcare Corp., 729 S.E.2d 217, 227 (W. Va. 2012) (Brown II) (internal quotation marks omitted).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • United States v. Lawrence Edward Brown, Jr.

    979 F.2d 849 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 9, 1992

    In United States v. Bruchey, 810 F.2d 456 (4th Cir.1987), this Court required district courts to make such findings before ordering restitution. Bruchey was decided prior to Brown's sentencing. … Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Because Brown states a claim cognizable under § 2255, we construe his motion appropriately

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Moore v. United States

    575 F. App'x 122 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 3, 2014

    Moore v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-00875-JKB (D.Md. Feb. 14, 2014).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States Ex Rel. Nicholson v. Dillard

    102 F.2d 94 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 6, 1939

    Rowe v. … As we pointed out in Jarman v.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Willis v. Town of Trenton NC

    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 15, 2002

    BROWN; DORA MILLER; BAYRON GREEN; LENA BROWN; ERNESTINE BROWN; ANITA B. BROWN; HANNAH C. … See Willis v. Town of Trenton, Nos. CA-96-6-4; CA-99-116-4; CA-01-13-4; CA-01-133-4; CA-01-159-4 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2002).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • McConnell v. Adams

    829 F.2d 1319 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 1, 1987

    In Branti v. … See, e.q., Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479 , 81 S.Ct. 247 , 5 L.Ed.2d 231 (1960).

    Cited 97 timesPublished
  • Wingert v. First Nat. Bank of Hagerstown

    175 F. 739 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 16, 1909

    Is the minority stockholder or the single director who out of 12 directors opposes it, or the judge of the court, or is it the board of directors to whom the management of the affairs of the bank has been committed by (he … Your attention is called to the case of Brown v. Schleier, 118 Fed. 981 [55 C. O.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States of America Ex Rel. Howard Charles Lipsitz v. Major General Gines Perez, Commanding General, Fort Jackson, South Carolina

    372 F.2d 468 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 27, 1967

    The Presidential appea. board considered appellant’s case and appellant was classified 1-A by that board on February 17, 1966. Written notice of such action was received by appellant on March 3, 1966. … United States v. Lawson, 337 F. 2d 800 (3 Cir. 1964); Pate v. United States, 243 F.2d 99, 104 (5 Cir. 1957); United States v. Mekolichick, 234 F.2d 71 (3 Cir. 1956); Martin v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Denrick Eric Brown v. David A. William

    972 F.2d 338 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 3, 1992

    Denrick Eric BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David A. WILLIAM, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-6183. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. … OPINION PER CURIAM: 1 Denrick Eric Brown filed suit under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The magistrate judge assessed a partial filing fee in accordance with Evans v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Cook v. Commercial Casualty Ins.

    160 F.2d 490 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 6, 1947

    The ship with all on board was lost while on the voyage. The insurance contract provides: “Payees. … See Westbury v. Simmons, 57 S.C. 467 , 35 S.E. 764 ; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Brown, 4 Cir., 99 F.2d 199 . Two minor matters should be noted in connection with the instrument relied on as an assignment.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Jesus Ponce-Flores v. Merrick Garland

    80 F.4th 480 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 6, 2023

    Where, as here, the Board “‘adopts and affirms the IJ’s decision and supplements it with its own opinion, we review both decisions.’” Nolasco v. … Id. at 190 (quoting Martinez v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • United States v. Frederick Gaston Brown, Jr.

    708 F. App'x 131 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 11, 2018

    Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). … We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.