Case law

New York & Cuba Mail Steamship Co. v. Express

52 F. 890 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 4, 1892

Cooper v. The Saratoga, 40 Fed. Rep. 509; The Thomas Melville, 37 Fed. Rep. 271; The Francis T. Nicholls, 44 Fed. Rep. 302. … The earliest reported decision in this country in which these questions were considered is Sproul v. Hemmingway, 14 Pick. 1 .

Ahmad v. Mukasey

270 F. App'x 50 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 19, 2008

*51 SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Ashfaq Ahmad, pro se, seeks judicial review of a March 6, 2007 order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). … Omar v. Mukasey, 517 F.3d 647, 650 (2d Cir.2008).

Esso Standard Oil S. A. v. S. S. Gasbras Sul

387 F.2d 573 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 29, 1967

On June 16th Captain Jensen boarded the vessel before it went to the sea terminal, and he remained on board during the mooring operation. He again discussed mooring and unmooring procedures with Captain Dahle. … Guzman v. Pichirilo, 369 U.S. 698, 702 , 82 S.Ct. 1095 , 8 L.Ed.2d 205 (1961); United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 , 68 S.Ct. 525 , 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948); American President Lines, Ltd. v.

Arroyo v. Senkowski

36 F. App'x 660 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 1, 2002

See Ayala v. Speckard, 131 F.3d 62, 70 (2d Cir.1997) (en banc); United States v. Doe, 63 F.3d 121, 129 (2d Cir.1995). … Brown v. Kuhlmann, 142 F.3d 529, 538 (2d Cir.1998).

Catherine Poignant, Libellant-Appellant v. United States

225 F.2d 595 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 22, 1955

Libellant brought this action to recover for personal injuries sustained while employed as a stewardess on board defendant’s vessel, the S. S. Marine Flasher. … Daniels v. Pacific-Atlantic S. S. Co., D.C.E.D.N.Y., 120 F.Supp. 96 ; Adamowski v. Gulf Oil Corp., 3 Cir., 197 F.2d 523 ; Guerrini v. United States, 2 Cir., 167 F.2d 352 ; Boyce v.

Davis & Co. v. Cohen

369 F.2d 360 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 23, 1966

See Allen v. Grand Central Aircraft Co., supra. 5 In Leedom v. Kyne, supra, however, the National Labor Relations Board's action was in violation of an explicit statutory prohibition, and in McCulloch v. … See also Fay v. Douds, 172 F.2d 720, 721 (2 Cir. 1949) (Board action deprived plaintiff of constitutional right).

Westway Coffee Corporation v. M. v. Netuno, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc. And Appeal of Companhia De Navegacao Maritima Netumar

675 F.2d 30 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 18, 1982

Netumar *32 does not claim to have reweighed the containers when they were then loaded on board the vessel. … Caemint Food, Inc. v. Brasileiro, 647 F.2d 347, 352 (2d Cir. 1981); Vana Trading Co. v. S.S.

College Entrance Book Co. v. Amsco Book Co.

119 F.2d 874 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 19, 1941

The books are also sold generally for the use of students in preparation for college entrance board examinations. … Co. v. Lawyers’ Cooperative Pub. Co., 2 Cir., 79 F. 756 , 35 L.R.A. 400 ; see Lawrence v. Dana, Fed.Cas. No. 8,136. There is nothing to the contrary in Oxford Book Co. v.

Whitehurst v. 1199seiu United Healthcare Workers E.

928 F.3d 201 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 28, 2019

18-2451-cv Whitehurst v. … Hazen v.

Totalplan Corporation of America v. Colborne

14 F.3d 824 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 2, 1994

14 F.3d 824 29 U.S.P.Q.2d 1740 TOTALPLAN CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert B. COLBORNE; Carmen Strong; James Boughton; John T. Brown; Keith Yardley; Wendell A. Lewis; Harry S. … Personius, Brown & Kelly, Buffalo, New York, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant. Richard L.

United States v. Downing

51 F.2d 1030 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 17, 1931

Hyde v. U. S., 225 U. S. 347 , 32 S. Ct. 793 , 56 L. Ed. 1114 , Ann. Cas. 1914A, 614. It is true that that case and its companion, Brown v. Elliott, 225 U. S. 392 , 32 S. Ct. 812 , 56 L. … Clune v. U. S., 159 U. S. 590, 593 , 16 S. Ct. 125 , 46 L. Ed. 269 ; Metropolitan R. R. Co. v. Columbia, 195 U. S. 322, 330, 332 , 25 S. Ct. 28 , 49 L. Ed. 219 ; Reilly v. Beekman, 24 F.(2d) 791 (C. C. A. 2).

Bridgewater Operating Corp. v. Feldstein

346 F.3d 27 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 2, 2003

Feldstein v. Rounick, No. 20970/1998 (N.Y. Sup.Ct. Suffolk County, Jan. 31, 2000). … See Moccio v. New York State Office of Court Admin., 95 F.3d 195, 198 (2d Cir.1996) (citing Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 , 44 S.Ct. 149 , 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923), and District of Columbia Court of Appeals v.

In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation

800 F.2d 14 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 21, 1986

Board of Education v. Nyquist, 590 F.2d 1241 , 1246 (2d Cir.1979); see, e.g., Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 567 F.2d 225 (2d Cir. 1977); Cinema 5, Ltd. v. … Board of Education v. Nyquist, 590 F.2d at 1246.

Plaza Health Laboratories, Inc. v. Perales

878 F.2d 577 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 21, 1989

Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-70 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … See, e.g., Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 577-78 , 92 S.Ct. at 2709-10 ; Goldberg v.

Kaso v. Gonzales

210 F. App'x 136 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 29, 2006

A motion to reconsider asserts that at the time of the Board’s previous decision an error was made.” Ke Zhen Zhao v. U.S. … Cekic v. INS, 435 F.3d 167, 170 (2d Cir.2006).

Franklin Fire Ins. v. Royal Mail Steam Packet Co.

58 F.2d 175 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 9, 1932

All that we said in Grubnan v. … It is nevertheless true that Brown, J. (The Ontario [D. C.] 106 F. 324 ), said that the ship was seaworthy, notwithstanding the failure of a number of rivets in the tank top under no more than usual strains.

Connecticut Fine Wine and Spirits LLC v. Seagull

916 F.3d 160 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 20, 2019

It discussed—but did not resolve—whether, if the New York law were in conflict with § 1, it was nonetheless insulated from attack by the “state action” doctrine of Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943). … Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U. S. 209, 227 (1993)); see also United States v.

United States ex rel. Terraciano v. Montanye

493 F.2d 682 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 14, 1974

Colonnade was followed by United States v. … Contrast Finn’s Liquor Shop, Inc. v.

Elbee Chocolate Co. v. United States

64 F.2d 117 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 3, 1933

Swift & Co. v. U. S., 38 F.(2d) 365, 375, 376 (Ct. Cl.); Sweets Co. of America v. Com’r., 40 F.(2d) 436, 438 (C. C. A. 2); Fire Companies Bldg. Co. v. Commissioner, 54 F.(2d) 488 (C. C. A. 2). … The decision of the Board in Appeal of Caughey-Jossman, supra, 8 B. T. A. 201, was handed down on September 27, 1927, over six months before the Commissioner rejected the claim in April, 1928.

Federal Ins. v. United States

60 F.2d 46 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 11, 1932

See Mittlacher v. United Am. Lines, 233 Ill. App. 411 . With this construction we cannot agree. … Relying upon Holmes v. North German Lloyd S. S. Co., 184 N. Y. 289 , 77 N. E. 21 , 5 L. R. A. (N.