Case law

Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers Division 269 v. Long Island Rail Road

85 F.3d 35 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 20, 1996

Brotherhood of Locomotive Eng’rs v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. … In Consolidated Rail Corp. v.

Delaware, L. & W. Ry. Co. v. Tuovinen

240 F. 678 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 13, 1917

It is quite evident that he must have'been injured while trying to board the train, or in getting off it, or in falling from it. [1] His story is that, having been unable to get employment he had boarded one of the defendant … Co. v. Stojanowski, 198 Fed. 77 , 117 C. C.

In re Downing

56 F. 470 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 15, 1893

The board of general appraisers and the circuit court were of the opinion that the importations were dutiable under another provision of the act, as “other paints and colors, not specially provided ■for in this act.” at 25 … The circuit court, in affirming the decision, of the board of general appraisers, referred to the case of Church of Holy Trinity v. U. S., 143 U. S. 457 , 12 Sup. Ct.

United States v. Raymond J. Place

660 F.2d 44 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 8, 1981

On Friday, August 17, 1979, Place entered the Miami International Airport for the purpose of boarding a National Airlines flight to New York’s LaGuardia Airport. … Seizures for “investigatory” purposes have consistently been declared unconstitutional, see, e.g., Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200 , 99 S.Ct. 2248 , 60 L.Ed.2d 824 (1979); Brown v.

Zemsky v. City of New York

821 F.2d 148 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 12, 1987

ZEMSKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, the Board of Education of the City of New York, Victor Vilareal, Alan J. Irgang, John Sisti, Robert J. … Cone Memorial Hospital v.

Omega Importing Corp. v. Petri-Kine Camera Company, Inc.

451 F.2d 1190 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 8, 1971

The West German enterprise opposed, and this matter also went to a Trial and Appeal Board. … Hilton v.

Rosenfeld v. United States

66 F. 303 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 5, 1895

Churchill v. Onderdonk, 59 N. Y. 134, 136 . … Brown v. Volkening, 64 N. Y. 76, 80 . Literally, and giving the words their ordinary meaning, the “actual possession” of the statute is an open, visible, present occupancy and possession of the articles imported.

North American Leisure Corporation v. Duplicators, Ltd.

468 F.2d 695 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 19, 1972

Perlmutter v. … See Jaffke v. Dunham, 352 U.S. 280, 281 , 77 S.Ct. 307 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 314 (1957); Continental Can Co. v. Horton, 250 F.2d 637, 645 (8th Cir. 1957); Cold Metal Process Co. v.

Biao Yang v. Gonzales

496 F.3d 268 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 31, 2007

06-2735-ag, 06-3224-ag Biao Yang v. Gonzales, Ming Liang Lin v. … Mitchell v.

Washington Heights-West Harlem-Inwood Mental Health Council, Inc. v. District 1199, National Union of Hospital & Health Care Employees

748 F.2d 105 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 15, 1984

On January 19, 1983, the Council filed an unfair labor practices charge with the National Labor Relations Board (the Board), charging that the Union had failed to reduce the terms of the negotiated agreement to writing. … Apparently, the district judge felt constrained by our recent decision in Reprosystem, B.V. v.

United States v. Jacques Rene Henri Vermeulen

436 F.2d 72 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 31, 1970

. § 4208 (a) (2), the Court said that any reduction or eligibility for pa *75 role would be “at such time as the Board of Parole may determine.” 8 I. The purpose of Rule 11 (Fed. … Hinds v. United States, 429 F.2d 1322, 1323 (9th Cir. 1970); United States v. Youpee, 419 F.2d 1340, 1344 (9th Cir. 1969); Munich v. United States, 337 F.2d 356, 359 (9th Cir. 1964); cf. McCarthy v.

Dobson v. United States

27 F.2d 807 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 20, 1928

See Axtell v. United States, 286 F. 165 (D. C. N. Y.); Burke v. United States, 15 F.(2d) 573 (D. C. Or.). It must be conceded, therefore, that appellants make a strong argument in favor of liability. … The decision in O’Neal v. United States, 11 F.(2d) 869 (D. C. N. Y.), affirmed (C. C.

International Signal Co. v. Vreeland Apparatus Co.

278 F. 468 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 14, 1921

Stonemetz Co. v. Brown Co. (C. C.) 57 Fed. 601 ; Nathan v. Craig (C. C.) 49 Fed. 370 ; Simplex Ry. Appliance Co. v. Wands, 115 Fed. 517 , 53 C. C. … Stonemetz Co. v. Brown Co., supra; Boston Pneumatic Power Co. v. Eureka Patents Co., supra. [4] Applications for the patents here in controversy were pending in the Patent Office at the same time.

International Railways of Central America v. United Fruit Company

373 F.2d 408 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 27, 1967

In Michelsen v. … In Austrian v.

R. H. MacY & Co., Inc., L. Bamberger & Co., Davison-Paxon Co., and the La Salle & Koch Company v. United States

255 F.2d 884 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 16, 1958

As Judge Littleton said in Kaufmann & Baer Co. v. … Co. v. C. I. R., 8 T.C. 14, 15, 16 . . A method for making the adjustments once the proper indices are determined is illustrated in Hutzler Bros. Co. v. C. I. R., 8 T.C. 14 . See also Basse v. C. I. R., 10 T.C. 328 . .

United States v. Esperdy

280 F.2d 71 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 24, 1960

See Bilokumsky v. … Zaffarano v.

Merritt & Chapman Derrick & Wrecking Co. v. Dailey Towing Line, Inc.

263 F. 78 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 14, 1920

Finally, the appellant relies upon the decision of Judge Addison Brown in MacMillan v. Moran (D. C.) 107_Fed._ 149. _We think it differs in material respects.

Allegaert v. Perot

565 F.2d 246 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 7, 1977

Discussion 9 Our rule, made plain by NCK Organization Ltd. v. Bregman, supra, 542 F.2d at 133-34 ; Hull v. Celanese Corp., supra, 513 F.2d at 571-72 ; and Emle Industries, Inc. v. … Grant Co. v. Haines, 531 F.2d 671, 677-78 (2d Cir. 1976); International Electronics Corp. v.

United States v. Emanuel Lester

328 F.2d 971 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 10, 1964

United States v. Kabot, 295 F.2d 848, 852 (2 Cir. 1961); United States v. … The court declined to reduce the sentence, but at defendant’s request made him eligible to parole under § 4208(a) at the discretion of the Parole Board.

Salvatore Cucurillo v. Schulte, Bruns Schiff Gesellschaft, M.B.H., and Third Party v. Universal Terminal & Stevedoring Corp., Third Party

324 F.2d 234 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 29, 1963

Parker v. Broadcast Music, Inc., 2 Cir., 289 F.2d 318 . See also Link v. Wabash Railroad Company, 370 U.S. 626 , 82 S.Ct. 1386 , 8 L.Ed.2d 734 . We see no abuse of discretion here. … This is made clear by the following quotation from Judge Ryan’s memorandum opinion: “This suit was filed on September 21, 1960 for injuries alleged to have been sustained ¿board the SS Eliza- ‘ beth Schulte on-' February