Case law

Bullock v. Latham

339 F.2d 605 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 23, 1964

Brown Company.” Bullock v. Latham, 306 F.2d 45, 48 (2d Cir. 1962). This task was thoroughly and', competently performed by the District. Court Judge, who ruled against the taxpayers.

United States v. James Miller, A/K/A Frank James Coppola

381 F.2d 529 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 26, 1967

V. … Flynn: Your Honor indicated that the Pardon Board is not a part of the Department of Justice.

Gallione v. Flaherty

70 F.3d 724 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 17, 1995

In Reichelt v. … Darden v.

Xie Jian Chen v. Holder

548 F. App'x 10 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 17, 2013

12-2407 Chen v. … Lin Zhong v. 4 U.S.

Munro v. Huber

109 F.2d 97 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 22, 1940

Van Dyke v. Green Ridge Bank, D.C., 24 F.Supp. 302 ; O’Connor v. Vermont-Peoples National Bank, 109 Vt. 1 , 192 A. 9 . The defendants rely on Schumacher v. Davis, D.C., 1 F.Supp. 959 , and Goess v. … Brown, D.C., 12 F.Supp. 517 . We are of opinion that those cases are not sound. The district judge was right in not adhering to them. Affirmed.

Jackson Leeds v. Jonathan S. Meltz, Anthony Mansfield, Susan Ferraro, Merrick T. Rossein, Unknown John and Jane Does

85 F.3d 51 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 21, 1996

In Mississippi Gay Alliance v. … As the dissent in Mississippi Gay Alliance v. Goudelock, supra, 536 F.2d at 1080-86 , points out such an assertion would be far too sweeping. In Lee v.

United States v. Daniel Ocampo, Theodoro Hernandez, Jose Otero, and Nicholas Munoz-Velasquez

650 F.2d 421 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 2, 1981

In United States v. … See United States v. Mannino, supra; United States v.

Hispanics For Fair And Equitable Reapportionment (H-Fera) v. Griffin

958 F.2d 24 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 27, 1992

Hughes, Clarence Dent and Maxine Hare, Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James D. GRIFFIN, Common Council of the City of Buffalo, City of Buffalo and Board of Elections of Erie County, Defendants-Appellees. … As we said in Herzog & Straus v. GRT Corp., 553 F.2d 789, 792 (2d Cir.1977) (quoting Georgia Southern & Florida Ry. Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R.R.

Gray v. The Town Of Darien

927 F.2d 69 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 1, 1991

The TOWN OF DARIEN, the Board of Selectmen, Board of Finance and other Boards and Commissioners, acting singly or in concert, in whole or in part, together with all officers, employees, agents and attorneys thereof, Defendants-Appellees … Co. v.

Rabbi Yitzchok Leblanc-Sternberg, Chanie Leblanc-Sternberg, Fred Walfish, Lewis Kamman, Park Avenue Synagogue, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Robert Fletcher, Marianne Cucolo, John C. Layne, and Nicholas Vertullo, Individually and in Their Capacity as Trustees of the Village of Airmont, Maureen Kendrick, Individually and in Her Capacity as Mayor of the Village of Airmont, Raymond Kane, Paul Berliner, the Airmont Civic Association, the Village of Airmont, the Town of Ramapo, and Herbert Reisman, Individually and in His Capacity as Ramapo Town Supervisor, Robert Fletcher, John C. Layne, Nicholas Vertullo, Maureen Kendrick, and Raymond Kane, Individually, and in Their Capacity as Trustees of the Village of Airmont, and the Village of Airmont, Robert Fletcher and Nicholas Vertullo, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants. United States of America v. The Village of Airmont, Airmont Civic Association, Ralph Bracco, in His Capacity as Mayor of the Village of Airmont, John C. Layne, Raymond Kane, Charles Calotta and Ronald Sabo, in Their Capacities as Trustees of the Village of Airmont

67 F.3d 412 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 21, 1995

Further, the court acknowledged that "[v]iewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, we can foresee that the Planning Board and the Zoning Board of Appeals ... will not adopt the Ramapo interpretation … Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet, --- U.S. ----, ---- n. 7, 114 S.Ct. 2481 , 2491 n. 7, 129 L.Ed.2d 546 (1994).

Barnes v. Furman

629 F. App'x 52 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 22, 2015

See Pearson v. … See Holland v.

United States v. Spadaro

100 F. App'x 842 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 12, 2004

United States v. Lainez-Leiva, 129 F.3d 89, 93 (2d Cir.1997) (quoting United States v. Brown, 98 F.3d 690, 692 (2d Cir.1996)). … United States v. Brown, 98 F.3d 690, 694 (2d Cir.1996). We can find no evidence in the record to overcome such a presumption.

Gupta v. New York City School Construction Authority

305 F. App'x 687 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 19, 2008

Brown v. Coach Stores, Inc., 163 F.3d 706, 710 (2d Cir.1998). … v.

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,017 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Management Dynamics, Inc., and William N. Levy, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Management Dynamics, Inc., and Samuel D. Hodge

515 F.2d 801 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 18, 1975

SEC v. … C. v.

United States Ex Rel. James Horelick v. The Criminal Court of the City of New York

507 F.2d 37 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 5, 1974

See Rabe v. Washington, 405 U.S. 313 , 92 S.Ct. 993 , 31 L.Ed.2d 358 (1972) (obscenity statute); Bouie v. City of Columbia, 378 U.S. 347 , 84 S.Ct. 1697 , 12 L.Ed.2d 894 (1964) (trespass statute). See also Cole v. … Garner v. Louisiana, 368 U.S. 157, 163 , 82 S.Ct. 248 , 7 L.Ed.2d 207 (1961); Thompson v. City of Louisville, 362 U.S. 199, 206 , 80 S.Ct. 624 , 4 L.Ed.2d 654 (1960); United States ex rel. Terry v.

Commissioner v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.

123 F.2d 819 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 1, 1941

The precise question presented by this appeal was decided by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Commissioner v. Warren Webster Trust No. 1, 122 F.2d 915 , opinion filed October 6, 1941. … For the reasons there stated we think the decision of the Board was correct. Order affirmed.

Cunard S. S. Co. v. United States

285 F. 516 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 24, 1922

Section 9 of that act provided as follows: “Every vessel pm-chased, chartered, or leased from the board shall, unless otherwise authorized by the board, be operated only under such registry or enrollment and license. … The case of Middleton & Co. v. United States, 273 Fed. 199 , decided by Judge Smith in the Eastern district of South Carolina, asserts a contrary doctrine. And so does the case of Smith v.

Grinnell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

70 F.2d 705 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 30, 1934

In Wear v. … The order of the Board of Tax Appeals is reversed.

Adickes v. Leary

436 F.2d 540 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 7, 1971

In October, 1968, the United Federation of Teachers declared an illegal strike against the New York City Board of Education. … Powell v. Workmen's Compensation Board of State of New York, 327 F.2d 131, 137 (2d Cir. 1964). The motion to dismiss the appeal as moot is denied. The judgment dismissing the action is affirmed.

Mountain Lumber Co. v. Davis

11 F.2d 219 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 8, 1926

All of the shipments are charged to have been made from points in Canada to points in New York on through bills of lading and on through rates, contained in tariffs issued by the Canadian carriers and filed with the Board … Co. et al. v. Davis et al., 9 F.(2d) 911 , October term, 1925, in holding that, in the absence of such allegation, no cause of action is stated. Decree affirmed.