Case law

Jacobus v. The Scow Triboro No. 22

267 F.2d 547 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 12, 1959

There was no evidence of any general practice in the industry to keep captains on board under the circumstances here disclosed. … As no cross-claim is required to be filed as to matters growing out of the May 30 events, Patterson Oil Terminals, Inc. v.

Novelty Textile Mills, Inc. v. Joan Fabrics Corporation

558 F.2d 1090 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 12, 1977

See Soptra Fabrics Corp. v. *1096 Stafford Knitting Mills, 490 F.2d 1092, 1094 (2d Cir. 1974), and decisions cited therein, including Scarves by Vera v. … In short, what Novelty copyrighted was its plaid design in a brown, beige and white color combination.

Klein & Co. Futures, Inc. v. Bd. of Trade of City of New York

464 F.3d 255 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 18, 2006

See Kolari v. … See Baylis v.

Lianping Li v. Lynch

839 F.3d 144 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 6, 2016

15‐219‐ag     Li v.  … Siewe  v.  Gonzales,  480  F.3d  160,  166–67  (2d  Cir.  2007)  (internal  quotation  marks  omitted);  see  also  Xiao  Ji  Chen  v.  U.S. 

Wolker v. Electric Ferries, Inc.

82 F.2d 1023 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 20, 1936

(C.C.A.) 48 F.(2d) 559 , and Johnson v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation (C.C.A.) 24 F.(2d) 963 .

Klebanow v. New York Produce Exchange

344 F.2d 294 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 2, 1965

Ruzicka v. … But Meyer v.

Decorative Stone Co. v. Building Trades Council of Westchester County

23 F.2d 426 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 9, 1928

Ed. 120 ; Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers, 240 U. S. 251, 259 , 36 S. Ct. 269 , 60 L. Ed. 629 . … Stevens v. Gladding, 17 How. 447, 453 , 15 L. Ed. 155 ; Livingston v. Woodworth, 15 How. 546, 559 , 14 L. Ed. 809 ; Elizabeth v. Pavement Co., 97 U. S. 126, 138 , 24 L. Ed. 1000 . See, also, United States v.

Alva Steamship Co. v. City of New York

616 F.2d 605 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 30, 1980

We relied for our holding on “the closest state precedent,” Weiss v. … Judge Conner did not apply the Weiss v. Fote, supra, standard to the facts in this case.

Rhem v. Malcolm

507 F.2d 333 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 8, 1974

See, e.g., Swann v. Board of Educ., 402 U.S. 1, 28-30 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); Goss v. … Board of Educ., 482 F.2d 1044, 1046 (6th Cir. 1973) (en banc), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1171 , 94 S.Ct. 933 , 39 L.Ed.2d 120 (1974); Medley v.

Cunningham v. Town of Ellicott

310 F. App'x 448 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 18, 2009

Munafo v. Metro. Transp. Auth., 381 F.3d 99 , 105 (2d Cir.2004). Cunningham raises two arguments on appeal. … The Town Board approved Cunningham’s termination on March 15, 2004. Question No. 17 asked the jury to resolve this question.

Greenstein v. National Skirt & Sportswear Ass'n

274 F.2d 430 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 28, 1960

Defendants’ motion to dismiss this appeal raises the question whether Judge *431 Wcinfeld’s refusal to stay arbitration was a mere calendar order, as held in Armstrong-Norwalk Rubber Corp. v. … Joint Board Dress and Waistmakers’ Union of Greater New York, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 176 F.Supp. 176 .

In re the Vessel Marine Sulphur Queen

460 F.2d 89 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 25, 1972

After a thorough inquiry by a Marine Board of Investigation, convened by the Commandant of the United States Coast Guard, into all the circumstances of the ship’s disappearance, it was concluded by the Board and the Commandant … F.I.C. has been subrogated to the claims of the cargo owner, TGS, and thus has exactly the same remedies against MTL which TGS would have had. 3 As Judge Brown said in Isbell Enterprises Inc. v.

Cragin & Co. v. International S. S. Co.

15 F.2d 263 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 8, 1926

.] § 2020; and see, especially, Buckbee v. Brown, 21 Wend. [N. Y.] 110); but, as the suit was in admiralty, Suzuki, as agent for absent owners, could so sue. The Thames, 14 Wall. 98 at 109 , 20 L. … Warner v. Comstock, 55 Mich. 615 , 22 N. W. 64 ; Fogg v. Plumer, 17 N. H. 112; Hayes v. Bickelhoupt (C. C.) 24 F. 806 ; Chapman v. Waterman, 176 App. Div. 697 , 163 N. Y. S. 1059; United States Bank v.

Gulf Refining Co. v. Atlantic Mut. Ins.

27 F.2d 678 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 17, 1928

Lewis v. Rucker, 2 Burr. 1167. This has been generally followed since that time. Johnson v. Shedden, 2 East, 581; Turner v. Edwards, 12 East, 488; Lawrence v. Insurance Co., 3 Johns. Cas. 217 ; Forbes v. Mfrs.’ Ins. … C.) 100 F. 317, 318 , affirmed on Judge Brown’s opinion in 108 F. 987 (C. C. A. 2). The doctrine seems to us to be in accord with sound principle.

American Federation of Railroad Police, Inc. v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

832 F.2d 14 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 28, 1987

Board of Education v. Allen, 392 U.S. 236 , 241 & n. 5, 88 S.Ct. 1923 , 1925 & n. 5, 20 L.Ed.2d 1060 (1968). It has other flaws, however, that made dismissal appropriate. … See, e.g., Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1491 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

The Kathryn B. Guinan

176 F. 301 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 7, 1910

C.) 84 Fed. 719 , where vessels were left with no one on board in open waters and sometimes in the face of approaching storms, or like Campbell v. Pennsylvania, 85 Fed. 462 , 29 C. C. … The reasoning of Rose v. Stephens, etc., Co. (O.

Silva v. Bankers Commercial Corporation

163 F.2d 602 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 30, 1947

Co. v. New York & Baltimore T. Line, 2 Cir., 185 F. *605 386, 389; Minturn v. Maynard, 17 How. 477 , 15 L.Ed. 235 ; Israel v. Moore & McCormack Co., D.C., 295 F. 919 . … Co. v. Garfield, 2 Cir., 10 F. 2d 664, 668, 669 . It is true that Justice Pecora reached a contrary result in Republic Chemical Corporation v.

Delgado Coro v. Bondi

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 21, 2025

24-1636 Delgado Coro v. … UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED.

Darlington v. National Bulk Carriers, Inc.

157 F.2d 817 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 30, 1946

Reversed and remanded. 2 1 Masjulis v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 2 Cir., 31 F.2284; Reskin v. Minnesota-Atlantic Transit Co., 2 Cir., 107 F.2d 743, 745 ; Storgard v. France & Canada S. S. … Carroll Stevedore Co. v.

Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. Ayers

763 F.2d 55 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 15, 1985

Beacon Enterprises, Inc., 715 F.2d at 763 ; Fontanetta v. American *59 Board of Internal Medicine, 421 F.2d 355, 357 (2d Cir.1970); George Reiner & Co. v. Schwartz, 41 N.Y.2d 648, 653-54 , 394 N.Y. … Fontanetta involved a physician who sought to be certified as an internist by the defendant Board. The Board required for certification the successful taking of both a written examination and an oral examination.