Case law

Marcus v. Township of Abington

38 F.3d 1367 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Oct 27, 1994

The federal and state proceedings at issue here clearly are not "parallel" under Colorado River. As a general matter, a § 1983 action may be brought in either a state or federal forum. … First, the federal civil and state criminal actions clearly involve different parties. See, e.g., Baskin v. Bath Tp.

United States v. Queensborough

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Sep 15, 2000

Conner, 930 F.2d 1073, 1076-77 (4th Cir. 1991) (reviewing district court's resolution of whether government breached plea agreement under clearly erroneous standard); United States v. … We believe that the answer to this question is clearly no. . . .

Riley v. Taylor

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jan 17, 2001

Evidence that may be used to impeach may qualify as Brady material. See Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 445 (1995); Bagley , 473 U.S. at 676. … With respect to Nichols, Liguori r emembered clearly that "Mr.

Official Committee v. RF Lafferty & Co Inc

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Oct 9, 2001

("Cogen"), and their qualified independent underwriters, defendant R.F. Lafferty & Co., Inc. ("Lafferty"), and defendant Liss Financial Services, Inc. ("Liss"). … In a qualitative sense, the phrase establishes the estate's rights as no stronger than they were when actually held by the debtor.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

143 F.3d 139 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Apr 30, 1998

Driver's, Inc., 101 F.3d 1107, 1110 (6th Cir.1996) ("This subpart is written in the disjunctive: any one of the alternatives may qualify as the definition of 'single site.' "). … According to B & W, North Star establishes that the regular daily rate is the pay for each actual working day only for hourly employees.

Simon Pirela v. Comm of PA Dept of Corr

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Sep 21, 2017

Pirela confirmed that he understood clearly everything that was said and did not have any additional questions. Pirela’s attorney then asked, “Knowing all of this, Mr. … I believe this fact is established by the trial judge’s own statement, “He’s not subject to the death penalty as long as he has me for a Judge.”