Case law

United States v. DeMott

513 F.3d 55 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 15, 2008

United States v. Hirliman, 503 F.3d 212, 216 (2d Cir.2007) (citing United States v. Brown, 470 F.2d 285, 288-89 (2d Cir.1972)). … See United States v.

Cha'O Li Chi v. Murff

250 F.2d 854 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 31, 1957

Dolenz v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 206 F.2d 392 . … T. 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009 (b); Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro, 349 U.S. 48 , 75 S.Ct. 591 , 99 L.Ed. 868 .

Jian Ren Huang v. Gonzales

166 F. App'x 576 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 13, 2006

Latifi v. Gonzales, 430 F.3d 103, 104 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam) (citation omitted). We will affirm the decision so long as it is based on substantial evidence. See Mu Xiang Lin v. DOJ, 432 F.3d 156, 157 (2d Cir.2005). … Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, the judgment of the Board of Immigration Appeals is hereby AFFIRMED.

United States v. Anthony Dilapi and Benjamin Ladmer

651 F.2d 140 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 9, 1981

v. … Brown v. United States, 356 U.S. at 154-55, 78 S.Ct. at 626 , quoting, Fitzpatrick v.

Weisthoff v. American-Hawaiian S. S. Co.

79 F.2d 124 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 22, 1935

See McCrea v. United States, 294 U. S. 23 , 55 S. Ct. 291 , 79 L. Ed. 735 ; Collie v. Fergusson, 281 U. S. 52 , 50 S. Ct. 189 , 74 L. Ed. 696 . … O’Hara v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., 269 U. S. 364 , 46 S. Ct. 157 , 70 L. Ed. 313 .

Knaust v. The City Of Kingston

157 F.3d 86 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 4, 1998

As Lewis v. … As Murphy v.

United States v. Bedell

311 F. App'x 461 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 24, 2009

See, e.g., Richards v. Wisconsin, 520 U.S. 385, 394 , 117 S.Ct. 1416 , 137 L.Ed.2d 615 (1997) United States v. Brown, 52 F.3d 415, 421 (2d Cir.1995). … See, e.g., Brown, 460 U.S. at 739-40 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 (citing United States v. Lee, 274 U.S. 559, 563 , 47 S.Ct. 746 , 71 L.Ed. 1202 (1927)).

Gadsden v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.

140 F.3d 207 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 27, 1998

Gadsden *209 explained that he was stepping on the running board, holding the handhold with his right hand and the mirror brace with his left. … See, e.g., Eaton v. Long Island R.R.

Antonio Joao Conceicao Santos v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney General

436 F.3d 323 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 17, 2006

Petitioner argues that we have jurisdiction to grant his petition because, he asserts, his crime of conviction does not constitute “sexual abuse of a minor” as that term has been interpreted by the Board of Immigration Appeals … See Mugalli v. Ashcroft, 258 F.3d 52, 60 (2d Cir.2001). It is, we concluded, a reasonable interpretation to which we owe Chevron deference. Id.; see also id. at 55 (citing Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def.

United States ex rel. Donham v. Resor

436 F.2d 751 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 6, 1971

Tobias v. … Brooks v.

Ball v. Breed

294 F. 227 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 5, 1923

Co. was organized, and on January 29, 1917, its incorporators duly elected a board of directors of 16 persons. … In Davis v. Las Ovas, 227 U. S. 80 , 33 Sup. Ct. 197, 57 L.

Thomas A. Vincel v. White Motor Corporation and Glenn F. Kommer

521 F.2d 1113 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 11, 1975

Schaffer v. Universal Rundle Corp., 397 F.2d 893, 896 (5th Cir. 1968); Ash v. … Although Kavanaugh v.

United States ex rel. Chestnut v. Criminal Court of New York

442 F.2d 611 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 5, 1971

The Board then draws up the annual grand jury list for the following year. … Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971). .

Haight v. Franklin

125 F.2d 461 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 27, 1942

Collins v. Caldwell, 5 Cir., 29 F.2d 329 ; Karraker v. Ernest, D.C.E.D.Ill, 4 F.2d 404 . … See Brown v. Ellis, D.C.Vt., 103 F. 834, 836 ; Rankin v. Miller, D.C.Del., 207 F. 602, 611 .

Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd. v. William Pryor

425 F.3d 158 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 28, 2005

Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). … As they did below, appellants rely on the Supreme Court's price-parity decisions in Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 476 U.S. 573 , 106 S.Ct. 2080 , 90 L.Ed.2d 552 (1986), and Healy v.

Hartford & N. Y. Transp. Co. v. Plymer

120 F. 624 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 8, 1903

The sale to the government was subsequently confirmed by vote of the board of directors. … National Security Bank v. Cushman, 121 Mass. 490 ; Bank of United States v. Davis, 2 Hill, 451 , 463; Union Bank v. Campbell, 4 Humph. 394 ; Clerks’ Savings Bank v. Thomas, 2 Mo.

Garcia-Gahona v. Mukasey

298 F. App'x 93 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 4, 2008

BIA 437 F.3d 270, 275 (2d Cir. 2006), we will vacate and remand where the record “compellingly suggests” that the Board did not consider probative evidence, see Xiao Ji Chen v. U.S. … Sanusi v. Gonzales, 445 F.3d 193, 201 (2d Cir.2006) (per curiam).

Sabitov v. Mukasey

266 F. App'x 70 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 25, 2008

Yang v. Gonzales, 478 F.3d 133, 141 (2d Cir.2007). We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. See Zhao v. U.S. … In the main, the Sabitovs challenge the IJ’s reliance on the decision of the Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board (CIRB) denying them asylum in Canada based on an adverse credibility finding.

Between Globe Seaways, Inc. v. Globe Seaways, Inc.

451 F.2d 1159 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 15, 1971

In 1960 this court upheld a Board finding that MEBA was a labor organization. National Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass’n v. NLRB, 274 F.2d 167, 175 (2d Cir. 1960). … On the other hand, the Supreme Court later accepted as conclusive a Board ruling that MEBA was not a labor organization within the meaning of the Act since it represented only supervisors. Hanna Mining Co. v.

Dow Jones & Co. v. International Securities Exchange, Inc.

451 F.3d 295 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 16, 2006

Commodity Exchange, Inc., 538 F.Supp. 1063 (S.D.N.Y.1982) (“Comex I”), aff'd, Standard & Poor’s Corp. v. Commodity Exchange, Inc., 683 F.2d 704 (2d Cir.1982) (“Comex II”), and Board of Trade v. … Corp. v.