Case law

United States v. Baker

665 F.3d 51 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 12, 2012

United States v. Brown, 629 F.3d 290, 294 (2d 3 Cir. 2011). … Brown, 629 F.3d at 294-95 (quoting United States v. Daye, 571 18 F.3d 225, 229 n.4 (2d Cir. 2009)) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted); see also 19 Johnson v. United States, 130 S.

Cirincione v. Plumbers Local Union No. 200 Pension Fund

404 F. App'x 524 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 15, 2010

09-4963-cv Cirincione v. … Hobson v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 574 F.3d 75, 82 (2d Cir. 2009).

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Portland Const. Co.

71 F.2d 658 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 18, 1934

Bank v. U. S., 164 U. S. 227 , 17 S. Ct. 142 , 41 L. Ed. 412 ; Maryland Casualty Co. v. Board of Water Com’rs, supra, 66 F.(2d) 730, 736 . … The Adams claim was ah for materials, such as nails, paper, roofing, rope, twine, waste, kerosene, machine oil, grease, oakum, paint, and brushes We held m Maryland Casualty Co v. Board °onWat!í Co — slon®rs’ ’ '36?

Royal Card & Paper Co. v. Dresdner Bank

27 F.2d 791 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 20, 1928

See White v. Schweitzer, 221 N. Y. 461, 465 , 117 N. E. 941 ; Georgia Refining Co. v. Augusta Oil Co., 74 Ga. 497 ; Brown v. Nelson, 66 Vt. 660 , 30 A. 94 ; Hensen v. Beebe, 111 Iowa, 534 , 82 N. W. 942 . … See White v. Schweitzer, supra; Williston, Sales, § 483. And this is true, even where the buyer directs that the sale be made for the seller’s account. Brown v. Nelson, supra.

Li Fang Chen v. United States Department of Justice

147 F. App'x 206 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 30, 2005

More than a decade ago, in reviewing a BIA decision to reopen, we cautioned the Board that “cursory, summary or eonclusory statements” of denial would compel us to presume an abuse of discretion. Anderson v. … See Medina v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 628 , 633 n. 3 (2d Cir.2005).

Brian Eatz v. The Dme Unit Of Local Union Number 3 Of The International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio

794 F.2d 29 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 19, 1986

Santos v. District Council, 619 F.2d 963 , 969 (2d Cir.1980). … See Czosek v. O'Mara, 397 U.S. 25, 27 , 90 S.Ct. 770, 772 , 25 L.Ed.2d 21 (1970) (citing Conley v.

United States v. Charles C. Soles

482 F.2d 105 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 12, 1973

Pursuant to United States v. … Despite a dictum in Sugarman v.

Christopher Bibbins v. Stephen Dalsheim, Superintendent of Downstate Correctional Facility

21 F.3d 13 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 11, 1994

Fed.R.Evid. 606(b); Mattox v. … See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(8); Senna v. Patrissi, 5 F.3d 18, 20 (2d Cir.1993). Bibbins attempts to amplify the importance of Ms. Krainak’s disclosure by arguing that the boarded-up shopfronts may take on life at night.

Goldberg v. Carey

601 F.2d 653 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 28, 1979

In Gray Line Motor Tours, Inc. v. … In Dellinger v.

Gao v. Barr

968 F.3d 137 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 28, 2020

18-358 Gao v. … A dissenting Board member thought Gao should have been afforded an opportunity for explanation because the identified discrepancies were not “glaring or dramatic.” Admin. R. at 4; see Ming Shi Xue v.

George Lombard and Lomar, Inc. v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc. ("Bah"), and W. Frank Jones, Individually and as an Employee of Bah

280 F.3d 209 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 6, 2002

BAH was commissioned for the very purpose of affording guidance to the GDB Board; the Board’s decision was consistent with BAH’s recommendations; and even the EDA Administrator, an early NEWCO cheerleader, voted against the … loan in his capacity as a member of the GDB Board after the BAH report was received.

United States v. Albert Lorsch & Co.

158 F. 398 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 8, 1907

The Board of General Appraisers found that the articles are: “Pieces of agate, all similar in form but differing slightly in dimensions, the largest not exceeding one inch in length, onerhalf inch in depth and one-fourth … S. v. Benedict & Warner, 145 Fed. 914 , 76 C. C. A. 446 ), induced the judge who heard the cause below to reach a different conclusion.

Brooklyn Nat. Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

157 F.2d 450 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 2, 1946

Pembroke Realty & Securities Corp. v. Commissioner, supra, 122 F.2d 252 . … It may be asked why the same reasoning did not apply, when in Pembroke Realty & Securities Corp. v. Commissioner, supra, 122 F.2d 252 , we reversed the holding of the Board of Tax Appeals.

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Field

42 F.2d 820 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 7, 1930

The Commissioner charged him with the amount, but the Board held otherwise and the Commissioner appealed. … The Board reversed the Commissioner on the theory that the payment was a “capital expenditure,” part of the cost of a wasting asset.

United States v. Ronald S. Jenkins

490 F.2d 868 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 11, 1973

In response to his request, a Board representative advised him to draft a brief statement *870 summarizing his beliefs, which he did. The Board then denied his request for postponement of 'his induction. … Jenkins failed to report for induction the next day and subsequently returned his completed Form 150 to the Board.

Eduardo Cruz v. Robert Alexander

708 F.2d 31 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 2, 1983

Cruz v. Alexander, 477 F.Supp. 516 (S.D.N.Y.1979). Judge Sweet first considered whether Stone v. … See Communist Party v.

Robert G. Spencer v. Hon. Melvin Laird, Secretary of Defense

442 F.2d 904 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 19, 1971

Nixon v. Secretary of the Navy, 422 F.2d 934, 937 (2d Cir. 1970); Smith v. Resor, 406 F.2d 141, 145-147 (2d Cir. 1969); United States ex rel. Schonbrun v. … The local draft board declined to reopen his classification, relying on 32 C.F.R. § 1625.2 (1971), which provides in relevant part that the classification of a registrant shall not be reopened after the local board has mailed

Burroughs Bldg. Material Co. v. Com'r of Internal Revenue

47 F.2d 178 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 5, 1931

The taxpayer thereupon: sought a redetermination of the deficiency by the Board of Tax Appeals. The Board sustained the Commissioner, and, from its order, the present appeal has been taken. … Co. v.

In Re: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 5, 2014

Barclays Capital, Inc. v. … Co. v.

Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Hicks

9 F.2d 848 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 29, 1925

The Central Trust Co. v. Garvan, 254 U. S. 554 , 41 S. Ct. 214 , 65 L. … See Commercial Trust Co. v. Miller, 262 U. S. 51, 57 , 43 S. Ct. 486 , 67 L. Ed. 858 ; Kahn v. Anderson, 255 UT. S. 1, 41 S. Ct. 224 , 65 L. Ed. 469 .