Case law

Knaust v. The City Of Kingston

157 F.3d 86 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 4, 1998

As Lewis v. … As Murphy v.

Gould v. Winstar Communications, Inc.

692 F.3d 148 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 19, 2012

In March 1999 at least one member of Winstar’s board of directors openly urged during a board meeting that the GT partner overseeing the audit of Winstar be removed from the Winstar account. … Id.; see also SEC v.

United States v. Abraham Ceballos and Efrain Adames

812 F.2d 42 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 13, 1987

Dunaway v. New York, supra, 442 U.S. at 217 , 99 S.Ct. at 2259 (quoting Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 602 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2261 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975)). … Brown v. Illinois, supra, 422 U.S. at 604 , 95 S.Ct. at 2262 .

Federated Conservationists of Westchester County, Inc. v. City of Yonkers

26 F. App'x 84 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 22, 2002

Act No. 64-1997, Westchester County Board of Legislators. … Yonkers Racing Corp. v. City of Yonkers, 858 F.2d 855, 865 (2d Cir.1988).

Clyde Commercial S. S. Co. v. West India S. S. Co.

169 F. 275 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 16, 1909

Reed v. United States, 78 U. S. 591 , 20 L. Ed. 220 ; United States v. Shea, 152 U. S. 178 , 14 Sup. Ct. 519, 38 L. Ed. 403 . … The case is not at all like that of Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. American Trading Co., 195 U. S. 439 , 25 Sup. Ct. 84, 49 L.

Association Of American Medical Colleges v. Mario Cuomo

913 F.2d 55 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 14, 1990

Black, Individually, and as Chancellor, Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, Willard A. … See Baylis v.

Garnet L. King. v. Laura H. Hildebrandt

331 F.2d 476 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 1, 1964

Brown v. Shimabukuro, 73 App.D.C. 194 , 118 F.2d 17 (1941); Young v. Young, 57 App.D.C. 157 , 18 F.2d 807 (1941). The appellee’s statements in the affidavit were undoubtedly relevant to the lunacy hearing. … Babcock v. Jackson, 12 N.Y.2d 473 , 240 N.Y.S.2d 743 , 191 N.E.2d 279 . Cf. Auten v. Auten, 308 N.Y. 155 , 124 N.E.2d 99 , 50 A.L.R.2d 246 (1954). 2 .

Victoria Sales Corp. v. Emery Air Freight, Inc.

917 F.2d 705 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 22, 1990

This phrase is defined in section 2 of Article 18 as “the period during which the baggage or goods are in charge of the carrier, whether in an airport or on board an aircraft.” … See, e.g., Royal Ins. v. Amerford Air Cargo, 654 F.Supp. 679, 681-83 (S.D.N.Y.1987); Magnus Electronics, Inc. v. Royal Bank of Canada, 611 F.Supp. 436, 439-40 (N.D.Ill.1985).

Davis v. Seneca Falls Mfg. Co.

17 F.2d 546 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 7, 1927

Perry v. VanNorden Trust Co., 118 App. Div. 288 , 103 N. Y. S. 543; Rockey River Development Co. v. German American Brewing Co., 193 App. Div. 197 , 184 N. Y. S. 155. Mrs. … Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co., 254 U. S. 590 , 41 S. Ct. 209 , 65 L. Ed. *549 425; Corsicana Natl. Bank v. Johnson, 251 U. S. 68 , 40 S. Ct. 82 , 64 L. Ed. 141 .

Simms Oil Co. v. Commissioner

74 F.2d 561 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 21, 1935

Simms v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue before the Board should be treated as in this case. While the right to object to any portion of it was reserved to both parties, that right was not exercised. … See Woolford Realty Co. v. Rose, 286 U. S. 319 , 52 S. Ct. 568 , 76 L. Ed. 1128 , decided in 1932.

Between Globe Seaways, Inc. v. Globe Seaways, Inc.

451 F.2d 1159 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 15, 1971

In 1960 this court upheld a Board finding that MEBA was a labor organization. National Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass’n v. NLRB, 274 F.2d 167, 175 (2d Cir. 1960). … On the other hand, the Supreme Court later accepted as conclusive a Board ruling that MEBA was not a labor organization within the meaning of the Act since it represented only supervisors. Hanna Mining Co. v.

United States v. Merck & Co.

136 F. 817 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 12, 1905

The sole question is whether it is a “medicinal preparation,” as found by the board, and therefore subject to duty under the provisions of paragraph 67 of the act of 1897 (Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule A, 30 Stat … The Supreme Court of the United States, in Fink v. United States, 170 U. S. 584, 586 , 18 Sup. Ct. 770, 42 L.

Cha'O Li Chi v. Murff

250 F.2d 854 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 31, 1957

Dolenz v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 206 F.2d 392 . … T. 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009 (b); Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro, 349 U.S. 48 , 75 S.Ct. 591 , 99 L.Ed. 868 .

Khader v. Gonzales

125 F. App'x 351 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 9, 2005

See Mardones v. McElroy, 197 F.3d 619, 624 (2d Cir.1999). … Zhao v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 265 F.3d 83 , 93 (2d Cir.2001) (citations omitted).

Shuqiang Tian v. Bondi

130 F.4th 284 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 5, 2025

22-6053 Shuqiang Tian v. … See, e.g., Vumi v.

Ward v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

159 F.2d 502 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 10, 1947

Oberwinder v. Commissioner, 8 Cir., 147 F.2d 255 ; Hubbell v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 150 F.2d 516 , 161 A.L.R. 764 . … Oberwinder v. Commissioner, supra; Hubbel v. Commissioner, supra. This was the then assignable value of the policy.

Bergman v. Lefkowitz

569 F.2d 705 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 1, 1978

The only decision that gives Bergman even a modicum of support is Judge Winter's opinion for a divided panel in United States v. Brown, 500 F.2d 375 (4 Cir. 1974). … Graham v. Mancusi, 457 F.2d 463, 468 (2 Cir. 1972); United States ex rel. Ellington v.

F. W. Myers & Co. v. United States

147 F. 204 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 22, 1906

The Board of General Appraisers were of opinion that the importations should be classified as sawed lumber. That opinion was mainly influenced By the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of the United States v. … Hartranft v. Wiegmann, 121 U. S. 615 , 7 *206 Sup. Ct. 1240, 30 L. Ed. 1012 . The importations in question have a distinctive name, a distinctive character, and a distinctive use.

Securities Industry Association v. Robert L. Clarke and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency v. Security Pacific National Bank, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant

885 F.2d 1034 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 8, 1989

See Securities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Governors, 468 U.S. 137, 144-48 , 104 S.Ct. 2979, 2983-85 , 82 L.Ed.2d 107 (1984) (Bankers Trust I ); Investment Co. Inst. v. … Securities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Governors, 468 U.S. 207 , 217 & n. 16, 104 S.Ct. 3003 , 3009 & n. 16, 82 L.Ed.2d 158 (1984) (Schwab ); Board of Governors v. Investment Co.

The Konigin Luise

185 F. 478 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 9, 1911

He found for the libelant on the decision of this court in Doherr v. Houston, 128 Fed. 594 , 64 C. C. … That clause prevails over tbe one referring to “leakage and breakage” in the printed form, and makes Doherr v. Houston inapplicable.