Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca2

10,000+ results

0.65s

  • Shattuck v. Helvering

    119 F.2d 902 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 5, 1941

    Int.Rev.Acts, page 707, means the same as “acquired and held” (McFeely v. … Helvering v. San Joaquin Co., 297 U.S. 496 , 56 S.Ct. 569 , 80 L.Ed. 824 . Yet that is a stronger case, since it might be argued that the optionee “holds” what he has in his power to “acquire.” Cf. Sommers v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Francis Hoefer v. Bd. of Educ. of Middletown

    Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 14, 2016

    14-2020-cv Francis Hoefer v. Bd. of Educ. of Middletown 14‐2020‐cv  Francis Hoefer v.  … See, e.g.,  6  Storey  v. 

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Martin v. Campanaro

    156 F.2d 127 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 5, 1946

    We agree that the action of the National War Labor Board did not create rights, enforceable by the claimants, which will support their claims. 1 3. … Mediation Board, the hearings before the National War Labor Board, and the wartime no-strike pledge given by organized labor (of which we may take judicial notice), we think that a “reasonable man” would not believe that,

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • Local 812, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Afl-Cio, Canada Dry Distributors Association of New Jersey) v. National Labor Relations Board

    947 F.2d 1034 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 30, 1991

    Chevron USA Inc. v. … See Mobile Mechanical Contractors Ass'n v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pereira v. Cogan

    52 F. App'x 536 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 25, 2002

    Pereira v. Cogan, 267 B.R. 500, 516 (S.D.N.Y.2001) (“Pereira /”). … Quickturn Design Sys., Inc. v. Shapiro, 721 A.2d 1281, 1291-92 (Del.1998); Abercrombie v. Davies, 123 A.2d 893, 900 (Del.Ch.1956).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Murphy v. Inst. of Int'l Educ.

    32 F.4th 146 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 26, 2022

    See id. at 125; Brown, 420 F.3d at 154; Arcadian, 884 F.2d at 72. … Brown, 420 F.3d at 158 (internal quotation marks omitted).

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Wisdom Import Sales Company, L.L.C. v. Labatt Brewing Company Limited, Labatt Holdings, Inc., Labatt Usa, L.L.C., Lf Holdings I L.L.C., and Interbrew, S.A.

    339 F.3d 101 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 7, 2003

    The Bronx Household of Faith v. Board of Educ. of City of New York, 331 F.3d 342, 348 (2d Cir.2003). … See TCPIP Holding Co., Inc. v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • United States v. Davis

    689 F.3d 179 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 8, 2012

    Brown saw Davis lean over to say something to Laing—which Brown could not hear—whereupon Davis 6 shot Laing, first in the eye and then in the chest, killing the woman. … Davis also tried to shoot Brown, who was trying to hide under the bed, but his gun misfired.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Quan Chen v. Lynch

    631 F. App'x 42 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 25, 2015

    14-3517 Chen v. … Brown, New York, New York. 26 27 FOR RESPONDENT: Benjamin C.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Hylton v. Sessions

    897 F.3d 57 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 20, 2018

    Dennis Jacobs, Circuit Judge: *59 Antoine Hylton, a Jamaican national, petitions for review of the May 9, 2017 order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA"), which found him ineligible for cancellation of removal because … FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. , 529 U.S. 120 , 133, 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000).

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Felton J. Earls, III v. Stanley R. Resor, Secretary of the Army

    451 F.2d 1126 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 30, 1971

    Gordon v. Resor, supra. … , which led to the appeal board’s failure to follow its own regulations.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Acharya v. Holder

    761 F.3d 289 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 5, 2014

    See, e.g., Manzur v. U.S. … Khan v. Gonzales, 495 F.3d 31, 35 (2d Cir.2007); see also Liu v. INS, 508 F.3d 716, 721 (2d Cir.2007).

    Cited 60 timesPublished
  • Main Street Legal Services., Inc. v. National Security Council

    811 F.3d 542 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 26, 2016

    The Board for Low Intensity Conflict In 1986, Congress amended the National Security Act to provide for the President’s “establish[ment]” within the NSC System of “a board to be known as the ‘Board for Low Intensity Conflict … It is not clear that the statutory board or committees presently exist.

    Cited 69 timesPublished
  • Amalgamated Housing Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    108 F.2d 1010 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 2, 1940

    108 F.2d 1010 (1940) AMALGAMATED HOUSING CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. AMALGAMATED DWELLINGS, Inc., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. No. 40. … Orders affirmed on the opinion of the Board, 37 B.T.A. 817 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brian Burns

    104 F.3d 529 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 14, 1997

    United States v. Hernandez-Santiago, 92 F.3d 97, 100 (2d Cir.1996) (quoting United States v. Santiago, 906 F.2d 867, 871 (2d Cir.1990)); see also Koon v. … United States v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Morris Philip v. Mayer, Rothkopf Industries, Inc. And Mayer & Cie, Gmbh & Co.

    635 F.2d 1056 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 19, 1980

    Maclaren v. B-I-W Group Inc., 535 F.2d 1367 , 1372-73 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1001 , 97 S.Ct. 531 , 50 L.Ed.2d 612 (1976); Bishop and Babcock Mfg. Co. v. … The requirement is met by disclosures that are reasonably clear to one skilled in the art, Loom Co. v. Higgins, 105 U.S. 580, 585-86 , 26 L.Ed. 1177 (1881); Ansul Co. v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • David J. Joseph Co. v. M/V Baltic

    64 F. App'x 259 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 17, 2003

    However, Defendants-Appellants misconstrue the “free on board” provision of Plaintiff-Appellee’s agreement with Mitsui. … “F.O.B. or Free on Board means that title to the property passes from the seller to buyer at the designated FOB point.” Berisford, Metals Corp. v. S/S Salvador, 779 F.2d 841 , 843 n. 2 (2d Cir.1985).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wu Bing Zhang v. Lynch

    641 F. App'x 48 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 17, 2016

    13-2040 Zhang v. … Xiao 17 Ji Chen v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 471 F.3d 315, 329 (2d Cir. 18 2006); see also Liu v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Gleason v. Chain Service Restaurant

    422 F.2d 342 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 5, 1970

    422 F.2d 342 James GLEASON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. … Jacques v. Local 1418, 246 F.Supp. 857 (E.D.La.1965), aff'd, 404 F.2d 703 (5th Cir. 1969). See also Vars v. International Brotherhood, 215 F.Supp. 943 (D.Conn.), aff'd, 320 F.2d 576 (2d Cir. 1963).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Santoso v. Holder

    580 F.3d 110 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 14, 2009

    07-4713-ag Santoso v. … Chen v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 268, 271 (2d Cir. 2005).

    Cited 170 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.