Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca2

10,000+ results

1.94s

  • United States v. 416 Cases G. T. Whisky

    27 F.2d 738 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 2, 1928

    When overhauled and boarded, the testimony was that she was 4% miles off shore. … United States v. Bengoehea, supra.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Musical Instrument Sales Co. v. Anderson

    40 F.2d 454 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 7, 1930

    We do not understand that the finding of the Board of Tax Appeals that the $165,000 is “invested capital” is questioned by any party to this appeal. La Belle Iron Works v. United States, 256 U. S. at page 380, 41 S. … And the decision in La Belle Iron Works v. United States, 256 U. S. 377 , 41 S. Ct. 528 , 65 L.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Zheng v. Gonzales

    497 F.3d 201 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 10, 2007

    Lin v. … Jordan v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Medley v. Garland

    71 F.4th 35 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 15, 2023

    20-3079 Medley v. … v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Goetz v. Windsor Central School District

    698 F.2d 606 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 24, 1983

    See also White v. Mississippi State Oil and Gas Board, 650 F.2d 540, 542 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981); Beitzell v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 572 , 92 S.Ct. at 2706 . Under the Constitution its meaning must be "broad indeed." Id.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hattem v. Schwarzenegger

    449 F.3d 423 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 23, 2006

    Comm'n v. … The first, Mackey v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Schweizer Aircraft Corporation v. Local 1752, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America

    29 F.3d 83 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 11, 1994

    Implement Workers v. … Significantly, other provisions of the Plan also gave Schweizer's Board of Directors unlimited power over the Plan.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Edward Vega v. Floyd H. Miller, James C. Desimone, Howard L. English, Carolyn D. Jones, and G. Peter Cooney

    273 F.3d 460 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 29, 2001

    Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967), and Dube v. … See Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 573 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). The charges must be made “public” by the government employer, Brandt v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    386 F.3d 464 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 28, 2004

    See Zenz v. … Comm’r, 72 T.C. 751 , 1979 WL 3746 (1979), aff'd, 647 F.2d 169 (9th Cir.1981); Paparo v. Comm’r, 71 T.C. 692 , 1979 WL 3754 (1979); Benjamin v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • MacIo Ennis v. E. Lefevre, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent

    560 F.2d 1072 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 9, 1977

    Brown v. Warden, 417 F.Supp. 970, 973 (N.D.Ill.1976). … Brown v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Martin Fine v. Bellefonte Underwriters Insurance Co.

    758 F.2d 50 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 20, 1985

    Eutectic Corp. v. Metco Inc., 597 F.2d 32, 34 (2d Cir.1979); United States v. Fernandez, 506 F.2d 1200, 1202 (2d Cir.1974). See also Seese v. … See NLRB v. Brown & Root, Inc., 206 F.2d 73, 74 (8th Cir.1953). In the interest of finality of litigation, a panel will ordinarily recall its mandate only in exceptional circumstances.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Gunn v. Bridgeport Brass Co.

    152 F. 434 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 12, 1907

    a single method of division and subdivision might be continued as far as required; but, if it were desired to have all the decisions so classified that at the same time they were divided alphabetically — e. g., “Andrews v. … Smith,” “Brown v. S. S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Powell v. Maldonado

    Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 2, 2026

    25-259-cv Powell v. … See id.; Windward Bora LLC v. Browne, 110 F.4th 120, 129 (2d Cir. 2024).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Carter v. Incorporated Village of Ocean Beach

    Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 21, 2014

    13‐815‐cv Carter v.  … Lore v. 

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anna Mahramas v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., and House of Albert, Inc.

    475 F.2d 165 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 22, 1973

    ’s] legitimate interests,” Kermarec v. … Mahramas, was a seaman entitled to the benefits of the Jones Act and maintenance and cure because she was engaged in employment on board a ship.

    Cited 74 timesPublished
  • Martin v. Campanaro

    156 F.2d 127 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 5, 1946

    We agree that the action of the National War Labor Board did not create rights, enforceable by the claimants, which will support their claims. 1 3. … Mediation Board, the hearings before the National War Labor Board, and the wartime no-strike pledge given by organized labor (of which we may take judicial notice), we think that a “reasonable man” would not believe that,

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • Pereira v. Cogan

    52 F. App'x 536 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 25, 2002

    Pereira v. Cogan, 267 B.R. 500, 516 (S.D.N.Y.2001) (“Pereira /”). … Quickturn Design Sys., Inc. v. Shapiro, 721 A.2d 1281, 1291-92 (Del.1998); Abercrombie v. Davies, 123 A.2d 893, 900 (Del.Ch.1956).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • De La Rosa v. Holder

    598 F.3d 103 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 25, 2010

    09-3099-ag De La Rosa v. … See Xian Tuan Ye v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 446 F.3d 289 (2d Cir. 2006). “The Board will not engage in de novo review of findings of fact determined by an immigration judge.

    Cited 76 timesPublished
  • Crown Coat Front Co., Inc. v. United States

    363 F.2d 407 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 10, 1966

    This would appear to be settled by McMahon v. … Soriano v. United States, supra; McMahon v. United States, supra; States Marine Corp. of Del. v. United States, supra; Northern Metal Co. v. United States, supra, 350 F.2d at 836 .

    Reversed on other grounds by Crown Coat Front Co. v. United States, 386 U.S. 503 (1967)Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Scott A. Taber v. Robert S. Maine, and United States of America

    45 F.3d 598 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 5, 1995

    Roberto v. … Brown, 348 U.S. at 112 , 75 S.Ct. at 143 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.