Case law

Hastorf v. F. R. Long-W. G. Broadhurst Co.

239 F. 852 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 16, 1917

Monk v. Cornell Steamboat Co., 198 Fed. 472 , 117 C. C. A. 232 . The District Judge thought that our decision in North Atlantic Dredging Co. v. McAllister Steamboat Co., 202 Fed. 181 , 120 C. C. … Hastorf v. Hudson River Co. (D. C.) 110 Fed. 669 , Zabriskie v. City (D.

Santoso v. Holder

580 F.3d 110 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 14, 2009

07-4713-ag Santoso v. … Chen v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 268, 271 (2d Cir. 2005).

Consolidation Coastwise Co. v. Lee Towing Line, Inc.

278 F. 918 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 18, 1922

board at a particular place for the purpose of conducting a ship through a river, road, or channel, or from or into a port.’ ” The Wave v. … Pacific Mail, etc., v. Joliffe, 2 Wall. 461 , 17 I*. Ed. 805.

Stephen J. Dilorenzo v. Wendell H. Murphy, Harry D. Murphy, Joyce Murphy Minchew, Wendell H. Murphy Jr., Wendy Murphy Crumpler, Stratton K. Murphy, Marc D. Murphy, Angela Norman Brown, and Smithfield Foods, Inc., Docket No. 04-5052-Cv

443 F.3d 224 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 28, 2006

Kern County Land Co. v. … See also Booth v.

United States v. Liquid Carbonic Co.

160 F. 455 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 10, 1908

The Board of General Appraisers has found that these importations are practically like those which were before this court in U. S. v. Downing, 105 Fed. 1005 , 44 C. C. A. 686 .

United States v. Alex Elias, Also Known as Puff, Luis Otero, Also Known as Gardana

285 F.3d 183 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 25, 2002

See United States v. … In United States v. Brown, 959 F.2d 63 (6th Cir.1992), the defendant attempted to rob a nightclub that served beer and snack food manufactured out-of-state but purchased from an in-state distributor.

People Of The State Of New York v. Federal Communications Commission

267 F.3d 91 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 28, 2001

Warden, Jr., New York State Consumer Protection Board, Albany, New York, for Intervenor New York State Consumer Protection Board. 2 James H. Bolin, Jr., At&t Corporation, Basking Ridge, New Jersey (Mark C. … See FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 (2000). "Because this case involves [the FCC's] construction of a statute that it administers, our analysis is governed by Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v.

Stanbury v. Mukasey

271 F. App'x 14 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 20, 2008

Ming Xia Chen v. BIA, 435 F.3d 141, 144 (2d Cir.2006). … Kambolli v. Gonzales, 449 F.3d 454, 464-65 (2d Cir.2006) (per curiam).

United States v. Ingredient Technology Corporation, Formerly Known as Sucrest Corporation, and Robert M. Rapaport

698 F.2d 88 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 5, 1983

Here, from the beginning, it was never intended that the sugar which was on board ship would be for SuCrest “an income-producing factor.” … United States v. Herrera, 584 F.2d 1137, 1149 (2d Cir.1978). And of course it is immaterial that “there is no litigated fact pattern precisely in point.” United States v. Brown, 555 F.2d 336, 339-40 (2d Cir. 1977).

Ocean Accident & G. Corp. v. Com'r of Internal Revenue

47 F.2d 582 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 16, 1931

See Crooks v. Harrelson, 282 U. S. 55 , 51 S. Ct. 49 , 75 L. Ed.-. … The Board made no finding that the method employed did not reflect net income.

Ryan Ready Mixed Concrete Corp. v. Franki Foundation Company

229 F.2d 289 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 12, 1956

See 1 Williston, Sales, Section 255; Barber Mining & Fertilizing Co. v. Brown Hoisting Mach. … Frankel v. Foreman & Clark, Inc., 2 Cir., 33 F.2d 83 , is not in point, since there the buyer had not accepted the goods but had merely assented to delivery, so that title had not passed. Thomson Co., Inc., v.

United States v. Quinones

317 F.3d 86 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 10, 2002

United States v. … United States v.

Silva v. Bankers Commercial Corporation

163 F.2d 602 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 30, 1947

Co. v. New York & Baltimore T. Line, 2 Cir., 185 F. *605 386, 389; Minturn v. Maynard, 17 How. 477 , 15 L.Ed. 235 ; Israel v. Moore & McCormack Co., D.C., 295 F. 919 . … Co. v. Garfield, 2 Cir., 10 F. 2d 664, 668, 669 . It is true that Justice Pecora reached a contrary result in Republic Chemical Corporation v.

Salaky v. The Atlas Barge No. 3 the Catherine O'BOyle

208 F.2d 174 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 20, 1953

See, e. g., Petterson Lighterage & Towing Corp. v. New York Cent. R. Co., 2 Cir., 126 F.2d 992 ; Cannella v. United States, 2 Cir., 179 F.2d 491 ; Gibbons v. … United States, 1 Cir., 186 F.2d 488 ; and see also United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 , 68 S.Ct. 525 , 92 L.Ed. 746 ; Gindorff v. Prince, 2 Cir., 189 F.2d 897, 898 .

United States v. Lies

74 F. 546 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 12, 1896

The collector thereupon transmitted the invoice, and all the papers and exhibits connected therewith, to the board of general appraisers. … The case at bar is clearly distinguishable from Grisar v.

United States v. Lisandro Patricio Thorpe

484 F.2d 1328 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 2, 1973

Thus this case is not like those in which local boards or their clerks furnished inaccurate information. See, e. g., United States v. Jacques, 463 F.2d 653, 658 (1 Cir. 1972); United States v. … In the absence of evidence we must presume that the Local Board acted in accord with regular procedures. See, e. g., United States v.

Jacobus v. The Scow Triboro No. 22

267 F.2d 547 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 12, 1959

There was no evidence of any general practice in the industry to keep captains on board under the circumstances here disclosed. … As no cross-claim is required to be filed as to matters growing out of the May 30 events, Patterson Oil Terminals, Inc. v.

19 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1266, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7793, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7883 Boston M. Chance and Louis C. Mercado v. The Board of Examiners, and the Board of Education of the City of New York and the Chancellor of the City School District

561 F.2d 1079 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 13, 1977

V § 6). It may not enact a statute which violates its mandate." Hurley v. Board of Education of City of N. Y., 270 N.Y. 275, 279 , 200 N.E. 818, 820 (1936). … See Board of Education of City of New York v.

The Kathryn B. Guinan

176 F. 301 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 7, 1910

C.) 84 Fed. 719 , where vessels were left with no one on board in open waters and sometimes in the face of approaching storms, or like Campbell v. Pennsylvania, 85 Fed. 462 , 29 C. C. … The reasoning of Rose v. Stephens, etc., Co. (O.

Nos. 98-7592, 98-7635

168 F.3d 630 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 19, 1999

Co. v. RJR Nabisco, Inc., 906 F.2d 884, 889 (2d Cir.1990). … Consarc Corp. v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A., 996 F.2d 568, 573 (2d Cir.1993); Cruden v. Bank of New York, 957 F.2d 961, 976 (2d Cir.1992).