Case law

Grosso v. Resor

439 F.2d 233 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 15, 1971

On the premise that a proper and timely request was made, petitioner maintains that a medical board should have been convened, and that if the board should determine that he should not have been inducted, he should now be … Nixon v. Secretary of Navy, 422 F.2d 934 (2 Cir. 1970), the petitioner was at least able to assert that but for the breach of the regulation he would have received a discharge or obtained other appropriate relief.

Leigh v. McGuire

613 F.2d 380 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 19, 1979

Tomanio v. Board of Regents, 603 F.2d 255 (2 Cir. 1979); Mizell v. North Broward Hospital District, 427 F.2d 468 (5 Cir. 1970); see Williams v. Walsh, supra, 558 F.2d at 674 . … Winters v. Lavine, 574 F.2d 46 (2 Cir. 1978); Lombard v. Board of Education, 502 F.2d 631 (2 Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 976 (1975). .

Rent Stabilization Association Of The City Of New York v. Dinkins

5 F.3d 591 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 21, 1993

Glaves, as Chairman of the Rent Guidelines Board, Joseph L. … Citing Warth v.

Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,659 in Re Berry Estates, Inc., D/B/A Blueberry Hill Management Corp., Debtor. Berry Estates, Inc. v. State of New York, Hon. Edward Regan, Comptroller of the State of New York, State Capitol v. Berry Estates, Inc.

812 F.2d 67 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 19, 1987

Thomas v. United States, 200 F.2d 686, 689 (1st Cir.1952); Estro Chemical Co. v. Falk, supra, 303 N.Y. at 87 , 100 N.E.2d 146 ; Norms Realty Corp. v. … and Appeals Board ordered that excess rentals be placed in an escrow account and refunds uncollected by tenants be forfeited to the Board, the court held: 5 Converting the refund to the prior tenants into a fine should the

Wetzel v. Orangetown

308 F. App'x 474 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 23, 2009

Fuentes v. Board of Educ. of City of New York, 540 F.3d 145, 148 (2d Cir.2008) (citing Connecticut v. Physicians Health Servs. of Conn., Inc., 287 F.3d 110, 114 (2d. Cir.2002)). … See, e.g., Ezekwo v.

8 Fair empl.prac.cas. 293, 8 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9488 George Rios v. Enterprise Association Steamfitters Local 638 of U.A., United Atates of America v. Enterprise Association Steamfitters Local 638 of U.A.

501 F.2d 622 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 24, 1974

Doremus v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 429, 432433 , 72 S.Ct. 394 , 96 L.Ed. 475 (1952). … Chance v. Board of Examiners, 458 F.2d 1167, 1178 (2d Cir. 1972). The criteria established by the district court for selecting A Branch members appear to be both reasonable and objective.

Radeljic v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service

194 F. App'x 13 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 22, 2006

See Paul v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 148, 153 (2d Cir.2006). … or conclusory statements; that is to say, where the Board has acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner.”

Helvering v. Einhorn

100 F.2d 418 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 5, 1938

This appeal involves the same point on which Helvering v. Schoellkopf, 2 Cir., 100 F.2d 415 turned, the opinion in which is handed down herewith. … This the Board found, but the Commissioner denies. The taxpayer urges that the point was not raised below, but this we have no means of knowing from the record, as the Commissioner was appellee before the Board.

Luis Alvaro Ceballos (Y Arboleda) v. Edward J. Shaughnessy, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization at the Port of New York

229 F.2d 592 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 6, 1956

Judge Kaufman followed and elaborated upon the distinction we made in Pedreiro v. … Plaintiff heard nothing further from his Draft Board until his country of citizenship became a belligerent and he was, consequently, no longer entitled to claim exemption as a neutral alien.

Chemical Transporter, Inc. v. M. Turecamo, Inc.

290 F.2d 496 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 29, 1961

CHEMICAL TRANSPORTER and THE Steel Tank Barge CHEMICAL PROGRESS, etc., Libelant-Appellee, v. M. TURECAMO, INC., THE Tug MARIE J. … Henry Du Bois Sons Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 2 Cir., 47 F.2d 172 ; The Perseverance, 2 Cir., 63 F.2d 788 ; The Sanday, 2 Cir., 122 F.2d 325 ; Sternberg Dredging Co. v. Moran Towing & Transp.

Da Bing Audang v. Holder

322 F. App'x 13 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 2, 2009

See Yan Chen v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 268, 271 (2d Cir.2005). We review the BIA’s decision to affirm an IJ’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion and its legal conclusions de novo. See Yuen Jin v. … to reopen or reconsider any case in which a decision has been made by the Board ... must be in the form of a written motion to the Board.”); see also Matter of Patino, 23 I. & N.

George Haug Co., Inc. v. Rolls Royce Motor Cars Inc.

148 F.3d 136 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 24, 1998

Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477, 488 , 97 S.Ct. 690 , 50 L.Ed.2d-701 (1977) (quoting Brown Shoe Co. v. … See, e.g., Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209 , 113 S.Ct. 2578 , 125 L.Ed.2d 168 (1993).

Turpin v. Mailet

591 F.2d 426 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 16, 1979

PER CURIAM: In Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 , 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978), the Supreme Court overruled Monroe v. … State College v.

Alicia Aguilar De Polanco v. U.S. Department of Justice, Attorney General Ashcroft

398 F.3d 199 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 10, 2005

Petitioner Alicia Aguilar de Polanco (“Petitoner” or “Polanco”) seeks review by this court of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA” or “Board”) decision denying her motion to reopen her deportation proceedings. 1 On appeal … See, e.g., Skelly v. INS, 168 F.3d 88, 91 (2d Cir.1999).

Tarek v. Gonzales

161 F. App'x 114 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 29, 2005

See Kaur v. BIA, 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam); Khouzam v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 161, 165 (2d Cir.2004). … See 8 C.F.R. 1003.2(b)(2) (“A motion to reconsider a decision must be filed with the Board within 30 days after the mailing of the Board decision or on or before July 31, 1996, whichever is later.”).

Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District

959 F.2d 381 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 18, 1992

See Ward v. … Vincent, 454 U.S. 263 , 102 S.Ct. 269 , 70 L.Ed.2d 440 (1981) and Board of Educ. of the Westside Community Schs. v.

Enright v. Heckscher

240 F. 863 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 27, 1917

Holcombe v. Trenton White City Co., supra. And in See v. Heppenheimer, 69 N. J. … In Holcombe v.

Wisoff v. City of Schenectady

568 F. App'x 28 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 30, 2014

13-2258-cv Wisoff v. … See Board of County Comm’rs v.

Marjorie Webster Junior College, Inc., a Corporation v. Middle States Association of Colleges and Secondardy Schools, Inc., a Corporation

432 F.2d 650 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 21, 1970

See, e. g., Sugar Institute, Inc., v. United States, 297 U.S. 553 , 56 S.Ct. 629 , 80 L.Ed. 859 (1936); Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, 246 U.S. 231 , 38 S.Ct. 242 , 62 L.Ed. 683 (1918) ; compare Silver v. … Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, 246 U.S. 231, 238 , 38 S.Ct. 242 , 62 L.Ed. 683 (1918). 16 . Eastern R. R. Presidents Conference v.

Hurwitz v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

45 F.2d 780 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 8, 1930

Hurwitz appealed, and the Board affirmed the Commissioner on another ground, not necessary to set forth. … The fact that the Board did not decide the case on this ground, is immaterial. Lewis-Hall Iron Works v. Blair, 57 App. D. C. 364, 23 F.(2d) 972 . Decision affirmed.