Case law

Edwin F. Fernandez v. Michael Chertoff, 1 Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Docket No. 05-0426-Cv

471 F.3d 45 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 5, 2006

Fernandez v. Ridge, 2004 WL 3088664 , at *7. … See, e.g., Pietras v.

United States v. Sturdivant

100 F. App'x 23 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 7, 2004

See United States v. Sturdivant, 244 F.3d 71 (2d Cir.2001). … United States v. Brown, 98 F.3d 690, 693 (2d Cir.1996). See also United States v.

Mitchell v. Fishbein

377 F.3d 157 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 3, 2004

the state and that it had delegated that power to the Board. … Kadish 's discussion of a "`state board [that was] appointed by the state supreme court'" "is instructive" (quoting Thomas v.

DuPont Cellophane Co. v. Waxed Products Co.

85 F.2d 75 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 17, 1936

Co. v. June Mfg. … Co. v. June Mfg. Co., 163 U.S. 169 , 16 S.Ct. 1002 , 41 L.Ed. 118 , Bayer Co. v. United Drug Co. (D.C.) 272 F. 505 , and Ford v.

Baruch v. United States

172 F. 342 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 25, 1909

In Steinhart v. United States (C. C.) 121 Fed. 442 , it was held that the articles, if braids, were bindings also, and therefore dutiable under paragraph 320. … The opinion of the board holding that the articles were braids under paragraph 339 was affirmed without opinion by the Circuit Court.

Ozdemir v. Somerset Medical Center

309 F. App'x 527 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 17, 2009

See Dunphy v. Gregor, 136 N.J. 99, 100 , 642 A.2d 372 (1994) (extending standing in negligent infliction of emotional distress cases to “persons engaged to be married and living together”). … See Ozdemir v. Somerset Medical Center, 3:02-cv1600, 2007 WL 1988731 (N.D.N.Y. July 3, 2007). . The District Court's jurisdiction arose from the parties’ diversity of citizenship. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332 .

Ozdemir v. Somerset Medical Center

309 F. App'x 527 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 17, 2009

See Dunphy v. Gregor, 136 N.J. 99, 100 , 642 A.2d 372 (1994) (extending standing in negligent infliction of emotional distress cases to “persons engaged to be married and living together”). … See Ozdemir v. Somerset Medical Center, 3:02-cv1600, 2007 WL 1988731 (N.D.N.Y. July 3, 2007). . The District Court's jurisdiction arose from the parties’ diversity of citizenship. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332 .

Jordan Haber, Debbie Haber v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company

137 F.3d 691 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 6, 1998

McCormick & Co. v. Empire Ins. Group, 878 F.2d 27, 30 (2d Cir.1989). … Upon appeal, however, the Board reversed the Referee’s findings.

Gove v. Eli Lilly & Co.

394 F. App'x 817 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 4, 2010

Dole Food Co. v. N.C. … See Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36, 40 (2d Cir.1993) (citing Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U.S. 612 , 84 S.Ct. 805 , 11 L.Ed.2d 945 (1964)).

Bano v. Union Carbide Corporation

361 F.3d 696 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 17, 2004

Grijalva, Sherrod Brown, Eni F.H. Faleomavaega, Janice D. Schakowsky, Dennis J. … Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 553 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996) (" Brown Group "); International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v.

Aetna Freight Lines v. Clayton

228 F.2d 384 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 13, 1955

See also United States v. Hutcheson, 312 U.S. 219, 234 , 61 S.Ct. 463 , 85 L.Ed. 788 ; Donnelly Garment Co. v. Dubinsky, 8 Cir., 154 F.2d 38 ; Amazon Cotton Mill Co. v. … Since the states in matters of peaceful stranger picketing may not invade the province of the Board, it is clear that the federal courts have no greater power. Garner v.

Benson v. Brower's Moving & Storage, Inc.

907 F.2d 310 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 28, 1990

On October 11, 1988, eight months after the Funds commenced this action, Local 814 filed an unfair labor practice charge against Brower’s with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “the Board”). … “The ‘contract bar’ doctrine is a prudential concept used by the Board for representational election purposes only.” O’Hare v.

United States v. Deutsch

178 F. 272 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 8, 1910

He followed Bonte v. Seeberger, 31 Fed. 884 , Ringk v. United States, 164 Fed. 1021 , and Hamilton v. United States, 167 Fed. 796 , 93 C. C. A. 186 , rather than United States v. … Hensel, 152 Fed. 578 , which the Board of Appraisers relied on, and which was disapproved in the latter case. While the question is not free from doubt, we have concluded to affirm the judgment.

Dekalu Add Rufu v. United States

20 F.3d 63 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 28, 1994

Soviero v. United States, 967 F.2d 791, 792 (2d Cir.1992). … See Onwubiko v. United States, 969 F.2d 1392, 1397 (2d Cir.1992) (motion pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 41(e) should be treated as civil complaint); Mora v. United States, 955 F.2d 156, 160 (2d Cir.1992).

Alva Cape v. City of New York

405 F.2d 962 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 7, 1969

McGee v. … See, e.g., Head v. New Mexico Bd. of Examiners in Optometry, 374 U.S. 424 , 83 S.Ct. 1759 , 10 L.Ed.2d 983 (1963); Cooley v. Board of Wardens, etc., 53 U.S. (12 How.) 299, 315-321 , 13 L.Ed. 996 (1852)

Phelps v. United States

105 F.2d 904 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 30, 1939

Big Diamond Mills Co. v. United States, 8 Cir., 51 F.2d 721 ; Colorado Milling & Elevator Co. v. Howbert, Collector, 10 Cir., 57 F.2d 769 . … See, also, Brown v. United States, Ct.Cl., 14 F.Supp. 520 ; Loeb v. United States, D.C., 17 F.Supp. 966 ; Morgan v. United States, Ct.Cl., 8 F.Supp. 746 ; Cloister Printing Corp. v. United States, 2 Cir., 100 F.2d 355 .

New York, N. H. & H. R. v. Lincoln

223 F. 896 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 13, 1915

Smith v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Co., 19 N. Y. 127 [ 75 Am. Dec. 305 ]; Hulbert v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 40 N. Y. 145 ; Sexton v. Zett, 44 N. Y. 430 ; Weston v. N. Y. E. R. R. Co., 73 N. Y. 595 ; Hoffman v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. … The porter’s testimony was “that he was a half a car’s length away and running with his board” when the accident occurred.

Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co. v. Herrick

85 F.2d 16 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 13, 1936

Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. … and under the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act, it has an adequate, complete, and exclusive remedy at law on a petition to the proper court for a subpoena, or for the enforcement or review of any order the board

In Re Des Litigation. Deborah Ashley and Andrew Ashley v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals

7 F.3d 20 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 4, 1993

See Brown v. Superior Court (Abbott Laboratories), 44 Cal.3d 1049 , 245 Cal.Rptr. 412 , 751 P.2d 470 (1988). The New York Court of Appeals substantially adopted the Sindell approach. See Hymowitz v. … See Browning-Ferris Industries v. Muszynski, 899 F.2d 151 , 159 (2d Cir.1990). Thus, Boehringer lacks appellate standing, even if the “necessary step” theory might be persuasive in other contexts.

Franks v. Kentucky School for the Deaf

142 F.3d 360 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 24, 1998

Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. … See Lane v.