Case law

Agus Hasari Steevenez v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney General

476 F.3d 114 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 6, 2007

See Foster v. INS, 376 F.3d 75, 78 (2d Cir.2004). … Gill v. INS, 420 F.3d 82, 86 (2d Cir.2005) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Finkielstain v. Seidel

857 F.2d 893 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 8, 1988

The Maryland state court order appointing MDIF as receiver of First Maryland states that “it is impossible and unwise to return the management of First Maryland to its former board of directors or to a new board, to be managed … Ford Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury, 323 U.S. 459, 464 , 65 S.Ct. 347, 350 , 89 L.Ed. 389 (1945). In Excess and Casualty Reinsurance Association v.

List v. Fashion Park, Inc.

340 F.2d 457 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 4, 1965

Kohler v. … Compare Strong v. Repide, supra; Speed v. Transamerica Corp., supra; Kardon v. National Gypsum Co., supra. Affirmed. .

In re Weideman

327 F. App'x 215 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 4, 2009

STATE OF MICHIGAN Attorney Discipline Board Grievance Administrator, Petitioner/Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v Carl M. … A eonclusory recitation of alleged error is insufficient to trigger this Board’s review. See Grievance Administrator v. Frederick A. Potman, 93-47-GA; 94-157-GA (ADB 1997), citing Mitcham v.

Gao v. Barr

968 F.3d 137 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 28, 2020

18-358 Gao v. … A dissenting Board member thought Gao should have been afforded an opportunity for explanation because the identified discrepancies were not “glaring or dramatic.” Admin. R. at 4; see Ming Shi Xue v.

United States v. Salvatore Panico

308 F.2d 125 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 14, 1962

United States v. Bentvena, 288 F.2d 442 (2 Cir. 1961); United States v. Galante, supra; United States v. DiPietro, 302 F.2d 612 (2 Cir.1962); United States v. Bentvena, 304 F.2d 883 (2 Cir.1962). … On the other hand the very nature of the power to punish for contempt requires that the power be scrupulously circumscribed, Brown v.

R.S. Ex Rel. S.S. v. Board of Education of Hastings-On-Hudson Union Free School District

371 F. App'x 231 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 9, 2010

See Whidbee v. … See Matar v.

Alexander, Ramsay & Kerr, Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins.

104 F.2d 1006 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 19, 1939

Btesh v. Royal Insurance Co., Ltd.,. 2 Cir., 49 F.2d 720 ; King v. Aetna Insurance Co., 2, Cir., 54 F.2d 253 . … There was no evidence that the watchman did not sleep on board at the time when the representation was made. As to stoves, the family which lived on the dredge had two stoves at the time.

Ariza v. The City Of New York

139 F.3d 132 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 9, 1998

See City of New York v. … Beech Aircraft Corp. v.

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,770 United States of America v. Sidney Stein

544 F.2d 96 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 22, 1976

Brown, 479 F.2d 1170, 1172 (2d Cir. 1973). … Earlier, in United States v.

United States v. Marcano (Draper)

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 20, 2009

Madeira v. … See United States v. Brown, 937 F.2d 32, 36 (2d Cir. 1991).3 Only the third element—the subject of the supplement briefing—is at issue in this case.

Solar v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

666 F.2d 28 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 3, 1981

See NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291 (1965); SEC v. Sloan, 436 U.S. 103, 118 (1978). Here, PBGC has renounced its initial interpretation of the statute underlying its decision in this matter. … See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 299-300 (1979); Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367, 380-81 (1969); FHA v. The Darlington, Inc., 358 U.S. 84, 90 (1958).

Mildred A. McLearn v. Cowen & Co. And Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Incorporated

660 F.2d 845 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 28, 1981

In Green v. … In Olegario v.

Kidney ex rel. Kidney v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc.

808 F.2d 955 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 5, 1987

That Court answered the question in the negative, Kidney v. … See Connecticut Performing Arts Foundation, Inc. v. Brown, 801 F.2d 566, 567 (2d Cir.1986).

National Plate & Window Glass Co., Inc. v. United States

254 F.2d 92 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 7, 1958

Taxpayer’s contention that the summons was too broad must fail in the light of Civil Aeronautics Board v. Hermann, 353 U.S. 322 , 77 S.Ct. 804 , 1 L.Ed.2d 852 . … Bolich v. Rubel, supra. Reversed with a direction to deny the motion to quash and to enforce the summons.

United States v. Osama Awadallah

349 F.3d 42 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 7, 2003

United States v. Trzaska, 111 F.3d 1019, 1027 (2d Cir.1997) (citing Brown, 422 U.S. at 603-04 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 ); see also United States v. Oguns, 921 F.2d 442, 447-48 (2d Cir.1990). … ."); Frisbie v. Collins, 342 U.S. 519, 522 , 72 S.Ct. 509 , 96 L.Ed. 541 (1952) (same); Brown v. Doe, 2 F.3d 1236, 1243 (2d Cir.1993).

U.S. Bio-Genics Corp. v. Robert K. Christenberry, Postmaster, New York, N.Y.

278 F.2d 561 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 6, 1960

BIO-GENICS CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert K. CHRISTENBERRY, Postmaster, New York, N.Y., Defendant-Appellee. No. 187, Docket 25780. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued Feb. 5, 1960. … to decide his case, even though either Smith or Brown would concededly do a better job of it than Jones.

Hansen v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.

33 F.2d 94 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 31, 1929

Morgan v. U. S., 14 Wall. 531 , 20 L. Ed. 738 ; New Orleans-Belize Co. v. U. S., 239 U. S. 202 , 36 S. Ct. 76 , 60 L. Ed. 227 . The libelant relies upon U. S. v. Shea, 152 U. S. 178 , 14 S. Ct. 519 , 38 L. … That may have been under its “management and control” (Hastorf v. Long [C. C. A.] 239 F. 852 , and Dailey v. Carroll [C. C.

Joseph Michael Dentico v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

303 F.2d 137 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 9, 1962

Dentico v. Esperdy, 280 F.2d 71 (2 Cir. 1960). Two other points are now urged. … One is that the Board of Immigration Appeals erred in refusing to reopen the deportation hearing on the basis of affidavits relating to his father’s alleged United States citizenship; the evidence was a long way from being

George Latus, Libellant-Appellant v. United States of America, and Todd Shipyards Corp., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellee

277 F.2d 264 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 11, 1960

The fact that in the case at bar the master and some of the other officers were on board to inspect the progress of the work was immaterial. That was also true in West v. … Although we recognize that a shipowner in possession owes the personal duty of reasonable care to all who may lawfully come on board, Kermarec v.