Case law

Karedes v. The Ackerley Group, Inc.

423 F.3d 107 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 9, 2005

KAREDES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Amant v.

Njoo v. Mukasey

264 F. App'x 33 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 11, 2008

In Mufied v. … See Cao He Lin v. U.S.

Meadows v. Kuhlmann

812 F.2d 72 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 20, 1987

In *76 Gilbert v. … Robinson v.

LEHIGH & HUDSON RIVER RAILWAY COMPANY v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

38 F.2d 1015 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 10, 1930

The Supreme Court has now decided the case of Lucas, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. American Code Co., Inc., 50 S. Ct. 202 , 74 L. Ed., and reversed our ruling. … As the result, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed in toto.

Flynn v. Anthony Mion & Son, Inc.

112 F. App'x 101 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 12, 2004

Having reviewed the district court’s decisions to grant summary judgment de novo, see Brown v. C. … See Conn. v.

Piercy v. Federal Reserve Bank

144 F. App'x 897 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 25, 2005

O’Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709, 725-26 , 107 S.Ct. 1492 , 94 L.Ed.2d 714 (1987); Cerrone v. Brown, 246 F.3d 194, 200 (2d Cir.2001). … Codd v. Velger, 429 U.S. 624, 628 , 97 S.Ct. 882 , 51 L.Ed.2d 92 (1977). Appellants have no claim under Miranda v.

United States v. Alvarez

29 F. App'x 659 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 5, 2002

See, e.g., United States v. Lawal, 17 F.3d 560, 562 (2d Cir.1994). … United States v. Adeniyi, 912 F.2d 615, 619 (2d Cir.1990).

Malone v. County Of Suffolk

968 F.2d 1480 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 15, 1992

However, the Board made these appointments without consulting the civil service list of eligibles as required under New York law. … In the case of Sylvia Lake Co. v.

Bogonis v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service

147 F. App'x 216 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 31, 2005

See also Malvoisin v. INS, 268 F.3d 74, 75-76 (2d Cir.2001). The BIA issued its final order on October 30, 2002, when it affirmed the IJ’s opinion and ordered Bogonis to depart the country voluntarily. … For the reasons set forth above, the petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals is hereby DISMISSED.

Ambase Corporation v. City Investing Company Liquidating Trust

326 F.3d 63 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 3, 2003

of Directors created a conflict of interest that prevented the Board from acting sooner. … See Loving v.

United States v. Jackson

256 F.2d 7 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 9, 1958

Brown v. Allen, 1953, 344 U.S. 443, 503 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 ; United States ex rel. Caminito v. Murphy, 2 Cir., 1955, 222 F.2d 698 , certiorari denied 350 U.S. 896 , 76 S.Ct. 155 , 100 L.Ed. 788 . … Watts v.

Blackrock Financial Management Inc. v. Segregated Account of AMBAC Assurance Corp.

673 F.3d 169 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 27, 2012

FREY, Mayer Brown LLP, New York, NY (Matthew D. Ingber, Christopher J. Houpt, Mayer Brown LLP, New York, NY, Charles A. Rothfeld, Brian J. Wong, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, Hector Gonzalez, James M. … Co. v.

Capital Management Select Fund Ltd. v. Bennett

670 F.3d 194 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 10, 2012

S.E.C. v. … See Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, supra, at 45.

American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Black Diamond Steamship Corp.

250 F.2d 777 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 29, 1957

In the case of Consumers Import Company v. … The quoted language is from Coryell v. Phipps, 317 U.S. 406, 410 , 63 S.Ct. 291, 293 , 87 L.Ed. 363 .

Mrelashvili v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service

123 F. App'x 40 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 7, 2005

See Zhang v. INS, 386 F.3d 66, 73 (2d Cir.2004); Secaida-Rosales v. INS, 331 F.3d 297, 306-07 (2d Cir.2003). … For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals is hereby AFFIRMED and the petition for review is DENIED.

Xia Huang v. Eric Holder

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 12, 2010

08-5785-ag Xia Huang v. … . § 1158(b)(1)(A); INS v.

Young Qiu Liang v. Holder

478 F. App'x 678 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 17, 2012

10-5121-ag Liang v. … at the former hearing.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1); 19 see Norani v.

Shattuck, Meredity D. Shattuck, Ulo Vahtra and International Business MacHines Corporation v. Hoegl

555 F.2d 1118 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 20, 1977

See Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. … An order by the Board granting or denying a motion under this paragraph shall not be subject to review prior to a decision awarding priority.

De Johnson v. Holder

564 F.3d 95 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 15, 2009

See Walcott v. Chertoff, 517 F.3d 149, 151 (2d Cir.2008). … In INS v. St.

Carroll v. Somervell

116 F.2d 918 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 13, 1941

Lutz, 299 U.S. 300 , 57 S.Ct. 215 , 81 L.Ed. 251 ; Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. Pollak, D.C., 272 F. 137 . … Hague v. C. I. O., 307 U.S. 496, 529 , 59 S.Ct. 954 , 83 L.Ed. 1423 ; Barry v. Mercein, 5 How. 103 , 12 L.Ed. 70 ; Kurtz v. Moffitt, 115 U.S. 487 , 6 S.Ct. 148 , 29 L.Ed. 458 .