Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca2

10,000+ results

3.82s

  • Vincent Beltempo v. John T. Hadden, Warden and United States Parole Commission

    815 F.2d 873 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 7, 1987

    National Appeals Board Order, App. at 21. This is a mischaracterization of this court’s decision in United States v. … See Lynch v. United States Parole Commission, 768 F.2d 491, 496-97 (2d Cir.1985).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • United States v. Salvatore Panico

    308 F.2d 125 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 14, 1962

    United States v. Bentvena, 288 F.2d 442 (2 Cir. 1961); United States v. Galante, supra; United States v. DiPietro, 302 F.2d 612 (2 Cir.1962); United States v. Bentvena, 304 F.2d 883 (2 Cir.1962). … On the other hand the very nature of the power to punish for contempt requires that the power be scrupulously circumscribed, Brown v.

    Vacated on other grounds by Panico v. United States, 375 U.S. 29 (1963)Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Gottlieb Contracting, Inc. v. United States

    353 F.2d 777 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 2, 1965

    Thus only factual issues are involved, and Judge Bruchhausen properly held, under the terms of the Disputes Clause, that the decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals was final and conclusive. … See United States v. Hamden Co-Operative Creamery Co., 2 Cir., 1961, 297 F.2d 130, 133-135 ; 41 U.S.C. § 321 . Affirmed. 1 . 28.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Aiguan Jiang v. Gonzales

    132 F. App'x 887 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 24, 2005

    See, e.g., Zhao v. United States Dept. of Justice, 265 F.3d 83 , 93 (2d Cir.2001). … This claim is meritless, given that: (a) the standard of proof for withholding of removal is even higher than the standard for asylum, see Ramsameachire v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nemeroff v. Abelson

    620 F.2d 339 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 17, 1980

    Rich Co. v. United States ex rel. Industrial Lumber Co., supra, 417 U.S. at 129 ; accord, Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078 (2 Cir. 1977); see also Vaughan v. … See Dewitt v.

    Cited 164 timesPublished
  • Zemsky v. City of New York

    821 F.2d 148 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 12, 1987

    We affirm the dismissal of his remaining claims. *150 BACKGROUND Zemsky is a social studies teacher employed by the Board of Education at the Franklin D. Roosevelt High School in Brooklyn. … Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co., 457 U.S. 922, 937 , 102 S.Ct. 2744, 2753 , 73 L.Ed.2d 482 (1982). See also Blum v.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • GLEASON v. McBRIDE

    869 F.2d 688 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 13, 1989

    869 F.2d 688 13 Fed.R.Serv.3d 468 Thomas GLEASON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Publication of notice of the pendency of the lawsuit accompanied by mailed notice to the defendants might have been sufficient, see Mennonite Board of Missions v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Imperial Commodities Corp. v. Grace Line Inc.

    517 F.2d 404 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 20, 1975

    That statute, which required appellee to have three licensed mates on board who shall stand in three watches, was fully complied with. … Clearly, looters had been on board.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Genao

    41 F. App'x 510 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 18, 2002

    See, e.g., United States v. … See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 98 F.3d 690, 692 (2d Cir.1996) (per curiam); United States v. Haynes, 985 F.2d 65, 68 (2d Cir.1993).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • American Cutting Alloys, Inc. v. General Electric Co.

    135 F.2d 502 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 3, 1943

    The Board of Appeals of the Patent Office had decided adversely to the plaintiff an interference declared between the Schwarzkopf application and two claims of patent No. 2,015,536, issued September 24, 1935 to General Electric … Bakelite Corporation v. National Aniline Co., 2 Cir., 83 F.2d 176, 177 ; Hemphill Co. v. Coe, 74 App.D.C. 123 , 121 F.2d 897, 898 ; Arcless Contact Co. v. General Electric Co., 2 Cir., 87 F.2d 340, 342 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Colaianni v. INS

    Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 15, 2007

    05-3384 Colaianni v. … The Board affirmed the IJ’s decision without opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • China Fire Ins. Co. v. Davis

    50 F.2d 389 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 8, 1931

    Moreover, while in that case certain offenses were charged, which conflicted with the statute, adequate relief against these was prescribed by recourse to the Board. … Ed. 664 ), or the propriety of intrastate rates (Board of Railroad Com’rs of North Dakota v. Great North. Ry. Co., 281 U. S. 412 , 50 S. Ct. 391 , 74 L.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • United States v. John Brennan

    183 F.3d 139 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 7, 1999

    Katzman, Mayer, Brown & Platt, New York, N.Y., Of Counsel, David M. Zornow, Lawrence S. Spiegel, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP, New York, NY, Timothy T. … United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Turpin v. Mailet

    591 F.2d 426 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 16, 1979

    PER CURIAM: In Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 , 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978), the Supreme Court overruled Monroe v. … State College v.

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • Agus Hasari Steevenez v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney General

    476 F.3d 114 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 6, 2007

    See Foster v. INS, 376 F.3d 75, 78 (2d Cir.2004). … Gill v. INS, 420 F.3d 82, 86 (2d Cir.2005) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

    Cited 168 timesPublished
  • Luis Alvaro Ceballos (Y Arboleda) v. Edward J. Shaughnessy, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization at the Port of New York

    229 F.2d 592 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 6, 1956

    Judge Kaufman followed and elaborated upon the distinction we made in Pedreiro v. … Plaintiff heard nothing further from his Draft Board until his country of citizenship became a belligerent and he was, consequently, no longer entitled to claim exemption as a neutral alien.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Stern v. General Electric Company

    924 F.2d 472 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 28, 1991

    See FEC v. … See Reeder v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kidney ex rel. Kidney v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc.

    808 F.2d 955 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 5, 1987

    That Court answered the question in the negative, Kidney v. … See Connecticut Performing Arts Foundation, Inc. v. Brown, 801 F.2d 566, 567 (2d Cir.1986).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Mack Moore v. M.P. Howlett, Inc.

    704 F.2d 39 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 24, 1983

    Plaintiff and three other longshoremen were directed to board the barge-crane to handle the four corner lines. … E.g., Lieggi v. Maritime Co. of the Philippines, “M/V Philippine Rizal”, 667 F.2d 324 (2d Cir.1981); Evans v. Transportacion Maritime Mexicana SS “Campeche”, 639 F.2d 848 (2d Cir.1981); Mattivi v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Sun Oil Co. v. Dalzell Towing Co.

    55 F.2d 63 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 11, 1932

    See Ton Eyck v. Director General, 267 F. 974 (C. C. A. 2); The Cutchogue, 10 F.(2d) 671 (C. C. A. 2); Graves v. Davis, 235 N. Y. 315 , 139 N. E. 280 . … See McWilliams Bros. v. Davis, 285 F. 312 (C. C. A. 2); G. Robitzek & Bros. v. Davis, 296 F. 107 (C. C. A. 2); Calzara v. Planet S. S. Corp., 3. 1 F.(2d) 885 (C. C. A. 4).

    Cited 26 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.