Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca4

10,000+ results

1.22s

  • Wellman Industries, Inc. v. The National Labor Relations Board

    490 F.2d 427 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 22, 1974

    While it is true that the cases cited by the Board uphold non-disclosure under exemption 7 only with regard to files assembled after an unfair labor practice complaint was filed by the Board, Clement Bros., Inc. v. … Wellford v. Hardin, 444 F.2d 21 (4th Cir. 1971). Wellman is not without protection from arbitrary action by the Board. See NLRB v. Poinsett Lumber and Mfg. Co., 221 F.2d 121 (4th Cir. 1955); W. T. Grant Co. v.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Ashland Facility Operations, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

    701 F.3d 983 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 14, 2012

    Beard, Attor- ney, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Washing- ton, D.C., for the National Labor Relations Board. ASHLAND FACILITY OPERATIONS v. … Similarly, in Dresser the Labor Board 16 ASHLAND FACILITY OPERATIONS v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • William Brown, AKA Charles Williams, AKA "Fast" v. United States

    547 F.2d 821 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 21, 1977

    However, in United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. American Oil Co.

    114 F.2d 1009 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 18, 1940

    National Labor Relations Board v. Highland Park Mfg. Co., 4 Cir., 110 F.2d 632, 639 ; Hartsell Mills Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 111 F.2d 291, 292 . … to conform to our decision in Hartsell Mills Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Mathieson Alkali Works, Inc.

    114 F.2d 796 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 7, 1940

    As was said in the case of National Labor Relations Board v. … See National Labor Relations Board v. Sands Mfg. Co., supra.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

    407 F.2d 1357 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 17, 1969

    Ass’n v. NLRB, 193 F.2d 782 , 800 (7th Cir. 1951).] … NLRB v. Exchange Parts Co., supra.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Northern Virginia Steel Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

    300 F.2d 168 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 13, 1962

    We, of course, must affirm the findings of the Board if, on the whole record, they are supported by substantial evidence. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. … See Insular Chemical & Rubber Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 128 N.L.R.B. 93 (1960). 2 . The Board’s order with respect to Combs’ status is as follows: “The Trial Examiner found that E. B.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Air Contact Transport Incorporated

    403 F.3d 206 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 11, 2005

    The Board’s legal interpretations of the NLRA are entitled to deference so long as they are “rational and consistent” with the Act. Consol. Diesel Co. v. NLRB, 263 F.3d 345 , 352 (4th Cir.2001) (quoting NLRB v. … In NLRB v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Moss Planing Mill Co.

    224 F.2d 702 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 1, 1955

    In reaching this conclusion, the Board relied heavily upon National Labor Relations Board v. … In National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Webb Furniture Corporation

    366 F.2d 314 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 12, 1966

    We accept the Board’s finding that the union’s concessions of July 1964 were substantial and the Board’s order will be enforced. Enforcement granted. 1 . District 50, United Mine Workers of America. 2 . … In NLRB v. United States Cold Storage Corp., 5 Cir., 203 F.2d 924, 928 , a strike was held sufficient change to break an impasse.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Harris-Woodson Co., Inc

    179 F.2d 720 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 30, 1950

    B. v. Harris-Woodson Co., 4 Cir., 162 F.2d 97, 99 . The facts as found by the Board in that case relating to the refusal to bargain are pertinent here. … B. v. Highland Park Mfg. Co., 4 Cir., 110 F.2d 632, 640 ; Great Southern Trucking Co. v. N.L.R.B., 4 Cir., 139 F.2d 984, 986 .

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Hart Cotton Mills, Inc.

    190 F.2d 964 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 31, 1951

    National Labor Relations Board v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co., 304 U.S. 333, 345 , 58 S.Ct. 904 , 82 L.Ed. 1381 . … Local 232 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 336 U.S. 245 , 69 S.Ct. 516 , 93 L.Ed. 651 ; Berkshire Knitting Mills v. N. L. R.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

    506 F.2d 668 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 4, 1974

    The Board’s determination that the weight of the evidence supported a finding of accretion, of course, cannot be rejected unless arbitrary or capricious. NLRB v. Aerovox Corp., 390 F.2d 653 (4th Cir. 1968). … NLRB v. Savair Manufacturing Co., 414 U.S. 270, 278 , 94 S.Ct. 495, 499 , 38 L.Ed.2d 495 (1973). Order vacated and enforcement denied. 1 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. United Brass Works, Inc.

    287 F.2d 689 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 25, 1961

    It is not the function of a Court of Appeals in Labor Board cases to pass upon the credibility of witnesses. N. L. R. B. v. School-Timer Frocks, Inc., 4 Cir., 1955, 224 F.2d 336 . … B. v.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Ames Baldwin Wyoming Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    73 F.2d 489 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 1, 1934

    “Unless within five days from the date of this decision, the company has notified this Board that it will cooperate with this Board in the holding of an election by its employees who were on the pay roll June 25, 1934, except … The colloquies which took place between the chairman of the Board and the representative of the employer indicated that the employer was willing to consent and co-operate with the Board in the holding of an election in which

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Inter-City Advertising Co.

    154 F.2d 244 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 15, 1946

    National Labor Relations Board v. Highland Park Mfg. Co., 4 Cir., 110 F.2d 632 ; Great Southern Trucking Co. v. … Co. v. Labor Board, 321 U.S. 702 , 64 S.Ct. 817 , 88 L.Ed. 1020 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Bradford Dyeing Ass’n, 310 U.S. 318 , 60 S.Ct. 918 , 84 L.Ed. 12 , 26; and National Labor Relations Board v. P.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Western Electric Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    147 F.2d 519 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 3, 1945

    Pilling & Son Co, 3 Cir, 119 F.2d 32 ; Montgomery Ward & Co. v. *522 N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 115 F.2d 700 ; N.L.R.B. v. Christian Board of Publication, 8 Cir., 113 F.2d 678 . … National Labor Relations Board v. [Pennsylvania] Greyhound Lines, 303 U.S. 261, 270 , 58 S.Ct. 571, 576 , 82 L.Ed. 831 , 115 A.L.R. 307 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Spinning Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    419 F.2d 391 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 18, 1969

    The National Labor Relations Board petitioned for enforcement of its order as entered. … All findings of the Board relating to the employees Pait and Benton were supported by uncon-tradicted testimony, and abundant evidence in the record fully supports the Board’s other findings. ■ Petitions for review denied

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Associated Naval Architects, Inc.

    355 F.2d 788 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 20, 1966

    The inquiry in N.L.R.B. v. … B. v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Norfolk and Western Railway Company v. Transportation Communications International Union

    17 F.3d 696 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 25, 1994

    to determine if Brown Limousine was performing union work, the Board ordered the parties to undertake such a check. … Co. v. Transp. Communications Int’l Union, 780 F.Supp. 364 (E.D.Va.1991). In February 1992, the Board issued its final order.

    Cited 30 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.